Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proton-transfer reactions classical model

Figure A3.8.3 Quantum activation free energy curves calculated for the model A-H-A proton transfer reaction described 45. The frill line is for the classical limit of the proton transfer solute in isolation, while the other curves are for different fully quantized cases. The rigid curves were calculated by keeping the A-A distance fixed. An important feature here is the direct effect of the solvent activation process on both the solvated rigid and flexible solute curves. Another feature is the effect of a fluctuating A-A distance which both lowers the activation free energy and reduces the influence of the solvent. The latter feature enliances the rate by a factor of 20 over the rigid case. Figure A3.8.3 Quantum activation free energy curves calculated for the model A-H-A proton transfer reaction described 45. The frill line is for the classical limit of the proton transfer solute in isolation, while the other curves are for different fully quantized cases. The rigid curves were calculated by keeping the A-A distance fixed. An important feature here is the direct effect of the solvent activation process on both the solvated rigid and flexible solute curves. Another feature is the effect of a fluctuating A-A distance which both lowers the activation free energy and reduces the influence of the solvent. The latter feature enliances the rate by a factor of 20 over the rigid case.
The approach presented above is referred to as the empirical valence bond (EVB) method (Ref. 6). This approach exploits the simple physical picture of the VB model which allows for a convenient representation of the diagonal matrix elements by classical force fields and convenient incorporation of realistic solvent models in the solute Hamiltonian. A key point about the EVB method is its unique calibration using well-defined experimental information. That is, after evaluating the free-energy surface with the initial parameter a , we can use conveniently the fact that the free energy of the proton transfer reaction is given by... [Pg.58]

This model has obvious shortcomings. For example, the interaction with the solvent in the initial state is straightforward since the proton is in the ionic form, whereas in the final state, the proton is the nonionic adsorbed H atom and its interaction with the solvent should be negligible. No consideration of this fact was made in the potential of the final state Uf m Eq. (43). However, this treatment incorporates the basic feature of the proton transfer reaction interaction with the solvent, tunneling as well as classical transition of the proton, and the effect of the electric field on the potential energy surfaces of the system. [Pg.105]

Enthalpies of activation, transition-state geometries, and primary semi-classical (without tunneling) kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) have been calculated for 11 bimolecu-lar identity proton-transfer reactions, four intramolecular proton transfers, four nonidentity proton-transfer reactions, 11 identity hydride transfers, and two 1,2-intramole-cular hydride shifts at the HF/6-311+G, MP2/6-311+G, and B3LYP/6-311+-1-G levels.134 It has been found that the KIEs are systematically smaller for hydride transfers than for proton transfers. The differences between proton and hydride transfers have been rationalized by modeling the central C H- C- unit of a proton-transfer transition state as a four-electron, three-centre (4-e 3-c) system and the same unit of a hydride-transfer transition state as a 2-e 3-c system. [Pg.298]

ABSTRACT. Kinetics of proton transfer photoreactions in simple model systems is analyzed from the point of view of reaction kinetics in microphases. Protolytic photodissociation of some hydroxyaromatic compounds ArOH ( 1- and 2-na-phthol, chlorosubstituted naphthols ) was studied in micellar solutions and phospholipid vesicles by fluorescence spectra and kinetics. Experimental results give evidence of at least two localization sites of naphthols in the microphase of these systems. In lipid bilayer membranes of vesicles there are two comparable fractions of ArOH molecules, one of which undergo photodissociation, but another do not dissociate. In micelles only minor fraction ( few per cent ) of ArOH molecules do not take part in excited-state proton transfer reaction. These phenomena reflect heterogeneous structure and dynamic properties of lipid bilayer membranes and micelles. A correlation between proton transfer rate constants and equilibrium constants in microphases similar to that in homogeneous solutions is observed. Microphase approach give a possibility to discuss reactions in dynamical organized molecular systems in terms of classical chemical kinetics. [Pg.279]

In the preceding chapter, we gave a brief account of the modern theory of an elementary act of charge transfer reactions and, in particular, of electrode reactions. This new theory basically differs from the concepts generally accepted for a long time, and especially from the Horiuti-Polanyi model, in that it takes into account the dynamic role of the solvent and the difference in the behavior of classical and quantum degrees of freedom. This difference should be manifested most clearly in proton transfer reactions, since the proton is a particle which behaves essentially in a quantum-mechanical manner. Therefore, our primary task was to study experimentally an elementary act of proton donor discharge. [Pg.126]

In contrast to the subsystem representation, the adiabatic basis depends on the environmental coordinates. As such, one obtains a physically intuitive description in terms of classical trajectories along Born-Oppenheimer surfaces. A variety of systems have been studied using QCL dynamics in this basis. These include the reaction rate and the kinetic isotope effect of proton transfer in a polar condensed phase solvent and a cluster [29-33], vibrational energy relaxation of a hydrogen bonded complex in a polar liquid [34], photodissociation of F2 [35], dynamical analysis of vibrational frequency shifts in a Xe fluid [36], and the spin-boson model [37,38], which is of particular importance as exact quantum results are available for comparison. [Pg.389]

Despite all the problems inherent to QM/CM approaches, some extremely interesting and perceptive work has been described in the literature recently in which all sorts of approaches have been used, improvements introduced and results obtained ([351, 372] and references therein). The study of enzyme catalysed reaction mechanisms, the calculation of relative binding free energies of substrates and inhibitor, and the determination of proton transfer processes in enzymatic reactions, are all good examples of enzyme-ligand interactions studies. Even though Warshel s EVB method [349] probably remains the most practical QM/CM approach for the study of enzyme catalysis, very useful work has been reported on enzyme catalysed reactions ([381] for an excellent review-[238, 319, 382-384]). This is a consequence of the accuracy of QM to treat the active site and inhibitor/substrate and the viability of classical mechanics to model the bulk of the enzyme not directly involved in the chemical reaction. [Pg.575]


See other pages where Proton-transfer reactions classical model is mentioned: [Pg.415]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.608]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 , Pg.60 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 ]




SEARCH



Classical model

Classical modeling

Proton reactions

Proton transfer model

Proton transfer reactions

Protonation Reactions

Transfer model

© 2024 chempedia.info