Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Protein design directed evolution

Lee, PC. et al., Alteration of product specificity of Aeropyrum pemix famesylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (fgs) by directed evolution. Protein Eng. Design Sel. 17, 771, 2004. [Pg.397]

Hamamatsu, N., Aita, T., Nomiya, Y. et al. (2005) Biased mutation-assembling an efficient method for rapid directed evolution through simultaneous mutation accumulation. Protein Engineering Design Selection, 18, 265-271. [Pg.76]

There have been many attempts to improve protein stability and protein properties, utilizing methods such as random mutagenesis, directed evolution, and rational protein design approaches. In general, these methods are far from straightforward and can be time-consuming. In addition, the stabilization of proteins without loss of function is not a trivial problem. [Pg.18]

U. T. Bornscheuer and M. Pohl, Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design, Cun. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 137-143. [Pg.335]

Dr. Martina Pohl has entitled her contribution Protein Design on Pyruvate Decarboxylase (PDC) by Site-Directed Mutagenesis . New enzymes cannot only be obtained by directed evolution but also by site-directed mutagenesis so that very interesting complementary approaches emerge here. Particularly in the past view years, success has been achieved in selectively modifying the substrate spectrum and reaction conditions for enzymes used in practical operations. [Pg.254]

Major advances in the knowledge of biochemical pathways and the establishment of computer-based predictions of three-dimensional structures of proteins led to the development of new microbiological methods, such as rational protein design or directed evolution, giving scientists the possibility to provide tailor-made biocatalysts [15-19]. These methodological works on the disclosure of new efficient biocatalysts are not explicitly mentioned in this review unless they were applied in natural product synthesis. Biotransformations do not always compete with known chemical syntheses, but rather complement the portfolio of catalytic methods in organic chemistry. [Pg.4]

Jackel C, Kast P et al (2008) Protein design by directed evolution. Annu Rev Biophys 37 153-173... [Pg.36]

All these approaches have been used to alter protein function, to increase the activity or solubility of proteins, or to adapt enzymes for industrial applications. The goal of artificial man-made proteins with tailor-made activities is, however, still far away and none of the currently existing approaches provides the ultimate solution to the directed evolution of proteins. Nevertheless, numerous examples of successfully altered and improved proteins clearly show the power of directed evolution for protein design. [Pg.342]

Doi, N., and Yanagawa, H. (1999). Design of generic biosensors based on green fluorescent proteins with allosteric sites by directed evolution. FEBS Lett., 453, 305-307. [Pg.70]

In this chapter, we glean the most relevant results from different backgrounds and combine them in a way that is useful to researchers applying evolutionary methods to protein design. We focus on controlling the evolutionary dynamics with an emphasis on relationships between experimental parameters that lead to phase transitions and upper and lower limits. The backbone and motivation behind the theory— information that is necessary to understand the results—are explained in Section II. The implications of the theoretical work, as applied to current methods in directed evolution, are explored in Section III. Finally, results that are important in driving future evolution experiments... [Pg.80]

Estimating tolerance is important in predicting the potential for directed evolution. As a method of determine the average tolerance over an entire protein sequence (designability) rather than tolerance at specific positions. Suzuki et al. (1996) compared the distribution of mutations in selected and unselected libraries. If the protein was tolerant to substitutions, the number of mutations in both libraries would be the same. The average number of mutations for the selected library is lowered by the fraction that is deleterious. Indeed, they found that the O-helix of Taq polymerase I (Taq Pol I) is significantly less tolerant than the /33//34 region of HIV reverse transcriptase (HIV RT) (Fig. 17). They attribute this difference in survival rate versus number of mutations to... [Pg.140]


See other pages where Protein design directed evolution is mentioned: [Pg.135]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.206]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2469 , Pg.2470 , Pg.2471 , Pg.2472 ]




SEARCH



Designed evolution

Designer proteins

Directed evolution

Evolution direction

Protein design

Protein evolution

Proteins directed evolution

© 2024 chempedia.info