Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optimization system variables

Molten sodium is injected into the retort at a prescribed rate and the temperature of the system is controlled by adjusting the furnace power or with external cooling. The variables that control the quaUty and physical properties of the powder are the reduction temperature and its uniformity, diluent type and concentration, sodium feed rate, and stirring efficiency. Optimizing a variable for one powder attribute can adversely affect another property. For example, a high reduction temperature tends to favor improved chemical quaUty but lowers the surface area of the powder. [Pg.327]

Once the selectivity is optimized, a system optimization can be performed to Improve resolution or to minimize the separation time. Unlike selectivity optimization, system cqptimization is usually highly predictable, since only kinetic parameters are generally considered (see section 1.7). Typical experimental variables include column length, particle size, flow rate, instrument configuration, sample injection size, etc. Hany of these parameters can be. Interrelated mathematically and, therefore, computer simulation and e]q>ert systems have been successful in providing a structured approach to this problem (480,482,491-493). [Pg.746]

As a second step of the algorithm of symmetry reduction formulated above, we have to describe the optimal system of subalgebras of the algebra c(l, 3) of the rank 5 = 3. Indeed, the initial system has p = 4 independent variables. It has to be reduced to a system of differential equations in 4 — s = 1 independent variables, so that 5 = 3. [Pg.283]

Optimization of System Variables. All optimization efforts were carried out in the flow injection mode, as stated in the experimental section. [Pg.386]

Optimization of System Variables. The dependence of the blank level and the total signal (blank + analyte response) on the liquid flow rate is shown in Figure 10. The conditions are the same as those for Figure 9 except that 10"6 M Hg2(N03)2 at pH 4 is used. Down to the lowest flow rate studied (1500 / L/min), the net response to 5 ppbv S02 is essentially constant. Unfortunately, this flow rate dependence was examined fairly late in the study and the other data reported here were obtained with a liquid flow rate of 2600 pL/min. It is clear, however, that down to at least 1500 nL/min, the response/blank ratio improves it may be advantageous to use a lower flow rate. This behavior also strongly suggests that the transport of mercury from the bulk solution (liberated due to the intrinsic disproprotionation equilibrium) to the carrier air stream is controlled by liquid phase mass transfer. [Pg.393]

The primary intent of this work is to design, build and verify a system capable of accurately varying important system variables that are normally strictly monitored and controlled by the commercial electrolyzers containing the same PEME stack. The goal of the experimental characterization of the stack, under varying conditions and power, is to enable an optimized interconnection between the stack and RE source. Such a coupled system specifically designed with the RE source in mind would reduce the overall cost of independent stand alone systems and may eliminate the need for electrical storage components. [Pg.62]

Once an expression system is chosen, it is beneficial to optimize the variables of the system to maximize production. If a bacterial system is snfficient, a choice has to be made between vectors for intracellnlar production and secretion. This choice is made on considerations of downstream pnrification and generation of bioactivity. Intracellular expression resnlts in high yields, but often leads to the protein s aggregation into inclnsion bodies (Georgiou and Bowden, 1991 Papontsakis, 1991). [Pg.82]

The mobile-phase velocity is set by the system variables and cannot be independently optimized unless forced flow development conditions are used. [Pg.578]

Nuclear power reactors inherently have some highly nonlinear characteristics, which means that whatever objective function (there are several possibilities) and constraints are used to define and quantify acceptable LPs, some of these system variables will inevitably be nonlinear functions of the problem s control (decision) variables. Examples of such nonlinearities include the effects of local thermal and hydraulic feedback and the time dependence that results from radiation exposure (an accumulated history effect). Particularly with respect to the latter, the computational expense associated with analyzing a single LP solution can be substantial. When considered within the context of of tens of thousands of solutions, as is often required for the use of modem optimization routines, the CPU run time cost becomes prohibitively expensive. [Pg.206]

Once the RTO system has calculated the optimal operating variables for the plant or system, these... [Pg.2592]

Reactor control concerns the system properties from the control viewpoint, and the determination of criteria of control and optimization. System properties include dynamic properties such as the nature of system response to small and large disturbances. Regular transient reactor operation may be of future importance even for some product formation processes (43). Elucidation of input operating variables affecting a process is then valuable for reactor control. In this connection the parametric... [Pg.369]

Industrial engineers frequently use simulation experiments to compare the performance of alternative systems and, ideally, to optimize system performance. When a system is modeled as a stochastic process, the objective is often to optimize expected performance, where expected means the mathematical expectation of a random variable. This section describes methods for optimization via simulation, using the problem of selecting the inventory policy that minimizes long-run expected cost per period as an illustration. [Pg.2487]

To optimize this approach the boundaries of the engineering system are necessary in order to apply the mathematical results and numerical techniques of the optimization theory to engineering problems. For purposes of analysis, they serve to isolate the system from its surroundings, because all interactions between the system and its surroundings are assumed fixed/frozen at selected, representative levels. However, since interactions and comphcations always exist, the act of defining the system boundaries is required in the process of approximating the real system. It also requires defining the quantitative criterion on the basis of which candidates will be ranked to determine the best approach. Included will be the selection system variables that will be used to characterize or identify candidates, and to define a model that will express the manner in which the variables are related. [Pg.636]

It is not easy to identify the sequence of variable groupings that minimizes the number of calls to the nonlinear system. Ciutk, Powell, and Reid (1974) proposed a heuristic algorithm that is often optimal. It is easy to describe We start with the first variable and identify the functions that depend on it Next we check if the second variable does not interfere with the functions with which the first variable interacts. If so, we go on with the third variable. Any new variable introduced into the sequence ako increments the number of functions involved. When no additional variables can be added to the list, thk means that the first group has been identified and we can go on with the next group until all the N variables of the system have been collected. Clearly, the matrix structure of the Jacobian must be known for this procedure to be applied. Thk means that the user must identify the Boolean of the Jacobian, that k, the matrix that contains the dependencies of each function from the system variables (see Figure 2.11). [Pg.116]


See other pages where Optimization system variables is mentioned: [Pg.175]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.2558]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.197]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.389 ]




SEARCH



System optimization

© 2024 chempedia.info