Oil in gas droplet size

The separation efficiency of oil in gas depends upon the separation requirements of the oil droplets. Under gravity separation, it is not easy to separate small droplets from the gas phase. Many vendors claim that they can remove all the particles down to 10 pm. This is not commercially viable using an entrainment-type separator. In the oil and gas industry, most separators are sized to remove liquid droplets larger than 150 pm. Smaller droplets normally coalesce to form larger droplets (in the range of 150 pm) before they can be separated. 

---

Oil in gas droplet size Oil in water droplet size Water in oil droplet size Slug volume (water slug) Inlet nozzle momentum Momentum (gas outlet) Liquid outlet velocity Operating pressure... 

One noteworthy point is the selection of the droplet size. The oil-in-gas droplet was assmned as 200 pm. If this is reduced to 100 pm, the following warning will appear ... 

Retention time. A certain amount of oil storage is required in the vessel to assure that oil reaches equilibrium and flashed gas is liberated. Additional storage is required to assure that free water has time to coalesce into droplet sizes sufficient to fall in accordance with Eq. 1. It is common to use retention times from 3 to 30 min depending on laboratory or field data. If this information is not available, an oil retention time of 10 min is suggested for design. 

The absorption of ozone from the gas occurred simultaneously with the reaction of the PAH inside the oil droplets. In order to prove that the mass transfer rates of ozone were not limiting in this case, the mass transfer gas/water was optimized and the influence of the mass transfer water/oil was studied by ozonating various oil/water-emulsions with defined oil droplet size distributions. No influence of the mean droplet diameter (1.2 15 pm) on the reaction rate of PAH was observed, consequently the chemical reaction was not controlled by mass transfer at the water/oil interface or diffusion inside the oil droplets. Therefore, a microkinetic description was possible by a first order reaction with regard to the PAH concentration (Kornmuller et al., 1997 a). The effects of pH variation and addition of scavengers indicated a selective direct reaction mechanism of PAH inside the oil droplets... 

Gas bubble in oil phase. Little research here has been accomplished, and very little has been published about gas bubble or foam separation from liquid. Herein I offer a good contribution to this technology, along with a plea for more field-proven data. As in the case for liquid droplet fall in the gas phase, I propose that the same equations, Eqs. (4.5), (4.6), and (4.7), be used in the oil media. This is done in these three equations, Eq. (4.7) deriving the gas bubble terminal velocity. We must, however, input a feasible and proven gas particle size Du, pm. Having accomplished several field-proven foam separation tests, the following Dm determination equation is offered. 

Emulsion flotation is analogous to carrier flotation. Here, small-sized particles become attached to the surfaces of oil droplets (the carrier droplets). The carrier droplets attach to the air bubbles and the combined aggregates of small desired particles, carrier droplets, and air bubbles float to form the froth. An example is the emulsion flotation of submicrometre-sized diamond particles with isooctane. Emulsion flotation has also been applied to the flotation of minerals that are not readily wetted by water, such as graphite, sulfur, molybdenite, and coal [623]. Some oils used in emulsion flotation include mixed cresols (cresylic acid), pine oil, aliphatic alcohols, kerosene, fuel oil, and gas oil [623], A related use of a second, immiscible liquid to aid in particle separation is in agglomeration flocculation (see Section 5.6.4). 

In the preceding equations, the subscript g refers to a droplet containing a total of g molecules (g = gs + gA + go + gw Xgo is the mole fraction of aggregates of size g in the continuous oil (O) phase,Xsw andAAw are the mole fractions of singly dispersed surfactant and alcohol molecules, respectively, in the dispersed water phase, // w and //A y are their standard chemical potentials, and ysw and yAW are their activity coefficients. X0o denotes the mole fraction of oil in the continuous oil phase, /Iqq is its standard chemical potential, and yoo is its activity coefficient. 

Emissions of soot on the other hand represent a smaller fraction of the overall emission, but are probably of greater concern from the standpoint of visibility and health effects. It has been suggested that soot emissions from fuel oil flames result from processes occurring in the vicinity of individual droplets (droplet soot) before macroscale mixing of vaporized material, and from reactions in the bulk gas stream (bulk soot) remote from individual droplets. Droplet soot appears to dominate under local fuel lean conditions (1, 2), while bulk soot formation occurs in fuel rich zones. Factors which are known to affect soot formation from liquid fuel flames include local stoichiometry, droplet size, gas-droplet relative velocity and fuel properties (primarily C H ratio). 

In such concentrated disperse systems three types of liquid films form foam films (G/L/G), water-emulsion films (O/W/O) and non-symmetric films (O/W/G). The kinetics of thinning of these films, their permeability as well as the energy barrier impeding the film rupture determine the stability of these systems. They might be subjected to internal collapse, i.e. coalescence of bubbles or droplets and increase in their average size, or to destruction as a whole, i.e. separation into their initial phases - gas, oil and water. 

Approaches to blast protection can be categorised as active (deployed upon detection of an explosion) or passive (always present). An example of an active mitigation system is the water deluge system used on offshore oil and gas platforms [9]. Upon detection of a gas leak, the entire area is showered with carefiilly sized water droplets in order to prevent ignition and remove the energy from a vapour cloud explosion. An active system can only work if the imminent explosion can be detected and a suitable system deployed in time. These systems work offshore because the gas leak, which accumulates relatively slowly, can be detected easily and the water system deployed. A number of researchers have worked on the detection and deployment of mitigation devices for explosive detonations with military applications [10,11]. Such systems have yet to be deployed in the military, and (at the time of writing) no such detection systems are available for the case of explosive detonation on board an aircraft. For such a system to be viable, it would need to be robust and inexpensive to install and operate. 

---