Procedure Apparatus

Oxidation Procedure, Apparatus and Reagents. The wrist-action oxidation apparatus and general oxidation procedure have been described (18). 

Eranson, M. A. H. and A. D. Eaton, eds. 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. Washington, D.C. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, prepared and published jointly. This standard work details comprehensive tests for all major pollutants, giving precise instructions for procedures, apparatus setup, calibrations, and current reference data. Subscription information at http //www.standardmethods.org/ (accessed March 23, 2011). 

First prominent scientist to perform controlled experiments and publish his work with details concerning procedures, apparatus, and observations (results). 

Measuring the gross heating value (mass) is done in the laboratory using the ASTM D 240 procedure by combustion of the fuel sample under an oxygen atmosphere, in a bomb calorimeter surrounded by water. The thermal effects are calculated from the rise in temperature of the surrounding medium and the thermal characteristics of the apparatus. 

The relatively concentrated hydrochloric acid is employed so that with ordinary use of the apparatus, spent liquor does not accumulate very rapidly the concentrated acid also ensures a brisk and delicately controlled flow of gas. When the generator is replenished with acid, marble or both, the de-aeration procedure detailed above is repeated until a sufficiently air-free gas supply is obtained. 

The only disadvantage is that the procedure does not give accurate results if the compound sublimes the capillary tube method should be used in such cases, and it may be necessary to employ a sealed capillary tube. This apparatus should find a place in every laboratory. It is... 

Hydrogen chloride. Method 1 from concentrated sulphuric acid and fused ammonium chloride). The most convenient procedure is to allow concentrated sulphuric acid to react with lumps of fused ammonium chloride in a Kipp s apparatus. The gas may be dried by passage through a wash bottle containing concentrated sulphuric acid the latter should be followed by an empty wash bottle or flask as a precaution against sucking back of the contents of the reaction vessel. 

Alternatively, the following procedure for isolating the glycol may be used. Dilute the partly cooled mixture with 250 ml. of water, transfer to a distilling flask, and distil from an oil bath until the temperature reaches 95°. Transfer the hot residue to an apparatus for continuous extraction with ether (e.g.. Fig. II, 44, 2). The extraction is a slow process (36-48 hours) as the glycol is not very soluble in ether. (Benzene may also be employed as the extraction solvent.) Distil off the ether and, after removal of the water and alcohol, distil the glycol under reduced pressure from a Claisen flask. 

Alternatively—and this procedure is recommended—remove the ether with the apparatus shown in Fig. II, 13, 4. A slightly improved yield is obtained if a short fractionating column is used. 

Alternatively, use the following procedure in which triethylamine replaces potassium acetate as the basic catalyst. Place 2 1 g. (2-0 ml.) of purified benzaldehyde, 2 0 ml. of anhydrous triethylamine and 5 0 ml. of A.R. acetic anhydride in a 200 ml. round-bottomed flask, equipped with a short reflux condenser and a calcium chloride drying tube. Boil the solution gently for 24 hours—heating may be interrupted. Incorporate a steam distillation apparatus in the flask and steam distil until the distillate is no longer cloudy (about 100 ml.) and then collect a further 50 ml. of the distillate di ard the steam distillate. Transfer the residue in the flask to a 400 ml. beaker, add water until the vplume is about 200 ml., then 0 2 g. of decolourising carbon, and boil for a few minutes. Filter the hot solution, and acidify the hot filtrate with 1 1 hydrochlorioiaoid... 

This procedure is used to separate crystallized product from solvent or to remove crap and solids from a liquid. Figure 8 shows the proper apparatus to use. The collecting flask is called a side arm flask and to that extended nipple (tee heel) is attached a vacuum source. The thing that is shoved through the rubber stopper is called a Buchner funnel and is usually made of white porcelain or, preferably, PP. The Buchner funnel, when viewed from above, can be seen to have lots of pin holes in the bottom surface of its reservoir. Over this surface is layered a single sheet of rounded filter paper or paper towel. 

Using the microwave Just decreased the reaction time to 3-30minutes. The dudes in the article used a household, 500W Brazilian microwave (Yikesl). They cut a whole in the top of the microwave to allow the condenser apparatus to pass through the oven. They then killed themselves most likely. But not before they were able to scratch down this procedure as they slowly burned to death ... 

METHOD 1 [101, 103] Before a chemist attempts this procedure she should read both of the referenced articles to understand why Strike has included a hybrid apparatus like the one shown in figure 14. 

Technically, the chemist could avoid the complex glassware apparatus of this procedure for a more crude approach [104]. This report shows some dudes de-methylating an amphetamine with concentrated HCI in a pressure cooker. A similar approach with good yields was also employed in ref. 83 and should work as well or better on guaiacol. Hydroiodic acid or hydrobromic acid will work better than hydrochloric acid but, you know, whatever floats the chemist s boat. To do this the chemist can just plain reflux HI or HBr with the guaiacol for a few hours and process as before or she can use HI, HBr or HCI and place the reactants in a pipe bomb for a few hours. 

Safrole from the Grignard reagent Keeping the apparatus from the above reaction, pour 60g of allylbromide into the sep funnel. As with the ingredients of the last procedure the allylbromide must be dried over sodium sulphate. This stuff is really nasty, use a mask at least or a fume cupboard if you can get access to one or fill the sep funnel outdoors. The fumes are invisible and pretty lethal -please be warned. 

Apparatus and procedure Closely similar to the preparation of tert.-Ci,H3MgCl, cyclohexyl-MgCl and cyclopentyl-MgCl (see Exp. 2). The yield (estimated from the results obtained from reactions with this reagent) is at least 90%. Here, too, it is essential to use M-butyl chloride which is free from butyl alcohol. 

Apparatus. For the hydrolysis procedure see Chapter I, Fig. 3 in the procedure below a 1-1 one-necked flask was used and mechanical stirring was not carried out. 

To a mixture of O.BB mol of anhydrous lithium chloride and 100 ml of OMSO was added a solution of 0.40 mol of the acetylenic tosylate (for a general procedure concerning the preparation of acetylenic tosylates, see Chapter VllI-3, Exp. 3) in IBO ml of DMSO. The flask was equipped for vacuum distillation (see Fig. 5). Between the receiver, which was cooled at -75°C, and the water-pump was placed a tube filled with KOH pellets. The apparatus was evacuated (10-20 mmHg) and the flask gradually heated until DMSO began to reflux in the column. The contents of... 

Mercury porosimetry is generally regarded as the best method available for the routine determination of pore size in the macropore and upper mesopore range. The apparatus is relatively simple in principle (though not inexpensive) and the experimental procedure is less demanding than gas adsorption measurements, in either time or skill. Perhaps on account of the simplicity of the method there is some temptation to overlook the assumptions, often tacit, that are involved, and also the potential sources of error. 

---