Plants variability

Harward and Treshow exposed 15 species, representative of the aspen plant community, to ozone at 0, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.30 ppm and ambient air during the growing season and reported effects in all species at the highest pollution concentration (Table 11-6). There was considerable plant variability, and only six species reproduced. However, vigor was reduced and most species were sensitive. Price and Treshow found major biomass reductions in six grass and two tree species exposed for 4 h/day to ozone at 0.15-0.33 ppm over a growing season. They also found a reduction in or loss of some reproductive components. These effects could result in subtle shifts in conununity composition after several years of ozone exposure. 

There is a critical need to understand the interaction of multiple pollutants on individual plant species and ecosystems. Multiple-pollutant effects are generally important, but little is known of their effects on most plants. Variable concentrations, ratios of pollutants, and age of plants all affect response. 

The observed Brix (and acidity) of a given freshly pressed juice will vary over a limited range depending on a number of plant variables such as seasonality, variety and location. However, concentrated juices are produced to an industry standard and so there will be slight variations in the degree of concentration required to achieve the standard of concentrated juice. 

Most chalcophile elements (i.e, S and other elements with an affinity for S in nature such as Cu, As, Se, Cd, In, and W), boron, and the halogens are enriched in coal with respect to soil, and this accounts in part for their enrichment in emitted particles. Differences between eastern and western coals are apparent for many elements, especially the alkali and alkaline earth metals, As, and In. This accounts for some of the large plant-to-plant variability that we observe below. 

In order to avoid the difficulties of naturally occurring variations in study conditions, Fall et al. (1988) studied the emission of sulfur gases from several plant/soil systems using a flux chamber. The study was designed so that emissions from soil could be separated from emissions from plants. Variable amounts of carbon disulfide were emitted from wheat. The effects of light and temperature were observed. Further work was proposed so that systematic investigation could accurately measure the contributions of a number of sulfur compounds under varying conditions. 

The controller is intended to keep the plant variable, 6p, at or near to the setpoint value, G,. The plant variable passes through a measurement system, which produces the value G , which is fed back in a negative sense to give the error, e ... 

The well-known deficiency of the proportional controller is that an error is necessary for the controller to sustain a non-zero output. Accordingly the plant variable, Bp, will always be offset by a certain amount from the setpoint, 0,. The proportional plus integral (P-fl) controller avoids this problem by adding in an integral term that will build up as long as an error remains. Figure 22.2 shows the arrangement. 

Another way of expressing the idea of model distortion is to regard the recorded plant transients as continuous, indirect measurements of the model s constant parameters. If these new, inferential measurements of the model parameters fall outside the ranges set by previous, more direct measurements then there is an inconsistency. We should reject the model in its current state and seek to improve it. By this formulation, it becomes clear that the model distortion approach consists of mapping the complex dynamic behaviour of recorded plant variables onto the simple... 

For simplicity, let us suppose that some of the n slates, X, correspond to available plant measurements. Assuming we have k measured plant variables, we find the corresponding k model variables as a subset of the states, x. Let y be a it-dimensional vector of corresponding model variables, given by... 

In many simulation studies there is one plant variable that is overridingly important and which is available from a test recording, in which case applying the procedure indicated above just once will provide the necessary test of explainability. In some cases, however, there will be several recorded plant variables of interest, when it becomes necessary to repeat the procedure. Noting that a new set of optimal parameters is needed to minimize the mismatch for each recorded variable, it is necessary to carry out the parameter-optimization procedure k times, once for each measured output. We may then carry out the first test for explainability k times ... 

System and plant variables affecting scale formation... 

It appears that the search for improved catalysts, the characterization of established catalysts, or the modification of major plant variables, all for large-scale applications, involve kinetic testing methods in a cyclic, self-consistent procedure which is best described by its relation to fundamental testing. This method does not necessarily produce the best of all possible catalyst converter systems but it does uncover those which suit the economic objective. 

Chernobyl fallout crosses, Cs derived from the global fallout black triangles, The values for K are fitted best with an exponential model (dashed line), (b) Normalized isotropic variograms and best fitted model for plant variables. Open squares, Cs open triangles, The values for radiocesium are fitted with a spherical model (dashed line), the one for with an exponential model (solid line). 

Table 2. According to the Kolmogorov-Smimov test (0.05 level). Best fit model variograms and fitted parameters for different soil and plant variables...

Capacities and costs are modeled for both plants and production lines within the plants. Production line variable investment and operating costs are linear functions of the number of subassemblies produced on those lines. Plant variable investment and operating costs are linear functions of the size of production lines (expressed as space requirements in square feet) installed in the plants. 

CFR 50, Appendix B (Criterion XIV) with respect to the bypass or inoperable status of safety systems, and Regulatory Guide 1.97 (Reference 4) which defines an acceptable method for implementing NRC requirements to provide instrumentation and to monitor plant variables and systems during and following an accident. 

The acceptance criterion for the resolution of GSI II.F.3 is that there shall be instrumentation of sufficient quantity, range, availability and reliability to permit adequate monitoring of plant variables and systems during and following an accident. 

The first design decision should be to apportion the requirements for the computer based system between the computer system (eomputer system requirements) and eonventional electrical and electronic equipment for measuring plant variables... 

In the past, most control rooms consisted of hard-wired equipment laid out on large metal panels and desks, which required the operator to patrol the panels, monitoring key plant variables, adjusting set-points and operating equipment. These have now commonly been replaced by computer screen based ( soft-desk ) systems, through which the operator both views the plant and operates it. In the majority of such cases fhere is no hard-wired facility at all. This is known as a human-computer interface (HCI) (or human-sysfem inferface (HSI)). 

The turbine trip fault is analysed using LOFTRAN. LOFTRAN computes pertinent plant variables, including the nuclear power transient, the flow coast-down, the primary system pressure transient, and the primary coolant temperature transient. FACTRAN code is then used to calculate the heat flux based on the LOFTRAN analysis results for nuclear power and flow. Finally, VIPRE-01 is used to calculate the DNBR during the transient, using the heat flux from FACTRAN and the flow Ifom LOFTRAN. 

Technical Specifications are specifications regarding the characteristics of nuclear power plants (variables. 

Sufficient instrumentation and control equipment shall be available, preferably at a single location (supplementary control room) that is physically and electrically separate from the control room, so that the reactor can be placed and maintained in a shut down state, residual heat can be removed, and the essential plant variables can be monitored should there be a loss of ability to perform these essential safety fimctions in the control room. 

---