Priority pollutants, Environmental

Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH, 1977. 

Environmental Applications Although ion-selective electrodes find use in environmental analysis, their application is not as widespread as in clinical analysis. Standard methods have been developed for the analysis of CN , F , NH3, and in water and wastewater. Except for F , however, other analytical methods are considered superior. By incorporating the ion-selective electrode into a flow cell, the continuous monitoring of wastewater streams and other flow systems is possible. Such applications are limited, however, by the electrode s response to the analyte s activity, rather than its concentration. Considerable interest has been shown in the development of biosensors for the field screening and monitoring of environmental samples for a number of priority pollutants. 

Health nd Safety Factors. Isophorone is considered moderately toxic by ingestion and skin contact. Some rat tumor formation evidence has been found (264), but no demonstration as a human carcinogen has been proven. Isophorone is considered an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) priority pollutant, and has a permissible acute toxicity concentration of 117, 000 ///L to protect freshwater aquatic life, 12, 900 ///L to protect saltwater aquatic life, and 5, 200 ///L to protect human life (265). Isophorone is mildly toxic by inhalation, but because of its low volatiUty it is not a serious vapor hazard. 

M. A. CaUahan and co-workers, Water-Related Environmental Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants, Vol. 1, EPA-440/4-79/029a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 17-1—17-11. 

EPA. 1979. Water-related environmental fate of 129 priority pollutants. Vol. I Introduction and technical background, metals and inorganics, pesticides and PCB s. Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Planning and Standards. EPA-440/4-79-029a, 27.1-27.16. 

Fowler, C. F. Freed, J. R. Jennings, P. Durfee, R. L. Whitmore, F. C. Maestri, B. Mabey, W. R. Holt, B. R. Gould, C. "Water Related Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants, Volume I" U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Planning and Standards Washington, DC, 1979 EPA... 

Callahan, M.A. et at "Water Environmental Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants" EPA Publication 440/4-79-029a, 1979. 

The output of an exposure and risk assessment will usually describe the levels of exposure and quantity the population exposed for both humans and other biota, and will estimate the associated probabilities of the incidence of adverse health effects. Population exposure or risk, obtained by multiplying the individual (per capita) exposure or risk by the numbers exposed at each level of exposure, may also be a useful measure of impact. Various analyses can be performed on the results, for example, comparison of exposures in a particular geographic area against national average exposure levels. Likewise, for the same pollutant, environmental risks due to a particular industry might be compared against risks associated with occupational or household activities. In addition, the health risk of different substances could be compared for priority setting. 

Howard PH (1991) Handbook of environmental fate and exposure data for organic chemicals, vol I Large production and priority pollutants. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 107-292... 

McMahon LW. 1983. Organic priority pollutants in wastewater. Proceedings of the 1982 UCC-ND/GAT Environmental Protection Seminar. Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 

Warner, P.H., Cohen, J.M., Ireland, J.C. (1987) Determination of Henry s Law Constants of Selected Priority Pollutants. NTIS PB87-212684, EPA/600/D-87/229, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 

Apart from of investigating the concentration of priority pollutants to assess the temporal and geographic trends as it has been done in the Ebro river basin until nowadays, the SCARCE project pretends to evaluate the consequences of the climate change in the water quality as well as predicting new environmental risks derived from water scarcity. This will be done by determining the presence of new priority (i.e. perfluorinated compounds) and emerging toxicants in Mediterranean river ecosystems in the Iberian Peninsula. In a subsequent step, the effects of chemical and environmental stressors on the biota will be assessed by combining field and experimental studies. The effects of multiple stressors will be addressed from a multi-biomarker perspective [27]. 

Among all chlorophenols, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) and pentachlorophenol (PCP) are listed as priority pollutants by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (IRIS electronic database) and the EU [256]. In particular, PCP has been classified as a B2 probable carcinogen for humans from animal toxicity studies and human clinical data. 

Keith et al. [36] and Reijnders et al. [37] reviewed applications of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to sediment analysis. Lopez-Avila et al. [38] investigated the efficiency of dichloromethane extraction procedures for the isolation of organic compounds from sediments prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The compounds investigated were the 51 priority pollutants listed by the Environmental Protection Agency, USA. 

Staples CA, Wemer AF, Hoogheem TJ. 1985. Assessment of priority pollutant concentrations in the United States using STORET database. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 4 131-142. 

Howard, P. H., 1989, Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals, Volume I, Large Production and Priority Pollutants. Lewis Publishers,... 

EPA. 1982. Aquatic fate process data for organic priority pollutants. Washington, DC Monitoring and Data Support Division, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Report No. 440/4-81-014. 

---