Process control regulatory

This control activity includes process control and unit management. Process control includes those loops and devices that perform sequential control, regulatory control, and discrete control. Unit management is responsible for coordinating the activities associated with the batch units (e.g., allocating resources within the unit, ensuring that batch sequences proceed in the proper order, etc.). 

To maximize the unit s profit, one must operate the unit simultaneously against as many constraints as possible. Examples of these constraints are limits on the air blower, the wet gas compresst>r. reactor/regenerator temperatures, slide valve differentials, etc. The conventional regulatory controllers work only one loop at a time and they do not talk to one another. A skilled operator can push the unit against more than one constraint at a time, but the constraints change often. To operate closer to multiple constraints, a number of refiners have installed an advanced process control (APC) package either within their DCS or in a host computer. 

Advance Process Control (APC) is a mechanism which manipulates regulatory controls toward more optimum unit operation. 

Unlike SPC techniques, standard feedback control methods such as PID-control, do exert control upon a process, in an effort to minimize y, — yk. Control in Statistical Process Control is as such not regulatory control, but a semantic means of relating SPC to quality control—a means that often leads to the hybrid term SQC. Ogunnaike and Ray [14, Sec. 28.4] offer advice on when to use SPC and when to use standard feedback control methods When the sampling interval is much greater than the process response time, when zero-mean Gaussian measurement noise dominates process disturbances, and when the cost of regulatory control action is considerable, SPC is preferred. 

This section describes some of the tools available for intelligent development of process cycles, such as the time-temperature cycles used in curing composites. Current industrial practice is typically limited to the use of cure cycles. The cycles are based on a series of autoclave temperature and pressure states so that traditional linear, regulatory process control methods can be used. These recipes may not be the ideal method for process control of batch processes because they do not ... 

Assessment of process capability and statistical process control brings the ability to distinguish between a stable and un-stable process and provides a means to distinguish between different causes of variability, e.g., common cause, special cause, structural (e.g., seasonal), and tampering (e.g., deliberate or unintentional). Process understanding, quality by design and capability analysis can facilitate risk-based regulatory decisions for continuous improvements ... 

Risk based regulatory scrutiny that relates to the level of scientific understanding of how formulation and manufacturing process factors affect product quality and performance and the capability of process control strategies to prevent or mitigate risk of producing a poor quality product. 

However, although these aspects are discussed as separate topics below, in line with the way scientific studies and regulatory issues are normally defined, most consumers still see them as parts of a holistic picture where the good intentions of the people involved in the food supply chain are the most important assurance for all aspects of food quality. In this context, stringent safety measures and sophisticated process control, which are the cornerstone of food quality assurance schemes in conventional supply chains, maybe seen by consumers at best as self-imposed restrictions that prove the sincerity of these good intentions, and at worst as unfair, unnecessary burdens introduced through lobbying from big profit business to support its suppression of small-scale or local producers. 

Economic Incentives for Automation Projects Industrial applications of advanced process control strategies such as MPC are motivated by the need for improvements regarding safety, product quality, environmental standards, and economic operation of the process. One view of the economics incentives for advanced automation techniques is illustrated in Fig. 8-41. Distributed control systems (DCS) are widely used for data acquisition and conventional singleloop (PID) control. The addition of advanced regulatory control systems such as selective controls, gain scheduling, and time-delay compensation can provide benefits for a modest incremental cost. But... 

Validation should cover the whole analytical procedure—from the preparation of the laboratory sample to the evaluation of the result, that is, the whole range of intended matrices, and should be performed within the expected range of concentrations. The intended use of the analytical results should also be considered. This means that the result can be used to evaluate compliance with regulations, to maintain quality and process control, to make regulatory decisions, to support national and international trade, and, last but not least, to support research. It should be clearly understood that validation is carried out in order to evaluate the performance of the applied analytical procedure, not the performance of the analyst or the laboratory. 

If we accept that Juran, Deming, and Crosby are correct in their views on quality it should be clear that validation must be an inherently valuable activity. It must be viewed as more than a regulatory requirement a mechanism for significantly enhanced process control. The pressures to increase profitability without compromise to product quality require enhanced methods for product preparation and production. Th is can be ach ieved today through the employment of a sound validation program. 

Statistical process control methods are applied to preparative chromatography for the case where cut points for the effluent fractions are determined by on-line species-specific detection (e.g., analytical chromatography). A simple, practical method is developed to maximize the yield of a desired component while maintaining a required level of product purity in the presence of measurement error and external disturbances. Relations are developed for determining tuning parameters such as the regulatory system gain. 

---