Polymerization, anionic polar solvent effects

Anionic polymerization of vinyl monomers can be effected with a variety of organometaUic compounds alkyllithium compounds are the most useful class (1,33—35). A variety of simple alkyllithium compounds are available commercially. Most simple alkyllithium compounds are soluble in hydrocarbon solvents such as hexane and cyclohexane and they can be prepared by reaction of the corresponding alkyl chlorides with lithium metal. Methyllithium [917-54-4] and phenyllithium [591-51-5] are available in diethyl ether and cyclohexane—ether solutions, respectively, because they are not soluble in hydrocarbon solvents vinyllithium [917-57-7] and allyllithium [3052-45-7] are also insoluble in hydrocarbon solutions and can only be prepared in ether solutions (38,39). Hydrocarbon-soluble alkyllithium initiators are used directiy to initiate polymerization of styrene and diene monomers quantitatively one unique aspect of hthium-based initiators in hydrocarbon solution is that elastomeric polydienes with high 1,4-microstmcture are obtained (1,24,33—37). Certain alkyllithium compounds can be purified by recrystallization (ethyllithium), sublimation (ethyllithium, /-butyUithium [594-19-4] isopropyllithium [2417-93-8] or distillation (j -butyUithium) (40,41). Unfortunately, / -butyUithium is noncrystaUine and too high boiling to be purified by distiUation (38). Since methyllithium and phenyllithium are crystalline soUds which are insoluble in hydrocarbon solution, they can be precipitated into these solutions and then redissolved in appropriate polar solvents (42,43). OrganometaUic compounds of other alkaU metals are insoluble in hydrocarbon solution and possess negligible vapor pressures as expected for salt-like compounds. 

The propagation rate constant and the polymerization rate for anionic polymerization are dramatically affected by the nature of both the solvent and the counterion. Thus the data in Table 5-10 show the pronounced effect of solvent in the polymerization of styrene by sodium naphthalene (3 x 1CT3 M) at 25°C. The apparent propagation rate constant is increased by 2 and 3 orders of magnitude in tetrahydrofuran and 1,2-dimethoxyethane, respectively, compared to the rate constants in benzene and dioxane. The polymerization is much faster in the more polar solvents. That the dielectric constant is not a quantitative measure of solvating power is shown by the higher rate in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) compared to tetrahydrofuran (THF). The faster rate in DME may be due to a specific solvation effect arising from the presence of two ether functions in the same molecule. 

Copolymerizations of nonpolar monomers with polar monomers such as methyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile are especially comphcated. The effects of solvent and counterion may be unimportant compared to the side reactions characteristic of anionic polymerization of polar monomers (Sec. 5-3b-4). In addition, copolymerization is often hindered by the very low tendency of one of the cross-propagation reactions. For example, polystyryl anions easily add methyl methacrylate but there is little tendency for poly(methyl methacrylate) anions to add styrene. Many reports of styrene-methyl methacrylate (and similar comonomer pairs) copolymerizations are not copolymerizations in the sense discussed in this chapter. 

The anionic polymerization of 1,3-dienes yields different polymer structures depending on whether the propagating center is free or coordinated to a counterion [Morton, 1983 Quirk, 2002 Senyek, 1987 Tate and Bethea, 1985 Van Beylen et al., 1988 Young et al., 1984] Table 8-9 shows typical data for 1,3-butadiene and isoprene polymerizations. Polymerization of 1,3-butadiene in polar solvents, proceeding via the free anion and/or solvent-separated ion pair, favors 1,2-polymerization over 1,4-polymerization. The anionic center at carbon 2 is not extensively delocalized onto carbon 4 since the double bond is not a strong electron acceptor. The same trend is seen for isoprene, except that 3,4-polymerization occurs instead of 1,2-polymerization. The 3,4-double bond is sterically more accessible and has a lower electron density relative to the 1,2-double bond. Polymerization in nonpolar solvents takes place with an increased tendency toward 1,4-polymerization. The effect is most pronounced with... 

The stereoselective polymerization of various acrylates and methacrylates has been studied using initiators such as atkyllithium [Bywater, 1989 Pasquon et al., 1989 Quirk, 1995, 2002]. Table 8-12 illustrates the effects of counterion, solvent, and temperature on the stereochemistry of the anionic polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA). In polar solvents (pyridine and THF versus toluene), the counterion is removed from the vicinity of the propagating center and does not exert an influence on entry of the next monomer unit. The tendency is toward syndiotactic placement via chain end control. The extent of syndiotacticity... 

The elementary reactions of carbocationic polymerizations can be separated into three types. Deactivation of carbenium ions with anions and transfer to counteranion are ion-ion reactions, propagation and transfer to monomer are ion-dipole reactions, and ionization is a dipole-dipole reaction [274]. Ion-ion and dipole-dipole reactions with polar transition states experience the strongest solvent effects. Carbocationic propagation is an ion-dipole reaction in which a growing carbenium ion adds electro-philically to an alkene it should be weakly accelerated in less polar solvents because the charge is more dispersed in the transition state than in the ground state [276]. However, a model addition reaction of bis(p-methoxyphenyl)carbenium ions to 2-methyl- 1-pentene is two times faster in nitroethane (e = 28) than in methylene chloride (e = 9) at - 30° C [193]. However, this is a minor effect which corresponds to only ddG = 2 kJ morit may also be influenced by specific solvation, polarizability, etc. [276,277]. 

Here [Pf ] is the concentration of growing centres ending in monomer x and kx y is the absolute rate coefficient of reaction of P with monomer y. Two difficulties arise in anionic polymerization. In hydrocarbon solvents with lithium and sodium based initiators, [Pf ] is not the total concentration of polymer units ending in unit x but, due to self-association phenomena, only that part in an active form. The reactivity ratios determined are, however, unaffected by the association phenomena. As each ratio refers to a common active centre, the effective concentration of active species is reduced equally to both monomers. In polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, this difficulty does not arise, but there will be two types of each reactive centre Pf, one an anion and the other an ion-pair. Application of eqn. (22) will give apparent rate coefficients as discussed in Section 4 if total concentrations of Pf are used. Reactivities can change with concentration if defined on this basis. 

Ethylene Oxide The anionic polymerization of ethylene oxide is complicated by the association phenomenon and the participation of ion-pair and free ion intermediates in the propagation reactions [129, 130]. Simple lithium alkoxides are strongly associated into hexamers and tetramers even in polar media such as THE and pyridine [130]. As a consequence, lithium alkoxides are unreactive as initiators for the anionic polymerization of oxiranes. Association effects can be minimized by effecting polymerizations in alcohol media or in dipolar aprotic solvents. 

In conclusion, ionic liquids probably caimot be considered as polar solvents, nor as non-polar solvents, nor as polymeric matrixes. Their behavior arises from a fine balancing of entropic and enthalpic contributions that involve all of the interactions inside the ionic liquid and aU of the possible interactions between cations and/or anions and dissolved species. The ability of ionic liquids to affect reactivity is, therefore, much more complicated to rationalize and more parameters must be considered to explain the ionic liquid effect on reaction rate and selectivity than with molecular solvents. 

The possibilities inherent in the anionic copolymerization of butadiene and styrene by means of organolithium initiators, as might have been expected, have led to many new developments. The first of these would naturally be the synthesis of a butadiene-styrene copolymer to match (or improve upon) emulsion-prepared SBR, in view of the superior molecular weight control possible in anionic polymerization. The copolymerization behavior of butadiene (or isoprene) and styrene is shown in Table 2.15 (Ohlinger and Bandermann, 1980 Morton and Huang, 1979 Ells, 1963 Hill et al., 1983 Spirin et al., 1962). As indicated earlier, unlike the free radical type of polymerization, these anionic systems show a marked sensitivity of the reactivity ratios to solvent type (a similar effect is noted for different alkali metal counterions). Thus, in nonpolar solvents, butadiene (or isoprene) is preferentially polymerized initially, to the virtual exclusion of the styrene, while the reverse is true in polar solvents. This has been ascribed (Morton, 1983) to the profound effect of solvation on the structure of the carbon-lithium bond, which becomes much more ionic in such media, as discussed previously. The resulting polymer formed by copolymerization in hydrocarbon media is described as a tapered block copolymer it consists of a block of polybutadiene with little incorporated styrene comonomer followed by a segment with both butadiene and styrene and then a block of polystyrene. The structure is schematically represented below ... 

Solvents influence the rate of free-radical homopolymerization of acrylic acid and its copolymerization with other monomers. Hydrogen-bonding solvents slow down the reaction rates. Due to the electron-withdrawing nature of the ester groups, acrylic and methacrylic ester polymerize by anionic but not by cationic mechanisms. Lithium alkyls are very effective initiators of a-methyl methacrylate polymerization yielding stereospecific polymers.Isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) forms in hydrocarbon solvents. Block copolymers of isotactic and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) form in solvents of medium polarity. Syndiotactic polymers form in polar solvents, like ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, or pyridine. This solvent influence is related to Lewis basicity in the following order ... 

Because of the complicating effects of counterion and solvent associated with anionic polymerization, relatively few reactivity ratios have been determined for anionic systems. Typical reactivity ratios for the anionic copolymerization of styrene and a few other monomers are shown in Table 8.3. Most of the values were determined from the copolymer composition equation [Eq. (7.11) or (7.18)]. A dramatic effect of solvent is seen with styrene-butadiene copolymerization, where a change from the nonpolar hexane to the highly solvating THF reverses the order of reactivity. Again in the case of hydrocarbon solvent, the reaction temperature shows a minimal in uence on reactivity ratios, while in the case of polar solvents, such as THF, the reactivity ratios vary considerably, which has been rationalized by considering the solvation of carbon-lithium bond. Thus as the temperature is increased (from -78°C to 25°C), the extent of solvation by THF is expected to decrease, resulting in more covalent carbon-lithium bond. 

---