Protein synthesis limits

A problem with employment of ASON in a larger clinical setting is their poor uptake and inappropriate intracellular compartmentalization, e.g., sequestration in endosomal or lysosomal complexes. In addition, there is a need for a very careful selection of the ASON-mRNA pair sequences that would most efficiently hybridize. To date, several computer programs are used to predict the secondary and tertiary structures of the target mRNA and, in turn, which of the mRNA sequences are most accessible to the ASON. However, even with this sophisticated techniques, the choice of base-pairing partners still usually includes a component of empiricism. Despite these principal limitations, it has become clear that ASON can penetrate into cells and mediate their specific inhibitory effect of the protein synthesis in various circumstances. 

Chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin) interferes witii or inhibits protein synthesis, a process necessary for the growth and multiplication of microorganisms. This is a potentially dangerous drug (see below), and therefore its use is limited to serious infections when less potentially dangerous drugp are ineffective or contraindicated. 

The catalytic activities of the fortified wheat germ cell-free systems supplemented with each fraction were investigated (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 2, only 0 - 40 % ammonium sulfate fraction showed an enhancement in DHFR protein synthesis. This enhancement of protein experimental results and the fact that the various eukaryotic initiation factors are contained in synthesis was also confirmed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (Fig. 3). From the above 0-40 % ammonium sulfate fraction [5, 6], it can be concluded that the amount of initiation factors in a conventionally prepared wheat germ cell-fi extract is deficient for the translation of DHFR with internal ribosome entry site. Therefore, it needs to supplement a wheat germ cell-free extract with the fraction containing the limited initiation factors for the efficient protein translation, and this fortified cell-free system can be easily made by simple... 

The eytoplasm is a viscous fluid and contains within it systems of paramount importance. These are the nucleus, responsible for the genehc make-up of the cell, and the ribosomes, whieh are the site of protein synthesis, hi addihon are found granules of reserve material suehas polylydioxybutyric add, an energy reserve, and polyphosphate or volutin granules, the exact funchon of which has not yet been elucidated. The prokaiyohc nueleus or bacterial chromosome exists in the cytoplasm in the form of a loop and is not surrounded by a nuclear membrane. Bacteria cany other chromosomal elements episomes, which are portions of the main chromosome that have become isolated firm it, and plasmids, whieh may be called miniature chromosomes. These are small annular pieees of DNA whieh carry a limited amount of genetic information. 

Potassium is the second most abundant cation in the body and is found primarily in the intracellular fluid. Potassium has many important physiologic functions, including regulation of cell membrane electrical action potential (especially in the myocardium), muscular function, cellular metabolism, and glycogen and protein synthesis. Potassium in PN can be provided as chloride, acetate, and phosphate salts. One millimole of potassium phosphate provides 1.47 mEq of elemental potassium. Generally, the concentration of potassium in peripheral PN (PPN) admixtures should not exceed 80 mEq/L (80 mmol/L). While it is safer to also stick to the 80 mEq/L (80 mmol/L) limit for administration through a central vein, the maximum recommended potassium concentration for infusion via a central vein is 150 mEq/L (150 mmol/L).14 Patients with abnormal potassium losses (e.g., loop or thiazide diuretic therapy) may have higher requirements, and patients with renal failure may require potassium restriction. 

Mailer Neither ribosomes nor mitochondria can explain translational limitations in the oocyte, because there are many more ribosomes and mitochondria than are needed yet protein synthesis is very limited. Every message put in is translated at the expense of some endogenous message. No one knows yet what the limiting factor for translation is in oocytes. 

Clindamycin is a chlorine-substituted derivative of lincomycin. However it is more potent and is better absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and has therefore replaced lincomycin in most situations. Clindamycin is in principle a bacteriostatic agent. Its indications are mainly limited to mixed anaerobic infections. As mentioned above it has a similar mechanism of action as erythromycin. It selectively inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the same 50s ribosomal subunits. Erythromycin and clindamycin can interfere with each other by competing for this receptor. Also cross-resistance with erythromycin frequently occurs. Resistance is rather chromosomal rather than plasmid mediated and is especially found in cocci and Clostridium difficile. 

Fusidic acid is a product of, among others, the fungus Fusidium coccineum. It has a steroidal structure and has mainly bacteriostatic activity. Its mechanism of action is based on inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis. Its indications are limited to the treatment of severe staphylococcal infections, usually in combination with another antistaphylococcal agent to prevent the emergence of resistance. 

Viruses are obligate intracellular organisms as their replication is based on DNA and RNA dependent processes and protein synthesis of the host. Antiviral therapy can therefore not be as selective as antibacterial treatments and anti-viral agents tend to inhibit host cell function and can cause major toxicity. An other problem with antiviral therapy is the fact that active viral replication mostly takes place before symptoms become manifest. Our armamentarium against most viral infections is limited. 

Some drugs that exert their maximum cytotoxicity during the S-phase of the cycle also prevent cells from progressing through the cell cycle to the S-phase this is accomplished by sublethal inhibition of RNA and protein synthesis. The antimetabolites methotrexate, fluo-rouracU, and mercaptopurine all can inhibit RNA synthesis in Gi- and Gz-phases and inhibit DNA synthesis during S-phase. This inhibition of cell cycle progression actually may result in reduced cytotoxicity, and such agents have been termed S-phase-specific but self-limited. 

Error Correction by RNA Polymerases DNA polymerases are capable of editing and error correction, whereas the capacity for error correction in RNA polymerases appears to be quite limited. Given that a single base error in either replication or transcription can lead to an error in protein synthesis, suggest a possible biological explanation for this striking difference. 

---