Program sharing

Report any information relating to medication errors to the Medication Errors Reporting Program operated by USP convention [10] and the Institute for Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) or other corresponding institutions in the different countries. The program shares information on medication errors with health care professionals to prevent similar errors from recurring. 

All these programs share the common feature that they start out from water analyses which were designed as comprehensive as possible, along with conceiving the measured values as cumulative parameters (sums of all aquatic species), only to subsequently allocate them to the various aquatic species. This was done by applying iteration calculus that accounts for the equilibria related to the various aquatic species. 

The two primary industry consensns programs for managing transportation risk are the Responsible Care Distribntion Code of Management Practices and the National Association of Chemical Distribntors Responsible Distribution Process (RDP). These programs share similar elements and are widely used across the chemical distribution supply chain. Responsible Care is a recognized internationally performance-based system that contains the following elements ... 

The NRC and IAEA programs share the common -practical goal of seeking to establish accurate values for the detection limit performance... 

The concept of program sharing is almost as old as the use of the computer itself in some areas of nuclear science and technology, particularly, in reactor... 

Most effective motor carrier safety management programs share common fundamental elements. When combined into a cohesive system, these elements can produce a continually improving safety management program that produces consistently positive results ... 

Another student at Smith college, a women-only liberal arts college that recently launched an engineering program, shares Becky s recognition of the lack of exposure to social and political issues she receives in her engineering courses ... 

In fact, SEMS and SEMP programs share the first two goals. SEMS makes it clear that it is the operator of a facility who is responsible for its safety, and RP 75 is basically a nonprescriptive standard (although it does incorporate many prescriptive rules). One of the themes of this book is that the difference between the two approaches—SEMS and safety cases—is not as great as is sometimes thought. 

The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) has been formed, consisting of nuclear plant operators over the entire world who have pledged to assist each other in the achievement of safe operations (25). There are four centers from which this international program is adrninistered one in the United States in Atlanta, Georgia, operated by INPO one in Paris operated by Electricitir de Prance one in Moscow operated by the Ministry of Nuclear Power and one in Tokyo operated by the Central Research Institute for the Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI). Through this mechanism, teams of operators from the U.S., Western Europe, and Asia visit CIS plants to share safety experience and know-how, and similarly, plant personnel from Russian and Eastern European nuclear units visit European, Asian, and U.S. plants. 

Center for Chemical Process Safety. In 1985, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers estabHshed the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (New York). The objective of the CCPS was to help prevent catastrophic chemical accidents by compiling information on the latest scientific and engineering practices, safety programs, and adininistrative procedures of the larger members of the chemical industry, so that they can be shared with other (and particularly the smaller) members of the chemical and petrochemical industries. 

This decreasing efficiency is a general characteristic of shared memory, shared bus computers. This example shows unusually high efficiency compared with many other programs. This may be because LINPACK is such a common benchmark that much effort has been devoted to optimising it for both vector and parallel computers. 

Figure 9 Relative accuracy of comparative models. Upper left panel, comparison of homologous structures that share 40% sequence identity. Upper right panel, conformations of ileal lipid-binding protein that satisfy the NMR restraints set equally well. Lower left panel, comparison of two independently determined X-ray structures of interleukin 1(3. Lower right panel, comparison of the X-ray and NMR structures of erabutoxin. The figure was prepared using the program MOLSCRIPT [236].

---