Property-specific training, chemical

We have already discussed about the different targets for a model to be good in fitting or in prediction. For regulatory purposes, there has to be a proof that the QSAR model also applies for the prediction of the property of new chemicals, and so this has to be specifically addressed. This fact introduced the accent on the statistical validation of the model. The fourth principle wants to ensure that a suitable check is done, on a statistical point of view, to verify that the model is not simply working for the limited number of chemicals used for the training set. A number of techniques are available, and they should be used. 

Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). The hazard communication standard requires that all personnel receive training concerning the types of materials handled in the workplace and the potential hazards associated with handling and use of these materials. In addition, the standard requires that a MSDS for each hazardous material be made available for individual employee reference. The MSDS outlines specific material chemical and physical properties, exposure information, emergency response information, regulatory information, and any other information of significance concerning the material. 

The most conuiion cause of fire accidents in process plants is equipment failure. Tliis is primarily a result of poor equipment maintenance or poor equipment layout and design. Maintenance perfonned according to a detailed and well structured schedule will significantly reduce tlie occurrence of fire accidents. Tlie second largest cause of fire accidents is ignorance of tlie properties of a specific chemical or chemical process. Proper training of employees will increase tlieir knowledge of tlie properties of a specific chemical and chemical process and can prevent many of tliese chemical fire accidents. 

As in Lyman s Handbook, emphasis is on broadly applicable estimation methods. Given the many and varied reasons that one might be interested in chemical property estimation, we believe that most users of this book will have less interest in chemical class-specific estimation methods. Obviously such methods are reliable only for that class, which may be defined very narrowly, and they may produce substantial yet unknown error if applied to compounds that differ significantly. Many of the newer methods were developed using much larger and more varied training sets, thus are more likely to be useful for diverse and/or structurally complex compounds. Therefore, in contrast to the situation that existed in 1982 when Lyman s Handbook was published, current users often do not need to make decisions about which of several class-specific methods seems most applicable to the compound of interest. 

During lipid oxidation, the primary oxidation products that are formed by the autoxidation of unsaturated lipids are hydroperoxides, which have little or no direct impact on the sensory properties of foods. However, hydroperoxides are degraded to produce additional radicals which further accelerates the oxidation process and produce secondary oxidation products such as aldehydes, ketones, acids and alcohols, of which some are volatiles with very low sensory thresholds and have potentially significant impact on the sensory properties namely odor and flavor [2, 3]. Sensory analysis of food samples are performed by a panel of semi to highly trained personnel under specific quarantined conditions. Any chemical method used to determine lipid oxidation in food must be closely correlated with a sensory panel because the human nose is the most appropriate detector to monitor the odorants resulting from oxidative and non-oxidative degradation processes. The results obtained from sensory analyses provide the closest approximation to the consumers approach. Sensory analyses of smell and taste has been developed in many studies of edible fats and oils and for fatty food quality estimation [1, 4, 5]. 

---