Performance tests repellency

Testing of repellents intended for human use on human test subjects is the method of choice as it uses the repellent s end user in the testing process and can yield results relevant to actual conditions of use. The use of in vitro test methods or animal models may inadequately simulate the eonditions under which repellents for use on humans are expected to perform. Tests on human subjects are carried out on adult volunteers, who may be selected from among candidates exhibiting mild or no sensitivity to arthropod bites. Equal numbers of male and female test volunteers are preferred. 

OU-repeUent fabrics resist wetting by oUy Hquids and repel oilhorne stains. The level of performance of such fabrics is judged by AATCC Test Method 118. 

As in other areas of natural products chemistry, studies on insect chemical defenses comprise several different aspects first come the isolation and structure determination of the compound(s) responsible for the defensive activity. The next step is the total synthesis of the identified compounds, in order to confirm the proposed structure, usually deduced from spectroscopic data only, and to get enough material for biological testing. Biosynthetic studies to determine the origin of the active compound(s) (biosynthesis by the insect itself or sequestration from the diet with or without metabolization) are sometimes performed. In some cases, the biological activities of the isolated compounds (repellency, toxicity...) and their possible pharmacological activities are also evaluated. This chapter is divided into four sections treating those different topics. 

After eight years of exposure, an extensive examination was started in 1994 to evaluate the effectivity and durability of the water repellent treatments [4]. Macroscopic tests as water uptake measurements were carried out to determine the remaining effect of the protective organosilicon layer. Due to the fact that surface information from hydrophobic treatment of mineral surfaces is supplied by surface sensitive measuring techniques, TOF-SIMS and additional DRJFT-studies on treated and exposed material were performed. 

Rubbing between two solid surfaces is a common case that can occur in everyday use of liquid repellent materials. However, there are also occasions when surfaces could come into contact with sharper objects (e.g. knives, pens, forks, etc.) that induce much more severe damage. Driven by this problem, a few studies have been published where liquid repellent surfaces undergo blade tests, which are practically linear abrasion tests but instead of a flat abradant material the rubbing is performed by a sharp blade. 

Solid particle impact is a common test that is performed to evaluate the mechanical robustness of surface finishes. In this test, sand is typically used which is a mixture of micrometer-sized oxide particles with the silicon dioxide being the most dominant. This test can provide information whether a coating is suitable for use in outdoor applications where eventually it has to withstand harsh weather conditions and contamination/ degradation of the liquid repellent properties by embedded particles on the surface that can disrupt the surface chemistry by their presence or can cause partial destruction of the surface texture due to the impacts. It is also a common test in aerospace applications (e.g. for helicopters) where they... 

Another technique that has been used to evaluate the mechanical performance of liquid repellent surfaces is to apply normal force to the substrate. This technique involves a material that comes in contact with the tested surface, compresses it and then it is retracted. This way the maximum load that a surface can withstand can be estimated while at the same time maintaining the surface texture that is responsible for the liquid repellency. 

Liquid repellent surfaces have been evaluated in the literature with other types of mechanical durability tests. Such tests are designed to evaluate the performance of the tested surfaces for certain types of applications (e.g. the laundry test for textiles). These include laimdry test, ultrasonication, and... 

CarbonX Repel sheds molten metal, petrochemicals, and hot/flam-mable liquids and will not burn, melt or ignite. Repel is a lightweight blend of high-performance fibers combined with a proprietary compound that enables the fabric to shed hot liquids. Repel passes the ASTM F955 pour test. Carbon X, (404) 805-4197, www.carbonx.com. Circle 283... 

Contact urticaria comprises a wheal-and-flare response occurring on the application of chemicals to intact skin. Maibach and Johnson (39 ) report on a patient who developed contact urticaria after contact with an insect repellent. Open patch tests were performed with several commercial brands of insect repellents. Only diethyltoluamide produced a positive wheal-and-flare response within 20 minutes after application. A positive passive transfer suggested that this case was due to an immunological response (immediate hypersensitivity). 

With a satisfactory ANN model, structures can be devised and tested in the model to predict their repellent classes. This was performed with just over 2000 acylpiperidine structures. Some of these compounds were tested previously, but many others were novel in that they were not evaluated previously as mosquito repellents. From 2000 predicted compounds, 34 were selected for synthesis of them, 23 were novel compounds and 11 were chosen from those in the USDA archive. Selection of compounds tested previously allowed for comparison and validation of the current repellent testing methodology with that used decades ago. The repellency data generated for this study were more precise and linear, that is, the repellency was measured in days of protection, rather than put... 

---