Phase inversion temperature surfactant

Fig. XIV-10. The correlation between the HLB number and the phase inversion temperature in cyclohexane of nonionic surfactants. (From Ref. 71.)...

At low temperature, nonionic surfactants are water-soluble but at high temperatures the surfactant s solubUity in water is extremely smaU. At some intermediate temperature, the hydrophile—Hpophile balance (HLB) temperature (24) or the phase inversion temperature (PIT) (22), a third isotropic Hquid phase (25), appears between the oil and the water (Fig. 11). The emulsification is done at this temperature and the emulsifier is selected in the foUowing manner. Equal amounts of the oil and the aqueous phases with aU the components of the formulation pre-added are mixed with 4% of the emulsifiers to be tested in a series of samples. For the case of an o/w emulsion, the samples are left thermostated at 55°C to separate. The emulsifiers giving separation into three layers are then used for emulsification in order to find which one gives the most stable emulsion. 

Subsequent studies and applications with ether carboxylates have been published [73]. Phase inversion temperature measurements, which can be used to select surfactants for enhanced oil recovery, showed good results when the phase inversion temperature of the system was just below the reservoir temperature [184]. 

The phase inversion temperature (PIT) method is helpful when ethoxylated nonionic surfactants are used to obtain an oil-and-water emulsion. Heating the emulsion inverts it to a water-and-oil emulsion at a critical temperature. When the droplet size and interfacial tension reach a minimum, and upon cooling while stirring, it turns to a stable oil-and-water microemulsion form. " ... 

Ehase Inversion Temperatures It was possible to determine the Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT) for the system under study by reference to the conductivity/temperature profile obtained (Figure 2). Rapid declines were indicative of phase preference changes and mid-points were conveniently identified as the inversion point. The alkane series tended to yield PIT values within several degrees of each other but the estimation of the PIT for toluene occasionally proved difficult. Mole fraction mixing rules were employed to assist in the prediction of such PIT values. Toluene/decane blends were evaluated routinely for convenience, as shown in Figure 3. The construction of PIT/EACN profiles has yielded linear relationships, as did the mole fraction oil blends (Figures 4 and 5). The compilation and assessment of all experimental data enabled the significant parameters, attributable to such surfactant formulations, to be tabulated as in Table II. 

Phase Inversion Temperature The carboxymethylate surfactant sample available for test purposes exhibited excellent salinity tolerance, in fact too high for practical sea water flooding... 

The most frequent emulsiflcation using phase inversion is known as the PIT (Phase Inversion Temperature) method [81-83] and occurs through a temperature quench. This method is based on the phase behavior of nonionic surfactants and the correlation existing between the so-called surfactant spontaneous curvature and the type of emulsion obtained. 

The first kinetics measurements about coalescence were reported by Kabalnov and Weers in water-in-oil emulsions [40]. These authors measured the characteristic time at which the layer of free water formed at the bottom of the emulsions corresponded approximately to half of the volume of the dispersed phase. This time was assumed to be equal to t. By measuring r at different temperatures, the activation energy was deduced from an Arrhenius plot. Kabalnov and Weers were able to obtain the activation energy for a water-in-octane emulsion at 50%, stabilized by the nonionic surfactant C12E5 (pentaethylene glycol mono n-dodecyl ether), above the phase inversion temperature (PIT), and found a value of 47 kgTr, Tr being the room temperature. 

The property of interest to characterize a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants is its hydrophilic-lipophilic tendency, which has been expressed in many different ways through a variety of concepts such as the hydrophiUc-lipophilic balance (HLB), the phase inversion temperature (PIT), the cohesive energy ratio (CER), the surfactant affinity difference (SAD) or the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) [1], which were found to be more or less satisfactory depending on the case. In the next section, the quantification of the effects of the different compounds involved in the formulation of surfactant-oil-water systems will be discussed in details to extract the concept of characteristic parameter of the surfactant, as a way to quantify its hydrophilic-lipophilic property independently of the nature of the physicochemical environment. 

A considerable amount of experimental work has been carried out on the so-called gel emulsions of water/nonionic surfactant/oil systems [9-14, 80, 106, 107]. These form in either the water-rich or oil-rich regions of the ternary phase diagrams, depending on the surfactant and system temperature. The latter parameter is important as a result of the property of nonionic surfactants known as the HLB temperature, or phase inversion temperature (PIT). Below the PIT, nonionic surfactants are water-soluble (hydrophilic form o/w emulsions) whereas above the PIT they are oil-soluble (hydrophobic form w/o emulsions). The systems studied were all of very high phase volume fraction, and were stabilised by nonionic polyether surfactants. 

The temperature (or salinity) at which optimal temperature (or optimal salinity), because at that temperature (or salinity) the oil—water interfacial tension is a minimum, which is optimum for oil recovery. For historical reasons, the optimal temperature is also known as the HLB (hydrophilic—lipophilic balance) temperature (42,43) or phase inversion temperature (PIT) (44). For most systems, all three tensions are very low for Tlc < T < Tuc, and the tensions of the middle-phase microemulsion with the other two phases can be in the range 10 5—10 7 N/m. These values are about three orders of magnitude smaller than the interfacial tensions produced by nonmicroemulsion surfactant solutions near the critical micelle concentration. Indeed, it is this huge reduction of interfacial tension which makes micellar-polymer EOR and its SEAR counterpart physically possible. 

Later we discover another parameter, the phase inversion temperature(PIT), which helps us to predict the structure of emulsions stabilized by nonionic surfactants. The PIT concept is based on the idea that the type of an emulsion is determined by the preferred curvature of the surfactant film. For a modern introduction into the HLB and PIT concepts see Ref. [546],... 

K. Shinoda and H. Takeda, The effect of added salts in water on the hydrophile-lipophile balance of nonionic surfactants the effect of added salts on the phase inversion temperature of emulsions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 32 (1970) 642-646. 

Just as solubilities of emulsifying agents vary with temperature, so does the HLB, especially for the non-ionic surfactants. A surfactant may thus stabilize O/W emulsions at low temperature, but W/O emulsions at some higher temperature. The phase inversion temperature (PIT), at which the surfactant changes from stabilizing O/W to W/O emulsions, is discussed in Section 3.6.1. 

HLB scale) An empirical scale categorizing surfactants in terms of their tendencies to be mostly oil-soluble or water-soluble, hence their tendencies to promote W/O or O/W emulsions, respectively. See also Phase Inversion Temperature. 

The ultralow interfacial tension can be produced by using a combination of two surfactants, one predominantly water soluble (such as sodium dodecyl sulfate) and the other predominantly oil soluble (such as a medium-chain alcohol, e.g., pentanol or hexanol). In some cases, one surfactant may be sufficient to produce the microemulsion, e.g., Aerosol OT (dioctyl sulfosuccinate), which can produce a W/O microemulsions. Nonionic surfactants, such as alcohol ethoxylates, can also produce O/W microemulsions, within a narrow temperature range. As the temperature of the system increases, the interfacial tension decreases, reaching a very low value near the phase inversion temperature. At such temperatures, an O/W microemulsion may be produced. 

The interfacial tension y at the planar interface has a minimum near the temperature Indeed, at the latter temperature r is small, A/jt0 = 0 and because d ij w/d J and dfi /dT have opposite signs and s is also small (because T is small), dy/d I 0. The temperature T0 is provided by Eq. (25) and is independent of the concentration of surfactant. In other words, the two minima of Fig. 4 which correspond to the phase inversion temperatures of a macroemulsion (the curve with a positive minimum) and microemulsion (the curve with a negative minimum) are the same. When emulsions are generated from a microemulsion and its excess phase, the emulsion is of the same kind as the microemulsion, the phase inversion temperature is obviously located in the middle of the middle phase microemulsion range and the above conclusion remains valid. The above results explain the observation of Shinoda and Saito [6,7] that the phase inversion temperature (PIT) of emulsions can be provided by the ternary equilibrium phase diagram. 

Shinoda and Kuineda [8] highlighted the effect of temperature on the phase behavior of systems formulated with two surfactants and introduced the concept of the phase inversion temperature (PIT) or the so-called HLB temperature. They described the recommended formulation conditions to produce MEs with surfactant concentration of about 5-10% w/w being (a) the optimum HLB or PIT of a surfactant (b) the optimum mixing ratio of surfactants, that is, the HLB or PIT of the mixture and (c) the optimum temperature for a given nonionic surfactant. They concluded that (a) the closer the HLBs of the two surfactants, the larger the cosolubilization of the two immiscible phases (b) the larger the size of the solubilizer, the more efficient the solubilisation process and (c) mixtures of ionic and nonionic surfactants are more resistant to temperature changes than nonionic surfactants alone. 

Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT) Temperature at which the hydrophilic and oleophilic natures of a surfactant are in balance. As temperature is increased through the PIT, a surfactant will change from promoting one kind of emulsion, such as OAV, to another, such as WO. 

Microemulsions should be formed near or at the phase inversion temperature (PIT) or HLB temperature for a given nonionic surfactant, since the solubilization of oil (or water) in an aqueous (or nonaqueous) solution of nonionic surfactant shows a maximum at this temperature. 

The closer the phase inversion temperature (PIT) of two surfactants, the greater is the solubilization and therefore, the minimum amount of the nonionic surfactants is needed. 

Mixtures containing 1 wt% of the pure nonionic surfactant C,2E5 in water were contacted with pure n-hexadecane and n-tetradecane at various temperatures between 25 and 60°C using the vertical cell technique. Similar experiments were performed with C,2E4 and n-hexadecane between about 15 and 40°C. In both cases the temperature ranged from well below to well above the phase inversion temperature (PIT) of the system, i.e., the temperature where hydrophilic and lipophilic properties of the surfactant are balanced and a middle phase microemulsion forms (analogous to the optimal salinity for ionic surfactants mentioned above). The different intermediate phases that were seen at different temperatures and the occurrence of spontaneous emulsification in some but not all of the experiments could be understood in terms of known aspects of the phase behavior, e.g., published phase diagrams for the C12E 5-water-n-tetradecane system, and diffusion path theory. That is, plausible diffusion paths could be found that showed the observed intermediate phases and/or spontaneous emulsification for each temperature. 

---