Ohmic resistance/losses

Another strategy for reducing Ohmic resistance losses in a module is to connect many parallel single cells in series. In practice this means that the photovoltage of the modules increases while keeping the current constant. 

Impact of ohmic resistance losses on polarization curve... 

When the activation voltage loss, the ohmic resistance loss, and the mass transport loss are all taken into consideration, the cell voltage will be... 

The losses from pressurization listed in Table 3.14 are theoretical losses. In an electrolysis cell, it is very difficult to achieve a pressure higher than 100 bars due to engineering difficulties and the crossover of the gaseous products through the electrolyte. Typically, people use compressors driven by an electrical motor to pressurize the gases. If the combined efficiency of the electrical motor and the compressor is around 80% by pressurizing H2 from 1 bar to 700 bars, then the overall efficiency of an electrolyzer due to activation loss, ohmic resistance loss, and pressurization loss will be slightly more than 70% (90% x 70%). 

This Galvani potential difference can be measured with a voltmeter. It represents the maximal driving force of the electron flux from anode to cathode. Since it is reasonable to assume that electron transport in metal wires occurs under negligible ohmic resistance losses, the potential difference between metal ports at anode and cathode is almost completely available to perform electrical work in electrical loads or appliances, indicated in Figure 1.1. The standard EMF of the H2/O2 fuel cell is... 

The variables Hact a and riacu are the activation overpotentials at the anode and cathode, respectively, nohm is the ohmic resistance losses in the fuel cell, a and Tin,t c are the mass transfer losses at the anode and cathode, respectively. These are discussed here. 

With eveiy change in ion concentration, there is an electrical effect generated by an electrochemical cell. The anion membrane shown in the middle has three cells associated with it, two caused by the concentration differences in the boundaiy layers, and one resulting from the concentration difference across the membrane. In addition, there are ohmic resistances for each step, resulting from the E/I resistance through the solution, boundary layers, and the membrane. In solution, current is carried by ions, and their movement produces a fric tion effect manifested as a resistance. In practical applications, I R losses are more important than the power required to move ions to a compartment wim a higher concentration. 

A qualitative measure of the corrosion rate can be obtained from the slope of the curves in Fig. 2. Z INT is given in units of s ohm" . Owing to the presence of the uncompensated ohmic resistance and lack of values for Tafel slopes [Eq. (2)], data in Fig. 2 should be viewed as indicative of significant changes in corrosion rates. Corrosion loss remained low during the first 2 months, followed by a large increase for both flushed samples and controls. The corrosion rate increased when the surface pH reached values of 1 or less. Total corrosion loss as determined from integrated Rp data was less for the control than for the flushed sample. 

The activation polarization loss is dominant at low current density. At this point, electronic barriers have to be overcome prior to current and ion flow. Activation losses show some increase as current increases. Ohmic polarization (loss) varies directly with current, increasing over the whole range of current because cell resistance remains essentially constant. Gas transport losses occur over the entire range of current density, but these losses become prominent at high limiting currents where it becomes difficult to provide enough reactant flow to the cell reaction sites. 

Lifetime performance degradation is a key performance parameter in a fuel cell system, but the causes of this degradation are not fully understood. The sources of voltage decay are kinetic or activation loss, ohmic or resistive loss, loss of mass transport, or loss of reformate tolerance (17). 

The tape casting and electrophoretic deposition processes are amenable to scaleup, and thin electrolyte structures (0.25-0.5 mm) can be produced. The ohmic resistance of an electrolyte structure and the resulting ohmic polarization have a large influence on the operating voltage of MCFCs (14). FCE has stated that the electrolyte matrix encompasses 70% of the ohmic loss (15). At a current density of 160 mA/cm, the voltage drop (AVohm) of an 0.18 cm thick electrolyte structure, with a specific conductivity of -0.3 ohm cm at 650°C, was found to obey the relationship (13). 

Under ideal operation of PEFCs, the membrane would retain a uniformly saturated level of hydration, providing the highest proton conductivity, (7p The PEM would therefore perform like a linear ohmic resistance, with irreversible voltage losses ... 

Ideally, the potentiostat should control the interfacial potential only, without interference of ohmic losses. However, it can be seen in Fig. 9 that the voltage difference between I.E. and R.E. necessarily comprises a contribution / x Ru, where Ru is the ohmic resistance residing between the connection to I.E. and the point where the tip of the R.E. contacts the electrolyte solution. Even if this contact is brought very close to the interface by means of a so-called Luggin capillary [41], this contribution may be not negligible. The most sophisticated way to minimize the... 

For an electrolyser, instead of an isentropic coefficient, we take into account the overvoltage necessary for driving the electrolysis (ohmic resistance, anodic-cathodic overvoltage) here the exergy loss is simply connected to this overvoltage by Faraday s law ... 

At low currents, near equilibrium, the power losses are close to R, x. P. At high currents, the electron transfer resistance becomes R x T/(nFinversely proportional to the current density. It is generally negligible in comparison with the ohmic resistance. 

---