Overbeek equations

A very similar equation was introduced by Katchalsky et al. (1954), in which an attempt is made to use the Hermans-Overbeek equation (Hermans and Overbeek, 1948) to compute the actual electrostatic free energy change that can be attributed to the accumulation of negative charge in a flexible linear poly electrolyte. This equation is of the general form ... 

Since for the vesicle is fixed whereas for the presynaptic membrane it is varied by increments AF, in (2) we introduce a rough symmetrization of the Verwey-Overbeek equation ... 

If only the y iax value is known then the Reerink-Overbeek equation can be used ... 

Here we consider the total interaction between two charged particles in suspension, surrounded by tlieir counterions and added electrolyte. This is tire celebrated DLVO tlieory, derived independently by Derjaguin and Landau and by Verwey and Overbeek [44]. By combining tlie van der Waals interaction (equation (02.6.4)) witli tlie repulsion due to the electric double layers (equation (C2.6.lOI), we obtain... 

Overbeek and Booth [284] have extended the Henry model to include the effects of double-layer distortion by the relaxation effect. Since the double-layer charge is opposite to the particle charge, the fluid in the layer tends to move in the direction opposite to the particle. This distorts the symmetry of the flow and concentration profiles around the particle. Diffusion and electrical conductance tend to restore this symmetry however, it takes time for this to occur. This is known as the relaxation effect. The relaxation effect is not significant for zeta-potentials of less than 25 mV i.e., the Overbeek and Booth equations reduce to the Henry equation for zeta-potentials less than 25 mV [284]. For an electrophoretic mobility of approximately 10 X 10 " cm A -sec, the corresponding zeta potential is 20 mV at 25°C. Mobilities of up to 20 X 10 " cmW-s, i.e., zeta-potentials of 40 mV, are not uncommon for proteins at temperatures of 20-30°C, and thus relaxation may be important for some proteins. 

In filtration, the particle-collector interaction is taken as the sum of the London-van der Waals and double layer interactions, i.e. the Deijagin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory. In most cases, the London-van der Waals force is attractive. The double layer interaction, on the other hand, may be repulsive or attractive depending on whether the surface of the particle and the collector bear like or opposite charges. The range and distance dependence is also different. The DLVO theory was later extended with contributions from the Born repulsion, hydration (structural) forces, hydrophobic interactions and steric hindrance originating from adsorbed macromolecules or polymers. Because no analytical solutions exist for the full convective diffusion equation, a number of approximations were devised (e.g., Smoluchowski-Levich approximation, and the surface force boundary layer approximation) to solve the equations in an approximate way, using analytical methods. 

If the electrostatic barrier is removed either by specific ion adsorption or by addition of electrolyte, the rate of coagulation (often followed by measuring changes in turbidity) can be described fairly well from simple diffusion-controlled kinetics and the assumption that all collisions lead to adhesion and particle growth. Overbeek (1952) has derived a simple equation to relate the rate of coagulation to the magnitude of the repulsive barrier. The equation is written in terms of the stability ratio ... 

Another interpretation of the electrocapillary curve is easily obtained from Equation (89). We wish to investigate the effect of changes in the concentration of the aqueous phase on the interfacial tension at constant applied potential. Several assumptions are made at this point to simplify the desired result. More comprehensive treatments of this subject may be consulted for additional details (e.g., Overbeek 1952). We assume that (a) the aqueous phase contains only 1 1 electrolyte, (b) the solution is sufficiently dilute to neglect activity coefficients, (c) the composition of the metallic phase (and therefore jt,Hg) is constant, (d) only the potential drop at the mercury-solution interface is affected by the composition of the solution, and (e) the Gibbs dividing surface can be located in such a way as to make the surface excess equal to zero for all uncharged components (T, = 0). With these assumptions, Equation (89) becomes... 

FIG. 12.4 The domain within which most investigations of aqueous colloidal systems lie in terms of particle radii and 1 1 electrolyte concentration. The diagonal lines indicate the limits of the Hiickel and the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equations. (Redrawn with permission from J. Th. G., Overbeek, Quantitative Interpretation of the Electrophoretic Velocity of Colloids. In Advances in Colloid Science, Vol. 3 (H. Mark and E. J. W. Verwey, Eds.), Wiley, New York, 1950.)... 

FIG. 12.8 Plot of rju/e versus f/0, that is, the zeta potential according to the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equation, Equation (39), versus the potential at the inner limit of the diffuse part of the double layer. Curves are drawn for various concentrations of 1 1 electrolyte with / = 10 15 V-2 m2. (Redrawn with permission from J. Lyklema and J. Th. G. Overbeek, J. Colloid Sci., 16, 501 (1961).)... 

Source J. Th. G. Overbeek, in Colloid Science, Vol. I (H. R. Kruyt, Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1952. theoretical values are given by Equation (10). 

Overbeek (11) were used. The integral over the spherical surface region corresponding to that for an infinite flat plate given in Equation 4 was done numerically using Simpsons rule and results in Equation 9a. 

It is convenient to redefine the pertinent variables in the terms used by Loeb, Wiersema, and Overbeek so that the available tabular quantities can be used directly as input to the computer. These terms are q0 = a, x = l/ r, and a0 = (ckT/47re)I(q0, u0). These substitutions give rise to Equation 9b. 

Equation 1.23 was derived by Overbeek and Wijga [52] and Overbeek [53] to describe EOF in a porous medium without boundaries and will be used in the next section to express the effect of the capillary wall on the flow distribution inside the column. 

Ruckenstein and Schiby derived4 an expression for the electrochemical potential, which accounted for the hydration of ions and their finite volume. The modified Poisson-Boltzmann equation thus obtained was used to calculate the force between charged surfaces immersed in an electrolyte. It was shown that at low separation distances and high surface charges, the modified equation predicts an additional repulsion in excess to the traditional double layer theory of Deijaguin—Landau—Verwey—Overbeek. 

Caution should be taken when calculating the doublelayer force between two parallel plates. It is clear that the force is not proportional to the excess concentration of ions at the middle distance (with respect to the concentration of ions at infinity), since this Langmuir equation involved the assumption of ions of negligible sizes. We will use instead the procedure introduced by Verwey and Overbeek,18 which is based on general thermodynamic principles, and does not imply the Boltzmann distribution of ions.19 The force, per unit area, between two parallel plates separated by a distance l is given by... 

The name, DLYO, originates from the first letter in the surname of the four authors (Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey and Overbeek) from two different groups, which originally published these ideas. The theory is based on the competition between two contributions, a repulsive electric double layer and an attractive van der Waals force [4,5]. The interaction in the electric double layer was originally obtained from mean field calculations via the Poisson-Boltzmann equation [Eq. (4)]. However, the interaction can also be determined by MC simulations (Sec. II. B) and by approximate integral equations like HNC (Sec. II. C). This chapter will focus on the first two possibilities. 

Because this result has been obtained by solving a generalized Poisson-Boltzmann equation with the linearization approximation, it is necessary to compare it with the DLVO theory in the limit where the Debye approximation holds. In this case, Verwey and Overbeek [2], working in cgs (centimeter-gram-second) units, derived the following approximate equation for the repulsive potential ... 

He refers to Equation 7.14 (Equation 2 in his paper) as the Nemst equation and states his approach explicitly as follows The only important point is that the Nemst equation should correctly be obeyed, if one is considering a constant surface potential problem. His criticism is clearly based on the idea that there exists a chemical potential difference A/ic between the two phases. Many colloid scientists think in this way, but few express it so elegantly. The idea resurfaces in Overbeek s criticism of SSS theory [17, 18]. 

In the absence of added electrolytes the reduced viscosity, Jjsp/C, of a polyelectrolyte rises upon dilution in a striking manner as a result of the expansion of the polymer chains (Fuoss and Strauss, 1948 Hermans and Overbeek, 1948 Kuhn et al., 1948). Empirically, Fuoss and Strauss have found that the viscosity data can be represented by the equations... 

The DLVO theory, which was developed independently by Derjaguin and Landau and by Verwey and Overbeek to analyze quantitatively the influence of electrostatic forces on the stability of lyophobic colloidal particles, has been adapted to describe the influence of similar forces on the flocculation and stability of simple model emulsions stabilized by ionic emulsifiers. The charge on the surface of emulsion droplets arises from ionization of the hydrophilic part of the adsorbed surfactant and gives rise to electrical double layers. Theoretical equations, which were originally developed to deal with monodispersed inorganic solids of diameters less than 1 pm, have to be extensively modified when applied to even the simplest of emulsions, because the adsorbed emulsifier is of finite thickness and droplets, unlike solids, can deform and coalesce. Washington has pointed out that in lipid emulsions, an additional repulsive force not considered by the theory due to the solvent at close distances is also important. 

Values of e, n and ve and Hamaker constants for two identical types of a material in a vacuum, which are calculated from Equation (567) by taking e3 = 1 and 3 = 1, are given in Table 7.1. Unfortunately, the lack of material constants, such as the dielectric constant, as a function of frequency for most of the substances, and also the complexity of the derived formulae have hampered the general use of the Lifshitz model. However, Lifshitz theory made possible the advent of the first theories on the stability of hydrophobic colloids as a balance between London attraction and electrical double-layer repulsion. Later, these theories were further elaborated by Derjaguin and Landau, and independently by Verwey and Overbeek. The general theory of colloidal stability (which is beyond the scope of this book) is based on Lifshitz theory and has become known as the DLVO theory, by combining the initials of these four authors. 

The electrostatic retardation of the adsorption kinetics of ionic siufactants is one of these nonequilibrium surface phenomena to be described on the basis of this physical model, consisting of the electrochemical macro-kinetic equations used in theoretical and colloid electrochemistry. This approach describes the flux of ions in terms of their spatial distribution. The equations were first developed by Overbeek (1943) and later proved to be valid for the theory of different... 

---