Polymers solutions, virial coefficients

Here R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, A2 is the second virial coefficient and A3 is the third virial coefficient. This equation should be compared to the virial expansion for a real gas. The higher order terms (second and third on the right-hand side of the equation) account for in-termolecular interactions. In an ideal polymer solution, virial coefficients of order two and higher are zero. Such a solution should be compared to an ideal gas, in which there are no intermolecular interactions. The... 

Theta conditions in dilute polymer solutions are similar to tire state of van der Waals gases near tire Boyle temperature. At this temperature, excluded-volume effects and van der Waals attraction compensate each other, so tliat tire second virial coefficient of tire expansion of tire pressure as a function of tire concentration vanishes. On dealing witli solutions, tire quantity of interest becomes tire osmotic pressure IT ratlier tlian tire pressure. Its virial expansion may be written as... 

Our primary interest in the Flory-Krigbaum theory is in the conclusion that the second virial coefficient and the excluded volume depend on solvent-solute interactions and not exclusively on the size of the polymer molecule itself. It is entirely reasonable that this should be the case in light of the discussion in Sec. 1.11 on the expansion or contraction of the coil depending on the solvent. The present discussion incorporates these ideas into a consideration of solution nonideality. 

Many presentations of the second virial coefficient of polymer solutions contain different expressions for the quantities we have discussed. The difference lies in the fact that the factor p( - 0/T) appears in place of 1/2 - x-There are several attitudes we can take toward this difference. For one thing, we can regard the discrepancy as nothing more than different notation ... 

One thing that is apparent at the outset is that polymer molecules in solution are very different species from the rigid spheres upon which the Einstein theory is based. On the other hand, we saw in the last chapter that the random coil contributes an excluded volume to the second virial coefficient that is at least... 

Theta temperature is one of the most important thermodynamic parameters of polymer solutions. At theta temperature, the long-range interactions vanish, segmental interactions become more effective and the polymer chains assume their unperturbed dimensions. It can be determined by light scattering and osmotic pressure measurements. These techniques are based on the fact that the second virial coefficient, A2, becomes zero at the theta conditions. 

This stipulation of the interaction parameter to be equal to 0.5 at the theta temperature is found to hold with values of Xh and Xs equal to 0.5 - x < 2.7 x lO-s, and this value tends to decrease with increasing temperature. The values of = 308.6 K were found from the temperature dependence of the interaction parameter for gelatin B. Naturally, determination of the correct theta temperature of a chosen polymer/solvent system has a great physic-chemical importance for polymer solutions thermodynamically. It is quite well known that the second viiial coefficient can also be evaluated from osmometry and light scattering measurements which consequently exhibits temperature dependence, finally yielding the theta temperature for the system under study. However, the evaluation of second virial... 

The analogy with the virial expansion of PF for a real gas in powers of 1/F, where the excluded volume occupies an equivalent role, is obvious. If the gas molecules can be regarded as point particles which exert no forces on one another, u = 0, the second and higher virial coefficients (42, Azy etc.) vanish, and the gas behaves ideally. Similarly in the dilute polymer solutions when w = 0, i.e., at 1 = , Eqs. (70), (71), and (72) reduce to vanT Hoff s law... 

A3 AIBN c Cp DLS DLVO DSC EO GMA HS-DSC KPS LCST Osmotic third virial coefficient 2,2 -Azobis(isobutyronitrile) Polymer concentration Partial heat capacity Dynamic light scattering Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek Differential scanning calorimetry Ethylene oxide Glycidylmethacrylate High-sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry Potassium persulphate Lower critical solution temperature... 

The crucial question is at what value of <)> is the attraction high enough to induce phase separation De Hek and Vrij (6) assume that the critical flocculation concentration is equivalent to the phase separation condition defined by the spinodal point. From the pair potential between two hard spheres in a polymer solution they calculate the second virial coefficient B2 for the particles, and derive from the spinodal condition that if B2 = 1/2 (where is the volume fraction of particles in the dispersion) phase separation occurs. For a system in thermodynamic equilibrium, two phases coexist if the chemical potential of the hard spheres is the same in the dispersion and in the floe phase (i.e., the binodal condition). 

Further development of the Flory-Huggins method in direction of taking into account the effects of far interaction, swelling of polymeric ball in good solvents [4, 5], difference of free volumes of polymer and solvent [6, 7] leaded to complication of expression for virial coefficient A and to growth of number of parameters needed for its numerical estimation, but weakly reflected on the possibility of equation (1) to describe the osmotic pressure of polymeric solutions in a wide range of concentrations. 

Other dilute solution properties depend also on LCB. For example, the second virial coefficient (A2) is reduced due to LCB. However, near the Flory 0 temperature, where A2 = 0 for linear polymers, branched polymers are observed to have apparent positive values of A2 [35]. This is now understood to be due to a more important contribution of the third virial coefficient near the 0 point in branched than in linear polymers. As a consequence, the experimental 0 temperature, defined as the temperature where A2 = 0 is lower in branched than in linear polymers [36, 37]. Branched polymers have also been found to have a wider miscibility range than linear polymers [38], As a consequence, high MW highly branched polymers will tend to coprecipitate with lower MW more lightly branched or linear polymers in solvent/non-solvent fractionation experiments. This makes fractionation according to the extent of branching less effective. 

This is made possible by considering the second virial coefficients of polymers in the various solvents after different solution histories. The second virial coefficient,... 

Qualitative characterization of the polymer-solvent interaction. A solution of a polymer in a beher solvent is characterized by a higher value of the second virial coefficient than a solution of the same polymer in a poorer solvent. 

State of a polymer solution for which the second virial coefficient is zero. 

The properties of solutions of macromolecular substances depend on the solvent, the temperature, and the molecular weight of the chain molecules. Hence, the (average) molecular weight of polymers can be determined by measuring the solution properties such as the viscosity of dilute solutions. However, prior to this, some details have to be known about the solubility of the polymer to be analyzed. When the solubility of a polymer has to be determined, it is important to realize that macromolecules often show behavioral extremes they may be either infinitely soluble in a solvent, completely insoluble, or only swellable to a well-defined extent. Saturated solutions in contact with a nonswollen solid phase, as is normally observed with low-molecular-weight compounds, do not occur in the case of polymeric materials. The suitability of a solvent for a specific polymer, therefore, cannot be quantified in terms of a classic saturated solution. It is much better expressed in terms of the amount of a precipitant that must be added to the polymer solution to initiate precipitation (cloud point). A more exact measure for the quality of a solvent is the second virial coefficient of the osmotic pressure determined for the corresponding solution, or the viscosity numbers in different solvents. 

The alternative value, which describes the polymer-solvent interaction is the second virial coefficient, A2 from the power series expressing the colligative properties of polymer solutions such as vapor pressure, conventional light scattering, osmotic pressure, etc. The second virial coefficient in [mL moH] assumes the small positive values for coiled macromolecules dissolved in the thermodynamically good solvents. Similar to %, also the tabulated A2 values for the same polymer-solvent systems are often rather different [37]. There exists a direct dependence between A2 and % values [37]. 

The unconventional applications of SEC usually produce estimated values of various characteristics, which are valuable for further analyses. These embrace assessment of theta conditions for given polymer (mixed solvent-eluent composition and temperature Section 16.2.2), second virial coefficients A2 [109], coefficients of preferential solvation of macromolecules in mixed solvents (eluents) [40], as well as estimation of pore size distribution within porous bodies (inverse SEC) [136-140] and rates of diffusion of macromolecules within porous bodies. Some semiquantitative information on polymer samples can be obtained from the SEC results indirectly, for example, the assessment of the polymer stereoregularity from the stability of macromolecular aggregates (PVC [140]), of the segment lengths in polymer crystallites after their controlled partial degradation [141], and of the enthalpic interactions between unlike polymers in solution (in eluent) [142], as well as between polymer and column packing [123,143]. 

Most liquid-crystalline polymer solutions have a large second virial coefficient ( > 10 4 cm 3mol/g2) [41], which means that it is rather difficult to find poor or theta solvents for these polymers and that liquid-crystalline polymers in solution interact repulsively. This fact is essential in formulating their static solution properties (osmotic pressure, phase separation, etc.). 

In Flory s theory (/< ), a polymer-solvent system is characterized by a temperature 0 at which (i) excluded-volume effects are just balanced by polymer-solvent interactions, so that os=l, (ii) the second virial coefficient is zero, irrespective of the MW of the polymer, and (iii) the polymer, of infinite molecular weight, is just completely miscible with the solvent The fundamental definition of the temperature is a macroscopic one, namely that for T near 0 the excess chemical potential of the solvent in a solution of polymer volume fraction v2 is of the form (18) ... 

Another important application of experimentally determined values of the osmotic second virial coefficient is in the estimation of the corresponding values of the Flory-Huggins interaction parameters x 12, X14 and X24. In practice, these parameters are commonly used within the framework of the Flory-Huggins lattice model approach to the thermodynamic description of solutions of polymer + solvent or polymer] + polymer2 + solvent (Flory, 1942 Huggins, 1942 Tanford, 1961 Zeman and Patterson, 1972 Hsu and Prausnitz, 1974 Johansson et al., 2000) ... 

Under the conditions of screening of electrostatic interactions between polyions, as occurs at high ionic strength (say, / > 0.1 mol dm- ), or in solutions containing neutral (non-ionic) polymers, the excluded volume term is the leading term in the theoretical equation for the second virial coefficient. In this latter type of situation, the sizes and conformation/ architecture of the biopolymer molecules/particles become of substantial importance. 

If we turn from phenomenological thermodynamics to statistical thermodynamics, then we can interpret the second virial coefficient in terms of molecular parameters via a model. We pursue this approach for two different models, namely, the excluded-volume model for solute molecules with rigid structures and the Flory-Huggins model for polymer chains, in Section 3.4. 

---