Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predictive multiple-reaction

Bauer et al. describe the use of a noncontact probe coupled by fiber optics to an FT-Raman system to measure the percentage of dry extractibles and styrene monomer in a styrene/butadiene latex emulsion polymerization reaction using PLS models [201]. Elizalde et al. have examined the use of Raman spectroscopy to monitor the emulsion polymerization of n-butyl acrylate with methyl methacrylate under starved, or low monomer [202], and with high soUds-content [203] conditions. In both cases, models could be built to predict multiple properties, including solids content, residual monomer, and cumulative copolymer composition. Another study compared reaction calorimetry and Raman spectroscopy for monitoring n-butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate and for vinyl acetate/butyl acrylate, under conditions of normal and instantaneous conversion [204], Both techniques performed well for normal conversion conditions and for overall conversion estimate, but Raman spectroscopy was better at estimating free monomer concentration and instantaneous conversion rate. However, the authors also point out that in certain situations, alternative techniques such as calorimetry can be cheaper, faster, and often easier to maintain accurate models for than Raman spectroscopy, hi a subsequent article, Elizalde et al. found that updating calibration models after... [Pg.223]

When the rate equation is complex, the values predicted by the two models are not necessarily limiting. Complexities can arise from multiple reactions, variation of density or pressure or temperature, incomplete mixing of feed streams, minimax rate behavior as in autocatalytic processes, and possibly other behaviors. Sensitivity of the reaction to the mixing pattern can be established in such cases, but the nature of the conversion limits will not be ascertained. Some other, possibly more realistic models will have to be devised to represent the reaction behavior. The literature has many examples of models but not really any correlations (Naumann and Buffham, 1983 Wen and Fan Westerterp et al., 1984). [Pg.560]

Especially in the past, the kinetics of pyrolyses have often been reported as being proportional to the concentration of the feed hydrocarbon raised to some power. In such cases, the reaction order tends to shift to higher values with increased conversions and temperatures. These oversimplified models fail to account for the multiple reactions and products, but are reasonably successful for predicting the reactions, especially those at low conversions. [Pg.537]

For wideranging studies of multiple reaction channels conventional RRKM theory with Eckart tunneling provides a readily implemented methodology that generally provides meaningful predictions. Consider for example the self-... [Pg.65]

For multiple-reaction systems the maximum selectivity for a given product will require operation at a different temperature for each location in the reactor. However, it is rarely of value to find this optimum temperature-vs-position relationship because of the practical difficulty in achieving a specified temperature profile. It is important to be able to predict the general t)q)e of profile that will give the optimum yield, for it may be possible to design the reactor to conform to this general trend. These comments apply equally to batch reactors, w here the temperature-time relationship rather than the temperature-position profile is pertinent. [Pg.213]

Note that Eq. 6.1.25 provides only an estimate on the range of the value of HTN. We select a specific value after examining the reactor performance for different values of HTN. It is important to examine the reactor design for different values of HTN, since, when multiple reactions occur, it is difficult to predict the effect of the heat transfer on the relative rates of the individual reactions. Once the physical reactor vessel has been designed, it is necessary to verify that its configuration (S/V) and the agitation conditions actually provide the desired value of HTN. [Pg.165]

In Pan 2 we will learn how to use the residence time data and functions to make predictions of conversion and exit concentrations. Because the residence time distribution is not unique for a given reaction system, we must use new models if we want to predict the conversion in our nonideal reactor. We present the five most common models to predict conversion and then close the chapter by applying two of these models, the segregation model and the maximum mixedness model, to single and to multiple reactions. [Pg.867]

Unfortunately, few of the published studies of extraction equilibria heve provided complete quantitative models that are useful for extrapolation of data or for predicting multiple metal distribution equilibria from single metal data. The chemical-reaction equilibrium formulation provides a framework for constructing such models. One of the drawbacks of purely empirical correlations of distribution coefficients is that pH has often been chosen as an independent variable. Such a choice is suggested by the form of Pigs. 8-3-5 and 8.3-8. Although pH is readily measured and contmlled on a laboratory scale, it is really a dependent variable, which is detenmined by mass belances and simultaneous reaction equilibria. An appropriate phare-equilibrium model should be able to predict equilibrium pH, at least within a moderate activity coefficient correction, concurrently with other species concemrations. [Pg.486]

When consecutive or parallel reactions are carried out between a gas and a liquid, the concentration gradients near the interface may influence the selectivity as well as the overall rate of reaction. For chlorination or partial oxidation of hydrocarbons, several workers have reported that the yield of intermediate products was influenced by agitation variables [6,7] and was less than predicted from the kinetic constants. Rigorous analysis of multiple reactions is complex, but film theory can be used to show when mass transfer effects are likely to change the selectivity [8]. [Pg.283]


See other pages where Predictive multiple-reaction is mentioned: [Pg.492]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.2827]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.993]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.2827]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.298]   


SEARCH



Multiple reactions

Predictive multiple reaction monitoring

Reaction multiple reactions

Reaction prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info