Procedures and method statements

All activities having a significant impact on the quality of the works, and where information given in the contractual drawings and specifications is insufficient, shall be the subject of a procedure or method statement to be submitted by the construction contractor to the EPCM contractor for review and acceptance before the start of the works. In the specific case of welding, these take the form of weld procedure 

---

Has each construction contractor a site quality plan, an inspection and test plan, procedures and method statements, model inspection and test record forms and the definition of the contents of the construction quality file ... 

Studies are defined and guided by protocols, a detailed statement of all procedures and methods to be employed. Figure 82.1 summarizes the major steps in clinical trials in which human performance variables represent those of primary interest, although the general process is similar for most trial involving human subjects. 

Protocol A detailed statement of all procedures and methods to be employed in a research investigation. 

A except for the additional programming that is required to evaluate the agreement between calculatd and observed group concentrations (expressed by CHISQ). The METHOD statement selected a fixed step Runge-Kutta integration method rather than a variable step method because a fixed integration method is necessary for the CHISQ PROCEDURE to work properly. 

Later, Kuppermann and Belford (1962a, b) initiated computer-based numerical solution of (7.1), giving the space-time variation of the species concentrations from these, the survival probability at a given time may be obtained by numerical integration over space. Since then, this method has been vigorously followed by others. John (1952) has discussed the convergence requirement for the discretized form of (7.1), which must be used in computers this turns out to be AT/(Ap)2normalized forms of r and t. Often, Ar/(Ap)2 = 1/6 is used to ensure better convergence. Of course, any procedure requires a reaction scheme, values of diffusion and rate coefficients, and a statement about initial number of species and their distribution in space (vide infra). 

In this book PDEs appear primarily in Section 8.1 and problem section P8.01. Some simpler methods of solution are mentioned there Separation of variables, application of finite differences and method of lines. Analytical solutions can be made of some idealized cases, usually in terms of infinite series, but the main emphasis in this area is on numerical procedures. Beyond the brief statements in Chapter 8, this material is outside the range of this book. Further examples are treated by WALAS (Modeling with Differential Equations in Chemical Engineering, 1991). 

The basic principles of PES, the experimental methods, the interpretation procedures and the applications have been described in several books1-10. There are also some more recent review articles11-13. Extensive data collections are available, e.g. by Robinson14. Also the early days of PES have been highlighted1516. Only a few words are hence necessary to provide a basis for the following statements. 

Statistical Analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of toxicity data was conducted using SAS/STAT software (version 8.2 SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All toxicity data were transformed (square root, log, or rank) before ANOVA. Comparisons among multiple treatment means were made by Fisher s LSD procedure, and differences between individual treatments and controls were determined by one-tailed Dunnett s or Wilcoxon tests. Statements of statistical significance refer to a probability of type 1 error of 5% or less (p s 0.05). Median lethal concentrations (LCjq) were determined by the Trimmed Spearman-Karber method using TOXSTAT software (version 3.5 Lincoln Software Associates, Bisbee, AZ). 

The laboratory shall record the results [15] obtained in validation testing, the procedure used for validation, and a statement as to whether the method is appropriate for the intended use. 

In the early development of turbidimetry, scattering of light was not reproducible from one sample to another because it was difficult to control the processing of the sample. In 1927, this led Wells to voice his scepticism of the reliability of results obtained from instruments relying on the measurement of scattered radiation [62]. In view of this, turbidity measurements were not accepted as standard methods at that time. Once the limitations of such optical methods were understood, however, their real potential could be exploited. Nowadays, a reproducible suspension is easily attained, particularly in flow analysis. As a consequence, several turbidimetric procedures have been successfully implemented and Wells statement is no longer valid. 

The amount of rejected and qualified data varied greatly with a large increase in the fourth quarter. Samples from the first three quarters were analyzed by one laboratory, and the samples from the fourth quarter were analyzed by a different laboratory. Based upon the above results and experience at other sites, not ill laboratories perform equally. Even though both laboratories were using identical methods, quality control procedures, and statements of work designed to obtain consistent results, the resultant quality of work varied greatly. Apparently, the procedures and associated quality control were not adequately transferred to the laboratory bench. 

---