Polar solvation forces

The formation and transport properties of a large polaron in DNA are discussed in detail by Conwell in a separate chapter of this volume. Further information about the competition of quantum charge delocalization and their localization due to solvation forces can be found in Sect. 10.1. In Sect. 10.1 we also compare a theoretical description of localization/delocalization processes with an approach used to study large polaron formation. Here we focus on the theoretical framework appropriate for analysis of the influence of solvent polarization on charge transport. A convenient method to treat this effect is based on the combination of a tight-binding model for electronic motion and linear response theory for polarization of the water surroundings. To be more specific, let us consider a sequence... 

Polarizability is a measure of the ease with which the electrons of a molecule are distorted. It is the basis for evaluating the nonspecific attraction forces (London dispersion forces) that arise when two molecules approach each other. Each molecule distorts the electron cloud of the other and thereby induces an instantaneous dipole. The induced dipoles then attract each other. Dispersion forces are weak and are most important for the nonpolar solvents where other solvation forces are absent. They do, nevertheless, become stronger the larger the electron cloud, and they may also become important for some of the higher-molecular-weight polar solvents. Large solute particles such as iodide ion interact by this mechanism more strongly than do small ones such as fluoride ion. Furthermore, solvent polarizability may influence rates of certain types of reactions because transition states may be of different polarizability from reactants and so be differently solvated. 

In the constructionist method, aromatic carbons are evaluated from benzene, a solute which has been measured more times than any other. When the phenyl ring is fused to others, as in naphthalene or anthracene, or when it is joined to another, as in biphenyl, there is a change in the effective polarity of the pi electron cloud, and a slight but significant positive correction factor is introduced. Critics may disparagingly refer to these as fudge factors/ but these factors have been very helpful in distinguishing the solvation forces which operate in the two different phases (Taft, 1996). 

Finally, the polarity of the solvent can often determine the mechanism by which reaction occurs, ionization of an alkyl halide is possible only because most of the energy needed to reach the transition state is supplied by formation of dipole-dipole bonds between the solvent and the polar transition state. The more polar the solvent, the stronger the solvation forces and the faster the ionization. 

In a series of publications using this approach, a number of equations were developed that increased our understanding of the solvation forces acting in different media. Quantifying the polarity/polarizability contribution solely from solute structural input proved the most difficult. The Kamlet-Taft group, used dipole-moment squared and the symbol H, while Abraham et ai, used polarity (S) and added excess molar refract vity, E. 

Edge-to-face orientations are frequent motifs also in proteins, and they can be viewed as hydrogen bonds between weakly acidic aromatic C—H bonds and Jt-moieties, and will therefore noi be discussed in detail here. Due to small polarity, the strengths of such bonds are so small that they are mostly observable only in solid-state structures or with intramolecular balances set up to reflect particular interactions by changes in conformational equihbria. However, it was concluded on the basis of force field calculations, including a solvation model, that van der Waals and solvation forces play a decisive role in the conformational equihbrium involving C—H—it bonds. ... 

As noted above, surfactant adsorption may be described in terms of simple interaction parameters. However, in some cases these interaction parameters may involve ill-defined forces, such as hydrophobic bonding, solvation forces and chemisorption. In addition, the adsorption of ionic surfactants involves electrostatic forces, particularly with polar surfaces containing ionogenic groups. Thus, the adsorption of ionic and nonionic surfactants will be treated separately. Surfaces (substrates) can be also hydrophobic or hydrophilic and these may be treated separately. 

---