Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Photoelectron event

In addition to the removal of one core electron by the incident X-rays (photoelectron process), the Auger process is taking place approximately 10 seconds after the photoelectron event. In this process an outer electron falls into the inner orbital vacancy from the photoelectron process and a second electron is emitted... [Pg.305]

The relative values of absorption and transmission of adjacent elemental ray paths in an x-ray beam provide the contrast in a projected image. The associated interaction of the x-rays with the material body can be defined in terms of collision cross sections that describe the probability of particular events occurring along the ray path. Here, the principal effects, for x-ray energies below 1 MeV, are identified in Sec. 26.2 as the photoelectron event and the Compton scattering event. These effects are combined to define a linear attenuation coefficient pj(x) that describes the variation of photon intensity along the ray path x according to the exponential relation = o... [Pg.653]

Intrinsic phototube noise, or dark current, arises from spontaneous ejection of electrons from the photocathode surface due to thermal fluctuations. Rates range om one hundred to several thousand single photoelectron events per second per phototube. Because of the weak signal and absence of any time coincidence dark current can be a significant background to the antineutrino pulse in undoped H2O detectors. Here we show that existing phototubes are quiet enough to allow for the use of modules of the size prescribed above. [Pg.35]

This distribution is illustrated in Fig. 3, for n = 2 and n = 20, which shows the evolution to a Gaussian distribution for large samples. For so-called photon-counting systems, where individual photoelectron events can be observed, such as in a photomultiplier, this random distribution may be observed directly in the presence of a constant optical power. In the more usual case, where the photoelectron production rate is much greater than the system... [Pg.216]

Tools from Mathematical Statistics Statistical Description of Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. Point Processes. - Theory The Optical Field A Stochastic Vector Field or. Classical Theoiy of Optical Coherence. Photoelectron Events A Doubly Stochastic Poisson Process or Theory of Photoelectron Statistics. - Applications Applications to Optical Communication. Applications to Spectroscopy. [Pg.696]

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (xps) and Auger electron spectroscopy (aes) are related techniques (19) that are initiated with the same fundamental event, the stimulated ejection of an electron from a surface. The fundamental aspects of these techniques will be discussed separately, but since the instmmental needs required to perform such methods are similar, xps and aes instmmentation will be discussed together. [Pg.274]

The above treatment is predicated on the assumption that the kinetic energies of the photoelectrons from atoms A and B are close in energy. In the event that this assumption does not hold, then all of the instmmental parameters do not cancel for these equations, and the situation is more complex. An alternative strategy in this case is to compare the spectmm of the unknown matedal with a spectmm acquired under identical conditions of a pure standard reference matedal containing A and B that is close in suspected composition to the unknown. In this case. [Pg.279]

During the photoelectron emission event there are electronic relaxation effects occurring, which are usually divided into intra- and inter-molecular relaxation effects. These effects can be rationalized in a classical picture as follows. An elec-... [Pg.72]

How then, can one recover some quantity that scales with the local charge on the metal atoms if their valence electrons are inherently delocalized Beyond the asymmetric lineshape of the metal 2p3/2 peak, there is also a distinct satellite structure seen in the spectra for CoP and elemental Co. From reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy (REELS), we have determined that this satellite structure originates from plasmon loss events (instead of a two-core-hole final state effect as previously thought [67,68]) in which exiting photoelectrons lose some of their energy to valence electrons of atoms near the surface of the solid [58]. The intensity of these satellite peaks (relative to the main peak) is weaker in CoP than in elemental Co. This implies that the Co atoms have fewer valence electrons in CoP than in elemental Co, that is, they are definitely cationic, notwithstanding the lack of a BE shift. For the other compounds in the MP (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) series, the satellite structure is probably too weak to be observed, but solid solutions Coi -xMxl> and CoAs i yPv do show this feature (vide infra) [60,61]. [Pg.116]

We start with an atom containing N electrons, with a total energy E in the initial state, denoted with the superscript i. The atom absorbs a photon of energy hv, the absorption event taking less than 10 17 s. Some 10 14 s later, the atom has emitted the photoelectron with kinetic energy Ek and is itself in the final state with one electron less and a hole in one of the core levels. The energy balance of the event is... [Pg.60]

We have tacitly assumed that the photoemission event occurs sufficiently slowly to ensure that the escaping electron feels the relaxation of the core-ionized atom. This is what we call the adiabatic limit. All relaxation effects on the energetic ground state of the core-ionized atom are accounted for in the kinetic energy of the photoelectron (but not the decay via Auger or fluorescence processes to a ground state ion, which occurs on a slower time scale). At the other extreme, the sudden limit , the photoelectron is emitted immediately after the absorption of the photon before the core-ionized atom relaxes. This is often accompanied by shake-up, shake-off and plasmon loss processes, which give additional peaks in the spectrum. [Pg.62]

Fig. 1. X-ray absorption spectrum (XAS) of Cu—Zn metallothionein at the Cu and Zn K-edges. The structure near the edge, referred to as XANES is dominated by multiple scattering events while the extended structure, referred to as EXAFS, at photoelectron energies greater than 30-50 eV is primarily due to single scattering events... Fig. 1. X-ray absorption spectrum (XAS) of Cu—Zn metallothionein at the Cu and Zn K-edges. The structure near the edge, referred to as XANES is dominated by multiple scattering events while the extended structure, referred to as EXAFS, at photoelectron energies greater than 30-50 eV is primarily due to single scattering events...
Equation (3.1) also assumes that the photoelectron is scattered off only one neighbouring atom i.e. EXAFS results from only a single scattering event. This is true for most cases particularly at relatively high energi es (200 eV above the edge). However,... [Pg.80]

The surface sensitivity is ensured by detecting the decay products of the photoabsorption process instead of the direct optical response of the medium (transmission, reflection). In particular one can measure the photoelectrons, Au r electrons, secondary electrons, fluorescence photons, photodesorbed ions and neutrals which are ejected as a consequence of the relaxation of the system after the photoionization event. No matter which detection mode is chosen, the observable of the experiment is the interference processes of the primary photoelectron with the backscattered amplitude. [Pg.100]

The search for a neutrino burst from SN1987a was carried out on the data of Run 1892, which continuously covered the period from 16 09, 21 February to 07 31, 24 February in Japanese Standard Time, which is UT plus 9 hours. Events satisfying the following four criteria were selected 1) the total number of photoelectrons per event in the inner detector had to be less than 170, corresponding to a 50 MeV electron 2) the total number of photoelectrons in... [Pg.339]

The Poisson distribution can be applied also to describe the action of detectors. For example, suppose the interaction of a 7-ray photon with an inefficient scintillator produced, on average, 3.3 photoelectrons from the photocathode. The probability of producing no photoelectrons (not seeing the event) is given by the Poisson distribution as ... [Pg.570]


See other pages where Photoelectron event is mentioned: [Pg.225]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.1326]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.6]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.26 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info