Protein structure folding domains

The use of sequence information to frame structural, functional, and evolutionary hypotheses represents a major challenge for the postgeno-mic era. Central to an understanding of the evolution of sequence families is the concept of the domain a structurally conserved, genetically mobile unit. When viewed at the three-dimensional level of protein structure, a domain is a compact arrangement of secondary structures connected by linker polypeptides. It usually folds independently and possesses a relatively hydrophobic core (Janin and Chothia, 1985). The importance of domains is that they cannot be divided into smaller units— they represent a fundamental building block that can be used to understand the evolution of proteins. 

Fig. 6.3. Schematic representation of the domain structure of human CREB-binding protein CBP. Folded domains are shown as spheres. Adapted by permission from [5] (Macmillan Publishers Ltd., copyright 2005)...

Eortunately, a 3D model does not have to be absolutely perfect to be helpful in biology, as demonstrated by the applications listed above. However, the type of question that can be addressed with a particular model does depend on the model s accuracy. At the low end of the accuracy spectrum, there are models that are based on less than 25% sequence identity and have sometimes less than 50% of their atoms within 3.5 A of their correct positions. However, such models still have the correct fold, and even knowing only the fold of a protein is frequently sufficient to predict its approximate biochemical function. More specifically, only nine out of 80 fold families known in 1994 contained proteins (domains) that were not in the same functional class, although 32% of all protein structures belonged to one of the nine superfolds [229]. Models in this low range of accuracy combined with model evaluation can be used for confirming or rejecting a match between remotely related proteins [9,58]. 

Jurnak, E, et al. Parallel p domains a new fold in protein structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4 802-806, 1994. 

Figure 17.16 Ribbon diagram representations of the structures of domain B1 from protein G (blue) and the dimer of Rop (red). The fold of B1 has been converted to an a-helical protein like Rop by changing 50% of its amino acids sequence. (Adapted from S. Dalai et al.,...

They started from the sequence of a domain, Bl, from an IgG-binding protein called Protein G. This domain of 56 amino acid residues folds into a four-stranded p sheet and one a helix (Figure 17.16). Their aim was to convert this structure into an all a-helical structure similar to that of Rop (see Chapter 3). Each subunit of Rop is 63 amino acids long and folds into two a helices connected by a short loop. The last seven residues are unstructured and were not considered in the design procedure. Two subunits of Rop form a four-helix bundle (Figure 17.16). 

Conti et al. (1996) solved the crystal structure of the P. pyralis luciferase at 2.0 A resolution. The protein is folded into two compact domains, a large N-terminal portion and a small C-terminal portion. The former portion consists of a /1-barrel and two /1-sheets. The sheets are flanked by a-helices to form an aflafia five-layered structure. The C-terminal portion of the molecule forms a distinct domain, which is separated from the N-terminal domain by a wide cleft. It is suggested that the two domains will close up in the course of the luminescence reaction. 

Detailed protein structures have been reported for BPI and CETP. Given the aforementioned similarities within this gene family, these protein structures serve as a likely model for the protein structure of PLTP. CETP and BPI are elongated molecules, shaped like a boomerang. There are two domains with similar folds, and a central beta-sheet domain between these two domains. The molecules contain two lipid-binding sites, one in each domain near the interface of the barrels and the central beta-sheet. 

Similar residues in the cores of protein structures especially hydrophobic residues at the same positions, are responsible for common folds of homologous proteins. Certain sequence profiles of conserved residue successions have been identified which give rise to a common fold of protein domains. They are organized in the smart database (simple modular architecture research tool) http //smait.embl-heidelberg.de. 

Proteins derive their powerful and diverse capacity for molecular recognition and catalysis from their ability to fold into defined secondary and tertiary structures and display specific functional groups at precise locations in space. Functional protein domains are typically 50-200 residues in length and utilize a specific sequence of side chains to encode folded structures that have a compact hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic surface. Mimicry of protein structure and function by non-natural ohgomers such as peptoids wiU not only require the synthesis of >50mers with a variety of side chains, but wiU also require these non-natural sequences to adopt, in water, tertiary structures that are rich in secondary structure. 

The N-terminal domain of the OCP is an orthogonal alpha-helical bundle, subdivided into two four-helix bundles (Figure 1.3a and c). These subdomains are composed of discontinuous segments of the polypeptide chain (gray and white in Figure 1.3c). To date, the OCP N-terminal domain is the only known protein structure with this particular fold (Pfam 09150). The hydroxyl terminus of the 3 -hydroxyechinenone is nestled between the two bundles. The C-terminal domain (dark... 

Due to the ready accessibility of SH2 domains by molecular biology techniques, numerous experimentally determined 3D structures of SH2 domains derived by X-ray crystallography as well as heteronuclear multidimensional NMR spectroscopy are known today. The current version of the protein structure database, accessible to the scientific community by, e.g., the Internet (http //www.rcsb.org/pdb/) contains around 80 entries of SH2 domain structures and complexes thereof. Today, the SH2 domain structures of Hck [62], Src [63-66], Abl [67], Grb2 [68-71], Syp [72], PLCy [73], Fyn [74], SAP [75], Lck [76,77], the C- and N-terminal SH2 domain ofp85a [78-80], and of the tandem SH2 domains Syk [81,82], ZAP70 [83,84], and SHP-2 [85] are determined. All SH2 domains display a conserved 3D structure as can be expected from multiple sequence alignments (Fig. 4). The common structural fold consists of a central three-stranded antiparallel ft sheet that is occasionally extended by one to three additional short strands (Fig. 5). This central ft sheet forms the spine of the domain which is flanked on both sides by regular a helices [49, 50,60]. 

The T4 short tail fiber triple /l-helix is connected to a more globular head domain via residues 333-341, which form a very short a-helical triple coiled-coil. Residues 342-396, together with the C-terminal /1-strand composed of amino acids 518-527 (the collar ), are the only part of the structure in which the monomer has a recognizable fold. It may therefore be the first part of the protein to fold, followed by a zipping-up of the N-terminal domain and the top domain. The small, globular, domain contains six /1-strands and one a-helix and has some structural homology to gpl 1, also of bacteriophage T4. Three of the /1-strands and the a-helix formed by residues... 

The association of secondary structures to give super-secondary structures, which frequently constitute compactly folded domains in globular proteins, is completed by the a-a motifs in which two a-helices are packed in an anti-parallel fashion, with a short connecting loop (Figure 4.8c). Examples of these three structural domains, often referred to as folds, are illustrated in Figures 4.9—4.11. The schematic representation of the main chains of proteins, introduced by Jane Richardson, is used with the polypeptide backbone... 

Protein domains are the common currency of protein structure and function. Protein domains are discrete structural units that fold up to form a compact globular shape. Experiments on protein structure and function have been greatly aided by consideration of the modular nature of proteins. This has allowed very large proteins to be studied. The expression of individual domains has allowed the intractable giant muscle protein titin to be structurally studied (Pfuhl and Pastore, 1995). Protein domains can be found in a variety of contexts, (Fig. 1), in association with a range of unrelated domains and in a variety of orders. Ultimately protein domains are defined at the level of three-dimensional structure however, many protein domains have been described at the level of sequence. The success of sequence-based methods has been demonstrated by numerous confirmations, by elucidation of the three-dimensional structure of the domain. 

Experience gained from protein structure determination in the past 30 years demonstrates that domains possessing similar sequences also possess similar folds, leading to the inference that such domains are members of homologous families (Doolittle, 1995 Henikoff etal., 1997). Some homologous domain sequences have diverged considerably beyond the level at which homology can be reliably predicted. However,... 

---