Pharmaceutical companies Subject

In many products it seems highly probable that there exists a narrow range of optimum moisture contents that should be maintained. More specifically, the effect of moisture on MCC-containing tablets has been the subject of an investigation that demonstrates the sensitivity of this important excipient to moisture content [10]. These researchers found that differences exist in both the cohesive nature and the moisture content to two commercial brands of MCC. A very useful report on the equilibrium moisture content of some 30 excipients has been compiled by a collaborative group of workers from several pharmaceutical companies and appears in the Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients [11,12],... 

To date, three pharmaceutical companies have entered clinical trials with PHD inhibitors for the treatment of anemia with the most advanced being FG-2216. In clinical studies, compound 2 (likely FG-2216) showed a dose- and time-dependent elevation of plasma erythropoietin after oral administration [66]. Healthy volunteers were orally administered various doses of compound 2 and serum erythropoietin (EPO) concentrations were measured at various times. Compound 2 increased serum EPO levels in a dose-dependent manner and, following administration of the 20 mg/kg dose, a 5-fold increase of EPO levels was observed after 12 h. In the same patent application, the effect of 2 on anemic predialysis patients with no previous rh-EPO exposure was also disclosed. Patients were treated with 2 three times/week for 4 weeks (no dose reported) and the hemoglobin levels were assessed on day 42. The patients who received treatment showed a mean increase in hemoglobin of 1.9 g/dL from baseline values, whereas subjects who received placebo showed a mean decrease of 0.35 g/dL from baseline levels. These data suggest for the first time that an oral PHD inhibitor could be effective for the treatment of anemia. 

Normally, the study subject is informed both verbally and in the ICF that certain other individuals besides the investigator site staff wiU view his or her medical records. In clinical studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies or institutions, the monitoring and quality assurance (QA) personnel from the sponsors and CROs, and inspectors from a regulatory agency wiU review the medical records of the study subject. 

Should a study subject suffer any deterioration in health or well-being caused by participation in a study, the sponsors of the clinical research must provide appropriate compensation without regard to the question of legal liability. A statement to that effect should be present in the protocol. Frequently, the insurance policy of the sponsor includes the pharmaceutical company, clinical investigators and the institution where the clinical study is being undertaken. 

In the United Kingdom, the information sheet provided to the consenting study subject in a clinical trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical company will usually contain a reference to the clinical trial compensation guidelines of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI). It is not included in the information sheet of noncommercial studies. Study subjects taking part in clinical trials are not usually paid, unless it is... 

---