Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

One-particle solution

The remedy is not to attempt the reduction of chemistry to the one-particle solutions of quantum physics, without taking the emergent properties of chemical systems into account. Chemical reactions occur in crowded environments where the presence of matter in molar quantities is not without effect on the behaviour of the quantum objects that mediate the interactions. It is only against this background that quantum theory can begin to make a useful contribution to the understanding of chemical systems. [Pg.276]

If an approximate separation is not possible, the many-body problem can often be transformed into a pseudo one-particle system by taking the average interaction into account. For quantum mechanics, this corresponds to the Hartree-Fock approximation, where the average electron-electron repulsion is incorporated. Such pseudo one-particle solutions often form the conceptual understanding of the system, and provide the basis for more refined computational methods. [Pg.9]

Construct the operator for the z component of the angular momentum of one particle. Solution... [Pg.689]

Comparing the Eqs. 28.78 and 28.79, we can see that they are different in two details. Our derivation contains the normal product of the creation and annihilation operators therefore it is the two-particle correction to the one-particle solution represented by selfconsistent polarons (28.76). Frdhlich Hamiltonian does not contain the normal product it refers directly to electron corrections. But this detail is not important. [Pg.535]

We conclude this section by discussing an expression for the excess chemical potential in temrs of the pair correlation fimction and a parameter X, which couples the interactions of one particle with the rest. The idea of a coupling parameter was mtrodiiced by Onsager [20] and Kirkwood [Hj. The choice of X depends on the system considered. In an electrolyte solution it could be the charge, but in general it is some variable that characterizes the pair potential. The potential energy of the system... [Pg.473]

Chapman-Enskog Expansion As we have seen above, the momentum flux density tensor depends on the one-particle distribution function /g, which is itself a solution of the discrete Boltzman s equation (9.80). As in the continuous case, finding the full solution is in general an intractable problem. Nonetheless, we can still obtain a useful approximation through a perturbative Chapman-Enskog expansion. [Pg.497]

The problem of finding the best approximation of this type and the best one-electron set y2t. . ., y>N is handled in the Hartree-Fock scheme. Of course, a total wave function of the same type as Eq. 11.38 can never be an exact solution to the Schrodinger equation, and the error depends on the fact that the two-electron operator (Eq. 11.39) cannot be exactly replaced by a sum of one-particle operators. Physically we have neglected the effect of the "Coulomb hole" around each electron, but the results in Section II.C(2) show that the main error is connected with the neglect of the Coulomb correlation between electrons with opposite spins. [Pg.224]

It is a characteristic feature of all these relativistic equations that in addition to positive energy solutions, they admit of negative energy solutions. The clarification of the problems connected with the interpretation of these negative energy solutions led to the realization that in the presence of interaction, a one particle interpretation of these equations is difficult and that in a consistent quantum mechanical formulation of the dynamics of relativistic systems it is convenient to deal from the start with an indefinite number of particles. In technical language this is the statement that one is to deal with quantized fields. [Pg.485]

We can speak of h as the hamiltonian for the one-particle case, and avail ourselves of the familiar methods to study the solutions of Eq. (10-318). For a central electrostatic field h takes the form... [Pg.630]

Experimentally derived potential energy curves are shown in Figures 10 and 11. (Note that only one particle size is illustrated, namely, 10 pm.) The shape of these potential energy curves as a function of ionic strength, solution pH, particle and surface composition, etc. may be used to explain the effect of some of these variables on particle capture and... [Pg.552]

As stated above, Afd is related to the contact pair potential Afg(0). In a floe, each particle is in close contact with z other particles. If A/a is small, the z lens-shaped overlap volumes (see Figure A) surrounding each particle do not overlap with each other, and Afd equals zAf (0)/2 where Afg(0) is given by Equation 8. For higher values of A/a, the lenses overlap partly, and Afd < zAfs(0)/2. Above a certain value of A/a (which depends on the packing of the particles in the floe), there is no polymer left within the interstices of the floe and all the solvent in the floe is within a distance A from the surface of at least one particle. Then the volume of solvent which is transferred towards the solution when a particle is added to the floe is readily calculated. [Pg.252]

This one-particle equation is sufficiently simple so that it is possible to obtain numerical solutions to any degree of accuracy. As first done by Burrau [84] the equation is transformed (eqn. 1.12) into confocal elliptic coordinates... [Pg.364]

Leaving the details, the equation describing the motion of one particle in two electrostatic waves allows perturbation methods to be applied in its study. There are three main types of behavior in the phase space - a limit cycle, formation of a non-trivial bounded attracting set and escape to infinity of the solutions. One of the goals is to determine the basins of attraction and to present a relevant bifurcation diagram for the transitions between different types of motion. [Pg.110]

This equation can be interpreted as the drift term of a collisionless Boltzmann equation for the one-particle Wigner distribution p(q,p). To see that, let us explore the physical meaning of p(q,p) in this context. First note that p(q, p ) is in principle a Lorentz scalar. Thus an invariant solution of Eq. (59) is... [Pg.209]

As a simple example of a QM/MM Car-Parinello study, we present here results from a mixed simulation of the zwitterionic form of Gly-Ala dipeptide in aqueous solution [12]. In this case, the dipeptide itself was described at the DFT (BLYP [88, 89 a]) level in a classical solvent of SPC water molecules [89b]. The quantum solute was placed in a periodically repeated simple cubic box of edge 21 au and the one-particle wavefunctions were expanded in plane waves up to a kinetic energy cutoff of 70 Ry. After initial equilibration, a simulation at 300 K was performed for 10 ps. [Pg.20]

In Bohmian mechanics, the way the full problem is tackled in order to obtain operational formulas can determine dramatically the final solution due to the context-dependence of this theory. More specifically, developing a Bohmian description within the many-body framework and then focusing on a particle is not equivalent to directly starting from the reduced density matrix or from the one-particle TD-DFT equation. Being well aware of the severe computational problems coming from the first and second approaches, we are still tempted to claim that those are the most natural ways to deal with a many-body problem in a Bohmian context. [Pg.117]

One such systematic generalization was obtained by Cohen,8 whose method is now given the point of departure was the expansion in clusters of the non-equilibrium distribution functions. This procedure is formally analogous to the series expansion in the activity where the integrals of the Ursell cluster functions at equilibrium appear in the coefficients. Cohen then obtained two expressions in which the distribution functions of one and two particles are given in terms of the solution of the Liouville equation for one particle. The elimination of this quantity between these two expressions is a problem which presents a very full formal analogy with the elimination (at equilibrium) of the activity between the Mayer equation for the concentration and the series... [Pg.321]


See other pages where One-particle solution is mentioned: [Pg.615]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.280]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.276 ]




SEARCH



One particle

Particle solution

Solute particles

Water with One Simple Solute Particle

© 2024 chempedia.info