Preparation by sequential polymerization

The living ROP of e-CL is usually initiated by aluminum isopropoxide, [Al(0 Pr)3] in toluene at 0-25 °C. Under these conditions this initiator exists as an aggregate of trimers and tetramers. However, freshly distilled Al(0 Pr)3 consists mainly of trimers, and is a more reactive initiator for ROP. The initiation rate is high compared to the rate of propagation so that a narrow molecular weight distribution is obtained in the polymer. There is no termination reaction and 3 chains grow per Al atom. Block polymers have been prepared by sequential polymerization of e-CL (monomer A) and DXO (monomer B) using Al(0 Pr)3 as an initiator in THF at 0 °C to yield AB or BA di-block copolymers [95]. 

The ABA triblocks which have been most exploited commercially are of the styrene-diene-styrene type, prepared by sequential polymerization initiated by alkyllithium compounds as shown in Eqs. (99-101) [263, 286]. The behavior of these block copolymers illustrates the special characteristics of block (and graft) copolymers, which are based on the general incompatibility of the different blocks [287]. Thus for a typical thermoplastic elastomer (263), the polystyrene end blocks (-15,000-20,000 MW) aggregate into a separate phase, which forms a microdispersion within the matrix composed of the polydiene chains (50,000-70,000 MW) [288-290]. A schematic representation of this morphology is shown in Fig. 3. This phase separation, which occurs in the melt (or swollen) state, results, at ambient temperatures, in a network of... 

Whereas diblock copolymers were mainly prepared by sequential polymerizations of two different monomers, triblock copolymers were generally obtained by divergent chain growth from a difunctional alkoxyamine (Table 6). However, a few examples report consecutive polymerization of three different monomers from monofunctional initiators (Table 7). TEMPO and TEMPO-like nitroxides were almost exclusively employed for the polymerization of styrenic derivatives. The versatility of TIPNO and SGI nitroxides allowed greater flexibility regarding the range of monomer that can be controlled. Consequently, they have been intensively employed for the design of a myriad of block copolymers. 

Block copolymer—These copolymers are built of chemically dissimilar terminally connected segments. Block copolymers are generally prepared by sequential anionic addition or ring opening or step growth polymerization. 

Anionic polymerization and suitable Unking chemistry were employed for the synthesis of 3-arm PCHD-fc-PS star-block copolymers with PCHD either as the inner or the outer block (Scheme 77) [153]. The block copolymers were prepared by sequential addition of monomers. It was shown that the crossover reaction of either PSIi or PCHDLi was efficient and led to well-defined block copolymers. However, in the case of the PCHD-fc-PSLi copolymers, longer polymerization times were needed for long PCHD... 

A series of bis(phenoxide) aluminum alkoxides have also been reported as lactone ROP initiators. Complexes (264)-(266) all initiate the well-controlled ROP of CL, NVL.806,807 and L-LA.808 Block copolymers have been prepared by sequential monomer addition, and resumption experiments (addition of a second aliquot of monomer to a living chain) support a living mechanism. The polymerizations are characterized by narrow polydispersities (1.20) and molecular weights close to calculated values. However, other researchers using closely related (267) have reported Mw/Mn values of 1.50 and proposed that an equilibrium between dimeric and monomeric initiator molecules was responsible for an efficiency of 0.36.809 In addition, the polymerization of LA using (268) only achieved a conversion of 15% after 5 days at 80 °C (Mn = 21,070, Mn calc 2,010, Mw/Mn = 1.46).810... 

The additional complexity present in block copolymer synthesis is the order of monomer polymerization and/or the requirement in some cases to modify the reactivity of the propagating center during the transition from one block to the next block. This is due to the requirement that the nucleophilicity of the initiating block be equal or greater than the resulting propagating chain end of the second block. Therefore the synthesis of block copolymers by sequential polymerization generally follows the order dienes/styrenics before vinylpyridines before meth(acrylates) before oxiranes/siloxanes. As a consequence, styrene-MMA block copolymers should be prepared by initial polymerization of styrene followed by MMA, while PEO-MMA block copolymers should be prepared by... 

Considerable effort has been carried out by different groups in the preparation of amphiphihc block copolymers based on polyfethylene oxide) PEO and an ahphatic polyester. A common approach relies upon the use of preformed co- hydroxy PEO as macroinitiator precursors [51, 70]. Actually, the anionic ROP of ethylene oxide is readily initiated by alcohol molecules activated by potassium hydroxide in catalytic amounts. The equimolar reaction of the PEO hydroxy end group (s) with triethyl aluminum yields a macroinitiator that, according to the coordination-insertion mechanism previously discussed (see Sect. 2.1), is highly active in the eCL and LA polymerization. This strategy allows one to prepare di- or triblock copolymers depending on the functionality of the PEO macroinitiator (Scheme 13a,b). Diblock copolymers have also been successfully prepared by sequential addition of the cyclic ether (EO) and lactone monomers using tetraphenylporphynato aluminum alkoxides or chloride as the initiator [69]. 

Narrowly distributed Pl-ft-PS-i-PI triblock copolymer chains with both of their ends capped with bromobutyl groups were prepared by sequential addition of living anionic polymerization and terminated by excess of 1,4-dibromobutane (PS block Mw = 3.5 x 103 g/mol PI blocks Mw = 3.1 x 103 g/mol Mw/Mn = 1.12 The degree of end-functionalization was 92% characterized by HNMR). Figure 6 shows the SEC profile of such prepared triblock copolymer chains. The small but a detectable amount ( 5%) of Pl-i-PS-i-PI dimers, PI-Z>-PS-Z>-PI-c-PI-Z>-PS-Z>-PI, is presumably formed via the Wurtz-type coupling reaction. 

A macromonomer made of a block copolymer of p-MeS and P-pinene was also prepared by sequential living cationic polymerization of both monomers under the same experimental conditions. The first block had 12 p-MeS units and the second had 11 p-pinene units as evaluated by NMR spectroscopy. 

The synthetic procedure for the synthesis of the inverse starblock copolymers is given in Scheme 25. Diblock arms (I) having the living end at the PS chain end were prepared by anionic polymerization with sequential addition of monomers. In order to accelerate the crossover reaction from the PILi to the PSLi chain end a small quantity of THF was added prior the addition of styrene. The living diblock (I) solution was added dropwise to a stoichiometric amount of SiCl4 until two arms are linked to the silane. This step was monitored by SEC and is similar to a titration process. The end point of the titration was determined by the appearance of a small quantity ( 1%) of trimer in the SEC trace. The diblock (I) was selected over the diblock (II) due to the increased steric hindrance of the styryl anion over the isoprenyl anion, which makes easier the control of the incorporation of only two arms into the silane. 

The first report is available from Shen et al. who studied the preparation of BR/IR block copolymers by sequential polymerization of BD and IP [92]. Shen et al. found that the polymerization of the second monomer batch resulted in an increase of solution viscosity by 100%. The viscosity increase was considered as strong evidence in favor of block copolymer formation. Further evidence came from stress strain measurements in which the respective BD/IP block copolymers were compared with blends of BR and IR (at the same molar masses). It was found that the block copolymer exhibited higher elongation at break and higher tensile strength. Unfortunately, Mn data were not provided. Therefore, these results are not fully relevant regarding requirement No. 5 for a living polymerization. 

Diblock, triblock, and multiblock copolymers are typically prepared by sequential monomer addition to polymerization systems in which the chain-breaking reactions are sufficiently suppressed. Polymer properties can thereby be varied by manipulating the constituent blocks compatibilities, hydrophilicities/hydrophobicities, and hardness/softness. New and/ or novel topologies can also be prepared by controlled processes, including cyclic polymers and/or copolymers, comb-like macromolecules, and star polymers. The synthetic range of cationic vinyl polymerizations will be discussed in detail in Chapter 5. 

Back-biting reaction occurring during cationic polymerization of lactams is detrimental to preparation of block copolymers of two different lactams by sequential polymerization. Block copolymers can be obtained only in those systems in which the rate of polymerization of the second monomer is much higher than the rate of chain transfer to polymer resulting in transamidation [219]. 

Polymers and copolymers were laboratory-prepared samples. Samples W4 and W7 of the diblock copolymer AB poly(styrene-fo-tetramethylene oxide) (PS—PT) were synthesized by producing a polystyrene prepolymer whose terminal group was transformed to a macroinitiator for the polymerization of THF. Samples B13 and B16 of the diblock copolymer AB poly[styrene-h-(dimethyl siloxane)] (PS-PDMS) were prepared by sequential anionic polymerization. Samples of statistical copolymers of styrene and n-butyl methacrylate (PSBMA) were produced by radical copolymerization. Details of synthetic and characterization methods have been reported elsewhere (15, 17-19). 

Various block copolymers with functional groups can be prepared by direct block copolymerization of functional monomers or by sequential polymerizations of their protected forms, followed by deprotection (Figure 18). 

---