Mixing macroscale

Further study is needed of the phenomenon of kinetic limitations to the neutralization of acidic aerosols. Simultaneous occurrences of acidic aerosols at gaseous [NH3] well above the equilibrium values have been reported (56, 67), and it is still unclear whether kinetic limits to microscale neutralization or boundary layer mixing (macroscale) kinetics (or both) are responsible for these limitations. An understanding of the extent of human exposure to acidic aerosols, as well as of the availability of acidic aerosols for wet scavenging... 

Macroscale mixing, macroscale shear rates Particles on the order of 500-1000 /xm and larger, or fluid elements of this size, respond primarily to average velocities at any point in the tank and are characterized as macroscale shear rate sensitive or related to macroscale mixing. Visual inspection of a tank normally yields information on the macroscale mixing performance. 

The shear rate between the average velocities is called macroscale shear present in eddies of 500 p.m or larger in size. The shear rate between the fluctuating velocities, present in smaller than 100 p.m eddies, is called microscale shear. A mixing tank, therefore, has several types of shear, ie, macroscale and microscale, maximum and minimum, average in the impeller zone and in the entire tank. 

In addition, the turbulent fluctuations set up a microscale type of shear rate. Microscale mixing tends to affect particles that are less than 100 /xm in size. The scaleup rules are quite different for macroscale controlled process in comparison to microscale. For example, in microscale processes, the major variables are the power per unit volume dissipated in various points in the vessel and the total average power per unit volume. In macroscale mixing, the energy level is important, as well as the geometry and design of the impeller blades and the way that they set up macroscale shear rates in the tank. 

The lower horsepower is an important factor in the efficient design of axial flow or fluidfoil impellers. Such lower horsepower must be considered in the efficient design involving fluid velocity and overall macroscale mixing phenomena. On the other hand, if the process involves a certain amount of microscale mixing, or certain amounts of shear rate, then the fluidfoil impeller may not be the best choice. 

Recently, one of the most practical results of these studies has been the ability to design pilot plant experiments (and, in many cases, plant-scale experiments) that can establish the sensitivity of process to macroscale mixing variables (as a function of power, pumping capacity, impeller diameter, impeller tip speeds, and macroscale shear rates) in contrast to microscale mixing variables (which are relative to power per unit volume, rms velocity fluctuations, and some estimation of the size of the microscale eddies). 

If separation of the microscale mixing phenomenon from the macroscale mixing phenomenon is desired, then it is necessary to systematically vary the ratio of blade width to blade diameter. 

Emissions of soot on the other hand represent a smaller fraction of the overall emission, but are probably of greater concern from the standpoint of visibility and health effects. It has been suggested that soot emissions from fuel oil flames result from processes occurring in the vicinity of individual droplets (droplet soot) before macroscale mixing of vaporized material, and from reactions in the bulk gas stream (bulk soot) remote from individual droplets. Droplet soot appears to dominate under local fuel lean conditions (1, 2), while bulk soot formation occurs in fuel rich zones. Factors which are known to affect soot formation from liquid fuel flames include local stoichiometry, droplet size, gas-droplet relative velocity and fuel properties (primarily C H ratio). 

When the fluid elements pass through the reactor, the exchange of mass between the fluid elements occurs both on a microscale as well as on a macroscale. The mixing process on a macroscale is characterized by the residence-time distribution of the fluid elements. Usually, only the macromixing is considered to have a... 

Recently reported meso- and macroscale self-assembly approaches conducted, respectively, in the presence of surfactant mesophases [134-136] and colloidal sphere arrays [137] are highly promising for the molecular engineering of novel catalytic mixed metal oxides. These novel methods offer the possibility to control surface and bulk chemistry (e.g. the V oxidation state and P/V ratios), wall nature (i.e. amorphous or nanocrystalline), morphology, pore structures and surface areas of mixed metal oxides. Furthermore, these novel catalysts represent well-defined model systems that are expected to lead to new insights into the nature of the active and selective surface sites and the mechanism of n-butane oxidation. In this section, we describe several promising synthesis approaches to VPO catalysts, such as the self-assembly of mesostructured VPO phases, the synthesis of macroporous VPO phases, intercalation and pillaring of layered VPO phases and other methods. 

Macroporous VPO Phases. - The macroscale templating of bulk mixed metal oxide phases in the presence of colloidal sphere arrays typically consists of three steps shown in Figure 18. First, the interstitial voids of the monodisperse sphere arrays are filled with metal oxide precursors. In the second step, the precursors condense and form a solid framework around the spheres. Finally, the spheres are removed by either calcination or solvent extraction leading to the formation of 3D ordered macroporous structures [137]. 

In macroscale paired electrochemical synthesis it was found that a correct choice of reactor design and good mixing conditions favor the production of cyclopropane adduct over that of the dihydrodimers ... 

These models are not discussed here and the cited papers may be referred to for details of model equations. When macroscale and microscale segregation exist together (bottom left case of Fig. 5.5), none of the cited models are adequate. For such systems, it is necessary to include detailed interaction of fluid mechanics, mixing and reactions in the mathematical model. Various modeling approaches to simulate reactive flow processes with macro- and microscale segregation are discussed briefly below. 

Turbulence is needed to provide adequate contact between the waste and oxygen across the combustion chamber (macroscale mixing). Nevertheless, in the final stage, combustion at the molecular level occurs via diffusion or premixed flames, although the former is the dominant mode of waste destruction in practical systems. 

---