Double layer charging

As the electrode surface will, in general, be electrically charged, there will be a surplus of ionic charge with opposite sign in the electrolyte phase in a layer of a certain thickness. The distribution of jons in the electrical double layer so formed is usually described by the Gouy— Chapman—Stern theory [20], which essentially considers the electrostatic interaction between the smeared-out charge on the surface and the positive and negative ions (non-specific adsorption). An extension to this theory is necessary when ions have a more specific interaction with the electrode, i.e. when there is specific adsorption of ions. 

In any event, there is always a strict, equilibrium relation between the charge density, qM, on the electrode sur ce and the total potential difference, E, between the bulk phases of electrode and solution. This relation is often characterized by the differential double-layer capacity, Cd, defined as 

in an electrochemical experiment, the potential changes, it is obvious that the charge density will also change and this requires a charging current to flow according to 

---

Here, the only surface adsorption is taken to be that of the charge balancing the double-layer charge, and the electrochemical potential change is equated to a change in o- Integration then gives... 

The great advantage of the RDE over other teclmiques, such as cyclic voltannnetry or potential-step, is the possibility of varying the rate of mass transport to the electrode surface over a large range and in a controlled way, without the need for rapid changes in electrode potential, which lead to double-layer charging current contributions. 

The background (residual) current that flows in the absence of the electroactive species of interest is composed of contributions due to double-layer charging process and redox reactions of impurities, as well as of the solvent, electrolyte, or electrode. 

The simplest, and by far the most common, detection scheme is the measurement of the current at a constant potential. Such fixed-potential amperometric measurements have the advantage of being free of double-layer charging and surface-transient effects. As a result, extremely low detection limits—on the order of 1-100 pg (about 10 14 moles of analyte)—can be achieved, hi various situations, however, it may be desirable to change the potential during the detection (scan, pulse, etc.). 

Figure 39. Current-time variation in nickel pitting dissolution in NaCl solution.89,91 1, double-layer charging current 2, fluctuation-diffusion current 3, minimum dissolution current 4, pit-growth current (Reprinted from M. Asanuma andR. Aogaki, Nonequilibrium fluctuation theory on pitting dissolution. II. Determination of surface coverage of nickel passive film, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9938, 1997, Fig. 2. Copyright 1997, American Institute of Physics.)...

The presence of a Faradaic electrode reaction of any kind competing with the double layer charging presents a problem in determining the purely capacitive current needed to calculate the surface charge. From a plot of 1 vs. (/ = total electrode current) with a fixed concentration of the ions of the electrode metal dissolved in solution, the surface charge can be obtained [65Butl]. (Data obtained with this method are labelled TC). 

Overbeek and Booth [284] have extended the Henry model to include the effects of double-layer distortion by the relaxation effect. Since the double-layer charge is opposite to the particle charge, the fluid in the layer tends to move in the direction opposite to the particle. This distorts the symmetry of the flow and concentration profiles around the particle. Diffusion and electrical conductance tend to restore this symmetry however, it takes time for this to occur. This is known as the relaxation effect. The relaxation effect is not significant for zeta-potentials of less than 25 mV i.e., the Overbeek and Booth equations reduce to the Henry equation for zeta-potentials less than 25 mV [284]. For an electrophoretic mobility of approximately 10 X 10 " cm A -sec, the corresponding zeta potential is 20 mV at 25°C. Mobilities of up to 20 X 10 " cmW-s, i.e., zeta-potentials of 40 mV, are not uncommon for proteins at temperatures of 20-30°C, and thus relaxation may be important for some proteins. 

In order to distinguish more clearly between effects induced by the varying potential and kinetic contributions, the continuous oxidation of the three Cj molecules was followed at a constant potential after the potential step. The corresponding faradaic and mass spectrometric (m/z = 44) current transients recorded after 3 minutes adsorption at 0.16 V and a subsequent potential step to 0.6 V (see Section 13.2) are reproduced in Figs. 13.5-13.7. In all cases, the faradaic current exhibits a small initial spike, which is associated with double-layer charging when stepping the electrode potential to 0.6 V. 

The tip current depends on the rate of the interfacial IT reaction, which can be extracted from the tip current vs. distance curves. One should notice that the interface between the top and the bottom layers is nonpolarizable, and the potential drop is determined by the ratio of concentrations of the common ion (i.e., M ) in two phases. Probing kinetics of IT at a nonpolarized ITIES under steady-state conditions should minimize resistive potential drop and double-layer charging effects, which greatly complicate vol-tammetric studies of IT kinetics. 

The XPS results obtained by Kolb and Hansen are reproduced in Fig. 6 and they clearly demonstrate not only that cations as well as anions stay on the surface but also that the amount of ions exhibits the expected potential dependence even in the case of specific adsorption. The preservation of the double layer charge after emersion was also shown by other techniques like charge monitoring [28] and electroreflectance measurements [29],... 

Solution-phase DPV of Au144-C6S dispersed in 10 mM [bis(triphenylpho-sphoranylidene)-ammoniumtetrakis-(pentafluorophenyl)-borate (BTPPATPFB)/ toluene] [acetonitrile] 2 1 revealed well-behaved, equally spaced and symmetric quantized double-layer charging peaks with AE - 0.270 0.010 V. Applying the classical concentric spheres capacitor model (8) reveals an individual cluster capacitance of 0.6 aF [334, 335]. 

Double-layer charging Charge separation occurs on a microscopic scale in a liquid at any interface (solid-liquid, gas-liquid, or liquid-liquid). As the liquid flows, it carries a charge and it leaves a charge of opposite sign on the other surface, for example, a pipe wall. 

A related technique is the current-step method The current is zero for t < 0, and then a constant current density j is applied for a certain time, and the transient of the overpotential 77(f) is recorded. The correction for the IRq drop is trivial, since I is constant, but the charging of the double layer takes longer than in the potential step method, and is never complete because 77 increases continuously. The superposition of the charge-transfer reaction and double-layer charging creates rather complex boundary conditions for the diffusion equation only for the case of a simple redox reaction and the range of small overpotentials 77 [Pg.177]

These equations cannot be used at higher overpotentials 77 > kT/e0. If the reaction is not too fast, a simple extrapolation by eye can be used. The potential transient then shows a steeply rising portion dominated by double-layer charging followed by a linear region where practically all the current is due to the reaction (see Fig. 13.2). Extrapolation of the linear part to t = 0 gives a good estimate for the corresponding overpotential. 

---