Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Poly receivers

Historically, the development of the acrylates proceeded slowly they first received serious attention from Otto Rohm. AcryUc acid (propenoic acid) was first prepared by the air oxidation of acrolein in 1843 (1,2). Methyl and ethyl acrylate were prepared in 1873, but were not observed to polymerize at that time (3). In 1880 poly(methyl acrylate) was reported by G. W. A. Kahlbaum, who noted that on dry distillation up to 320°C the polymer did not depolymerize (4). Rohm observed the remarkable properties of acryUc polymers while preparing for his doctoral dissertation in 1901 however, a quarter of a century elapsed before he was able to translate his observations into commercial reaUty. He obtained a U.S. patent on the sulfur vulcanization of acrylates in 1912 (5). Based on the continuing work in Rohm s laboratory, the first limited production of acrylates began in 1927 by the Rohm and Haas Company in Darmstadt, Germany (6). Use of this class of compounds has grown from that time to a total U.S. consumption in 1989 of approximately 400,000 metric tons. Total worldwide consumption is probably twice that. [Pg.162]

Polymer—polymer iacompatibiHty encapsulation processes can be carried out ia aqueous or nonaqueous media, but thus far have primarily been carried out ia organic media. Core materials encapsulated tend to be polar soHds with a finite degree of water solubiHty. EthylceUulose historically has been the sheU material used. Biodegradable sheU materials such as poly(D,L-lactide) and lactide—glycoHde copolymers have received much attention. In these latter cases, the object has been to produce biodegradable capsules that carry proteias or polypeptides. Such capsules tend to be below 100 p.m ia diameter and are for oral or parenteral administration (9). [Pg.319]

Poly(ethylene oxide) associates in solution with certain electrolytes (48—52). For example, high molecular weight species of poly(ethylene oxide) readily dissolve in methanol that contains 0.5 wt % KI, although the resin does not remain in methanol solution at room temperature. This salting-in effect has been attributed to ion binding, which prevents coagulation in the nonsolvent. Complexes with electrolytes, in particular lithium salts, have received widespread attention on account of the potential for using these materials in a polymeric battery. The performance of soHd electrolytes based on poly(ethylene oxide) in terms of ion transport and conductivity has been discussed (53—58). The use of complexes of poly(ethylene oxide) in analytical chemistry has also been reviewed (59). [Pg.342]

Functional derivatives of polyethylene, particularly poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(acryLic acid) and derivatives, have received attention because of their water-solubility and disposal iato the aqueous environment. Poly(vinyl alcohol) is used ia a wide variety of appHcations, including textiles, paper, plastic films, etc, and poly(acryLic acid) is widely used ia detergents as a builder, a super-absorbent for diapers and feminine hygiene products, for water treatment, ia thickeners, as pigment dispersant, etc (see Vinyl polymers, vinyl alcohol polymers). [Pg.479]

Other blends such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) with cellulose acetate (208), PHA with polycaprolactone (209), poly(lactic acid) with poly(ethylene glycol) (210), chitosan and cellulose (211), poly(lactic acid) with inorganic fillers (212), and PHA and aUphatic polyesters with inorganics (213) are receiving attention. The different blending compositions seem to be limited only by the number of polymers available and the compatibiUty of the components. The latter blends, with all natural or biodegradable components, appear to afford the best approach for future research as property balance and biodegradabihty is attempted. Starch and additives have been evaluated ia detail from the perspective of stmcture and compatibiUty with starch (214). [Pg.482]

Polyarylether Ketones. The aromatic polyether ketones are tme thermoplastics. Although several are commercially available, two resins in particular, poly ether ether ketone [31694-16-3] (PEEK) from ICI and poly ether ketone ketone (PEKK) from Du Pont, have received most of the attention. PEEK was first synthesized in 1981 (20) and has been well studied it is the subject of numerous papers because of its potential use in high performance aircraft. Tough, semicrystalline PEEK is prepared by the condensation of bis(4-fiuorophenyl) ketone with the potassium salt of bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) ketone in a diaryl sulfone solvent, such as diphenyl sulfone. The choice of solvent is critical other solvents, such as Hquid HE, promote the reaction but lead to premature low molecular-weight crystals, which do not exhibit sufficient toughness (21). [Pg.38]

The theory of radiation-induced grafting has received extensive treatment. The direct effect of ionizing radiation in material is to produce active radical sites. A material s sensitivity to radiation ionization is reflected in its G value, which represents the number of radicals in a specific type (e.g., peroxy or allyl) produced in the material per 100 eV of energy absorbed. For example, the G value of poly(vinyl chloride) is 10-15, of PE is 6-8, and of polystyrene is 1.5-3. Regarding monomers, the G value of methyl methacrylate is 11.5, of acrylonitrile is 5.6, and of styrene is >0.69. [Pg.508]

Maleic anhydride, 98 g (1.0 mol), 148 g (1.0 mol) of phthalic anhydride, and 160 g (2.1 mol) of 1,2-propanediol are poly condensed in a three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, a nitrogen inlet, and a distillation head connected to a condenser and a receiver flask. The flask is placed in a salt bath preheated at 160°C. Water begins to distill and the temperature is then raised gradually to 190°C. The polycondensation is stopped (after about 15 h) when the reaction mixture has an acid number of 50 (see Section 2.3.8.4.1) (Scheme 2.54). A slightly different procedure is described in ref. 423. [Pg.101]

Recently siloxane-imide copolymers have received specific attention due to various unique properties displayed by these materials which include fracture toughness, enhanced adhesion, improved dielectric properties, increased solubility, and excellent atomic oxygen resistance 1S3). The first report on the synthesis of poly(siloxane-imides) appeared in 1966, where PMDA (pyromellitic dianhydride) was reacted with an amine-terminated siloxane dimer and subsequently imidized 166>. Two years later, Greber 167) reported the synthesis of a series of poly(siloxane-imide) and poly(siloxane-ester-imide) copolymers using different siloxane backbones. However no physical characterization data were reported. [Pg.33]

Siloxane containing interpenetrating networks (IPN) have also been synthesized and some properties were reported 59,354 356>. However, they have not received much attention. Preparation and characterization of IPNs based on PDMS-polystyrene 354), PDMS-poly(methyl methacrylate) 354), polysiloxane-epoxy systems 355) and PDMS-polyurethane 356) were described. These materials all displayed two-phase morphologies, but only minor improvements were obtained over the physical and mechanical properties of the parent materials. This may be due to the difficulties encountered in controlling the structure and morphology of these IPN systems. Siloxane modified polyamide, polyester, polyolefin and various polyurethane based IPN materials are commercially available 59). Incorporation of siloxanes into these systems was reported to increase the hydrolytic stability, surface release, electrical properties of the base polymers and also to reduce the surface wear and friction due to the lubricating action of PDMS chains 59). [Pg.62]

As noted above, very many patients are treated with poly-psychotropic pharmacy. For the majority of those receiving antipsychotics (patients with schizophrenia and... [Pg.52]

Thirty-five to eighty-seven percent of the patients studied received antiparkinson drugs. Compared to other countries, Japan and Singapore used the most of these antidotes for drug-induced extrapyramidal symptoms. This is most likely related to the frequent use of high-dosage antipsychotic drugs and poly-antipsychotics (see Table 12.3). [Pg.148]

Materials and Purification. Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich chemical company and used as received unless otherwise noted 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyl disilazane, ethylene glycol, triphosgene, poly(ethylene oxide) (MW = 600), poly(tetramethylene oxide) (MW = 1000), poly(caprolactonediol) (MW = 530), toluene diisocyanate (TDI), anhydrous ethanol (Barker Analyzed), L-lysine monohydride (Sigma) and methylene bis-4-phenyl isocyanate (MDI) (Kodak). Ethyl ether (Barker Analyzer), triethylamine and dimethyl acetamide were respectively dried with sodium, calcium hydride and barium oxide overnight, and then distilled. Thionyl chloride and diethylphosphite were distilled before use. [Pg.142]

Poly(2-vinylpyridine), with Mv=36,000, was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. and purified by two precipitations from ethanol into deionized water. CuC12-2H20 (ACS purity) and poly(4-vinylpyridine) from Mallinckrodt and Polysciences Inc. respectively, were used as received. Complexes with different ratios of Cu to pyridine moiety were formed in solution (95% methanol, 5%H20). Due to decreasing solubility of the complex with increasing copper concentration, the concentration of reagents was varied as shown in Table I. [Pg.431]

Figure 17 Permeability of uranine ( ), dextran 4.4K (O), and dextran 150K (A) through cross-linked poly(/V-isopropyl acrylamide-co-butyl methacrylate, 95 5 mol%) membrane. Error bars represent standard deviation in the slope of the curve of the receiver concentration of solute as a function of time at steady state. (From Ref. 37.)... Figure 17 Permeability of uranine ( ), dextran 4.4K (O), and dextran 150K (A) through cross-linked poly(/V-isopropyl acrylamide-co-butyl methacrylate, 95 5 mol%) membrane. Error bars represent standard deviation in the slope of the curve of the receiver concentration of solute as a function of time at steady state. (From Ref. 37.)...
In contrast to poly(3HB), poly(3HAMCL) has not yet been produced on a commercial scale. Consequently, process development for the production and purification of poly(3HB) has received much more attention than processes for the production of poly(3HAMCL). It is interesting therefore to compare parameters for the production of poly(3HAMCL) with those for the production of poly(3HB). Table 3 summarizes the key parameters for the best poly(3HB) [ 101 ] and poly(3HAMCL) [51,55,56] production processes. [Pg.174]


See other pages where Poly receivers is mentioned: [Pg.482]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.1056]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.798]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.37]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.376 ]




SEARCH



Received

Receiving

© 2024 chempedia.info