Principal components statistical test

The authors wanted to select indicators that specifically tap melancholic depression. To evaluate this construct, a principal components analysis of the joint pool of K-SADS and BDI items was performed. Two independent statistical tests suggested a two-component solution, but the resulting components appeared to reflect method factors, rather than substantive factors. Specifically, all of the BDI items loaded on the first component (except for three items that did not load on either component) and nearly all of the K-SADS items loaded on the second component. In fact, the first component correlated. 98 with the BDI and the second component correlated. 93 with the K-SADS. Ambrosini et al., however, concluded that the first component reflected depression severity and the second component reflected melancholic depression. This interpretation was somewhat at odds with the data. Specifically, the second component included some K-SADS items that did not tap symptoms of melancholia (e.g., irritability and anger) and did not include some BDI items that measure symptoms of melancholia (e.g., loss of appetite). 

Correlations are inherent in chemical processes even where it can be assumed that there is no correlation among the data. Principal component analysis (PCA) transforms a set of correlated variables into a new set of uncorrelated ones, known as principal components, and is an effective tool in multivariate data analysis. In the last section we describe a method that combines PCA and the steady-state data reconciliation model to provide sharper, and less confounding, statistical tests for gross errors. 

Consequently, instead of looking at a statistical test for r, we can perform the hypothesis test on p. Tong and Crowe (1995) proposed the following test for a principal component ... 

Each pi statistic is tested against the threshold value of 1.96, which corresponds to a 95% confidence level. The last principal component results in suspect. The contributions from each residual of the constraints to the principal components are given in Fig. 18. From this figure we see that the residuals of units 1 and 2 are the main contributions to all the principal components and in particular to p4. The flowrates involved in units 1 and 2 are fa, fa, fa, fa, fa- Because fa and ft, are related to unit 3, which is not suspect, and fa participates in the unsuspected unit 4, we can conclude that the only bias measurements are fa, fa, as was simulated. 

Finally, a method for dealing with the inherent correlation existing in chemical processes was discussed. This method combines principal component analysis (PCA) and the steady-state data reconciliation model to provide sharper and less confounding statistical tests for gross errors. 

We computed an analysis of variance over Table 1, followed by tests of specific effects. Two results were statistically significant. Random selection of compounds was better than cluster or space-filling selection. BCUT descriptors were better for analysis than either of the principal component descriptor sets. 

Once the toxicity parameters were computed to a spreadsheet yielding a table of 30 rows (effluents) and 9 columns (bioassays), we ran a principal component analysis (PCA) to check the diversity patterns of effluents and the correlation between tests. The PCA calculations were carried out using the ADE 3.6 statistical package on a Macintosh computer. ADE was developed by the University of Lyon II and by the French National Centre of Scientific Research (CNRS) common biometry laboratory. The new version ADE version 4 running on Mac and PC computers is now available on this university s internet site at http //pbil.univ-lvon 1. fr/ADE-4/... 

The application of methods of multivariate statistics (here demonstrated with examples of cluster analysis, multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis, and principal components analysis) enables clarification of the lateral structure of the types of feature change within a test area. 

The predictivity of this model to external compounds was further evaluated by splitting the dataset into a training set of 83 compounds and a test set of 10 molecules. One approach was to use the test set from Colmenarejo et al. (2001 model B), while another test set was generated using statistical design after a principal component analysis (PCA) on VolSurf descriptors (model A). The design was done by selecting... 

Comparison and ranking of sites according to chemical composition or toxicity is done by multivariate nonparametric or parametric statistical methods however, only descriptive methods, such as multidimensional scaling (MDS), principal component analysis (PCA), and factor analysis (FA), show similarities and distances between different sites. Toxicity can be evaluated by testing the environmental sample (as an undefined complex mixture) against a reference sample and analyzing by inference statistics, for example, t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). 

A technique derived from a principal components approach is the coupling of PCA with redundancy analysis (RDA) (van der Brink et al. 1996). The utility of the technique is that it provides a depiction of the treatment trajectories in an ecological space, and the statistical significance can be examined using a permutation test. One of the proposed benefits of the technique is that it can determine recovery, a dubious distinction in light of the ground work laid in Chapter 2. In common with other PCA techniques, the technique does assume a linear response. 

In both studies, nonmetric clustering outperformed the metric tests, although both principal components analysis and correspondence analysis yielded some additional insight into large-scaled patterns, which was not provided by the nonmetric clustering results. However, nonmetric clustering provided information without the use of inappropriate assumptions, data transformations, or other dataset manipulations that usually accompany the use of multivariate metric statistics. The success of these studies and techniques led to the examination of community dynamics in a series of two multispecies toxicity tests. 

The ultimate development in the field of sample preparation is to eliminate it completely, that is, to make a chemical measurement directly without any sample pretreatment. This has been achieved with the application of chemometric near-infrared methods to direct analysis of pharmaceutical tablets and other pharmaceutical solids (74-77). Chemometrics is the use of mathematical and statistical correlation techniques to process instrumental data. Using these techniques, relatively raw analytical data can be converted to specific quantitative information. These methods have been most often used to treat near-infrared (NIR) data, but they can be applied to any instrumental measurement. Multiple linear regression or principal-component analysis is applied to direct absorbance spectra or to the mathematical derivatives of the spectra to define a calibration curve. These methods are considered secondary methods and must be calibrated using data from a primary method such as HPLC, and the calibration material must be manufactured using an equivalent process to the subject test material. However, once the calibration is done, it does not need to be repeated before each analysis. 

A useful method to test the overall impact a subject has on the parameters is to first perform principal component analysis (PCA) on the estimated model parameters. PCA is a multivariate statistical method the object of which is to take a set of p-variables, (Xi,X2,. ..Xn = X and find linear functions of X to produce a new set of uncorrelated variables Z, Z2,. .. Zn such that Zi contains the largest amount of variability, Z2 contains the second largest, etc. 

Schlich et al. (1987) proposed a new approach to selecting variables in principal component analysis (PCA) and getting correlations between sensory and instrumental data. Among other studies, Wada et al. (1987a,b) evaluated 39 trade varieties of coffee by coupling gas chromatographic data with two kinds of multivariate analysis. The objective classification was compared with the sensory data (cup test), directly or after statistical treatment. The results were concordant. Murota (1993) used qualitative sensory data to interpret further the results of GC data and canonical discriminant analysis. He could thus suggest which were the components responsible for the flavor characteristics in different coffee cultivars. 

---