Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase identity determination using

Figure 6.8 a shows the phase determination using a second heavy-atom derivative F h is the structure factor for the second heavy atom. The radius of the smaller circle is IF Hpl, the amplitude of F Hp for the second heavy-atom derivative. For this derivative, Fp = F Hp — F H. Construction as before shows that the phase angles of F and Fj are possible phases for this reflection. In Fig. 6.8 b, the circles from Figs. 6.7b and 6.8a are superimposed, showing that Fp is identical to F. This common solution to the two vector equations is Fp, the desired structure factor. The phase of this reflection is therefore the angle labeled a in the figure, the only phase compatible with data from both derivatives. [Pg.113]

A qualitative thin-layer chromatography method has been described by Kleef et al. [27] for the detection of rocuronium bromide and its metabolites in biological samples. This method was developed to confirm the identity of rocuronium bromide and its metabolites prior to their determination using HPLC coupled with fluorescence detection. In this method, the dried residue from the extraction process was dissolved in 0.05 ml of 0.01 M HC1. The stationary phase used was silicagel plates, that were developed in a mobile phase consisting of 2% solution of Nal in 2-propanol. The elution process was run for 4 h, and after the elution... [Pg.305]

Again, the primary phase particles of the required substance modifica tion (material precursors) are usually very small. When seeds of the synthe sized phase are used, these primary particles are identical in size to the seeds. In the homogeneous liquid solutions or gas mixtures, the size ofpri mary particles is determined by the nucleation processes. The small size of the primary phase particles can influence considerably the chemical poten tial of the phase to be formed. For example, in the case of spherical parti cles, the chemical potential is determined by equation (1.5). Hence, the equilibrium partial pressure, p, of the saturated vapor or concentration, c of the saturated solution of the substance—for example, of the synthe sized one component phase—is determined by the Kelvin Thomson equation... [Pg.281]

The method of isomorphous replacement is the primary method used to determine the relative phases of protein crystal structures. The phenomenon of isomorphism was first described by Mitscherlich in 1819. and is described in Chapter 2. Isomorphous crystals have, by definition, almost identical structures, but with one or more atoms replaced by chemically similar ones (with different X-ray scattering power). The method by which relative phases are determined for a pair of isomorphous crystals depends on a knowledge of the intensity differences between the data sets for the two isomorphous crystals and the location of the varied atom, a quantity that is available from an analysis of the Patterson map or difference map. [Pg.318]

Quantitative phase analysis is used to determine the concentration of various phases that are present in a mixture after the identity of every phase has been established. Overall, the task may be quite complicated since several critical requirements and conditions should be met in order to achieve satisfactory accuracy of the analysis. [Pg.384]

While the majority of attention in combinatorial syntheses has been on solid phase analysis, the use of traditional solution phase organic chemistry to form compound collections should not be disregarded. MS techniques are widely used for evaluation of mixtures produced by combinatorial chemistry (4). However, a potential problem with the MS methodology involves a situation when isomolecular weight compounds are present. The compounds can be stereoisomers, positional isomers or by chance identical molecular weight materials. In these cases, the identity of the substance as determined by MS can be ambiguous. [Pg.97]

Thus, melting points (even in the absence of a full melting point phase diagram) and X-ray powder diffraction patterns are useful criteria for assessing the results of such crystallizations if suitable single crystals are formed, the more elaborate (but far more informative in terms of structural detail) method of single-crystal structure determination provides more definitive confirmation and structural descriptions of phase identities. [Pg.66]

Precise control of the relative phase between pulses is cmcial to the success of many multi-pulse NMR experiments, and some correction to the phase of a soft pulse may be required to maintain these relationships when both hard and soft pulses are to be applied to the same nucleus. When soft pulses are used on the observe channel, the phase difference (which may arise because of the potentially different rf paths used for high- and low-power pulses) may be determined by direct inspection of two separate ID pulse-acquire spectra recorded with high- tmd low-power pulses but under otherwise identical conditions. Using only zero-order (frequency-independent) phase correction of each spectrum, the difference in the resulting phase constants (soft minus hard) represents the phase difference between the high- and low-power rf routes. Adding this as a constant offset to the soft pulse phase should yield spectra of phase identical to that of the hard-pulse spectmm when processed identically, and this correction can be used in all subsequent experiments, provided the soft-pulse power remains unchanged. [Pg.353]

Crystallographic studies are impeded by the fact that some rare earth minerals always occur in the metamict state, which is an amorphous state mainly caused by radiation damage to the crystal structure caused by radioactive decay of elements such as uranium and thorium. Crystallographic data and crystal structures of metamict minerals were therefore determined using samples recrystallized by annealing. In such cases, we must note that there is some doubt about the identity of the crystal structure of the recrystallized phase and the original structure of pre-metamict minerals. [Pg.255]

The isothermal method was used. At least 20 hours with agitation at 900 rpm was allowed for equilibration. The identity of the solid phase was determined microscopically and by the use of the Schreinemakers method. The solid and liquid phases were separated from each other by centrifuging at 1500-2000 rpm. Potassium was determined as KCIO, phosphorus as Mg2P207> and water by difference. [Pg.199]

Three papers on microsolvation have been published. The effect of microsolvation by 0,1,2, or 3 water molecules on the identity 5 2 reaction between r and CH3-I has been determined using IR photodissociation spectroscopy and theoretical calculations at the MP2/aug-cc VDZ level of theory. The activation energy changes from -1.0 to 6.0 to 15.8 to 27.0 kJ mol with respect to the reactants when 0, 1, 2, or 3 water molecules, respectively, are present. The results indicate that the reaction is exothermic in the gas phase but endothermic in solution. [Pg.339]

Particle Sphericity. The two-detector-pair arrangement has another useful feature, and that is to give information with regard to the curvature over a certain arc of the particle surface. If the curvature measured at two different locations on the surface (phase difference) is identical, the particle is said to be spherical. If the two local curvatures differ, d>i2 and i3 will point at diameter values differing by AD. Consequently, a measure of the deviation from sphericity is available, and if AD exceeds a certain limit set by the user, the particle is said to be invalid. The underlying equations of size determination using the PDA technique assume that the particle is spherical, and hence any deviation from this assumption will introduce errors in the absolute determination of the particle size. [Pg.232]

It should be noted that the concentration of anions of the supporting electrolyte in our model, assuming an oxidation reaction, is determined using the electroneutrality condition, so no condition needs to be specified specifically for these ions. The electrode surface boundary condition for the NP concentration is identical to Equation 8.27, meaning that aU particles reaching the surface of the electrode stick to it, thus leaving the solution phase. [Pg.280]


See other pages where Phase identity determination using is mentioned: [Pg.351]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.803]    [Pg.1023]    [Pg.1132]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.1222]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.890]    [Pg.204]   


SEARCH



Use phase

© 2024 chempedia.info