Nucleus motion

We treat, in this chapter, mainly solid composed of water molecules such as ices and clathrate hydrates, and show recent significant contribution of simulation studies to our understanding of thermodynamic stability of those crystals in conjunction with structural morphology. Simulation technique adopted here is not limited to molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations[l] but does include other method such as lattice dynamics. Electronic state as well as nucleus motion can be solved by the density functional theory[2]. Here we focus, however, our attention on the ambient condition where electronic state and character of the chemical bonds of individual molecules remain intact. Thus, we restrict ourselves to the usual simulation with intermolecular interactions given a priori. 

The ground-state wave function, and the energy eigenvalue, g, of this system are expressed by Eq. (1.149) in a way analogous to the valence bond method described for the hydrogen molecule, where k is the force constant of the nucleus motion. 

The miderstanding of the quantum mechanics of atoms was pioneered by Bohr, in his theory of the hydrogen atom. This combined the classical ideas on planetary motion—applicable to the atom because of the fomial similarity of tlie gravitational potential to tlie Coulomb potential between an electron and nucleus—with the quantum ideas that had recently been introduced by Planck and Einstein. This led eventually to the fomial theory of quaiitum mechanics, first discovered by Heisenberg, and most conveniently expressed by Schrodinger in the wave equation that bears his name. 

Dispersion forces caimot be explained classically but a semiclassical description is possible. Consider the electronic charge cloud of an atom to be the time average of the motion of its electrons around the nucleus. 

It was stated above that the Schrodinger equation cannot be solved exactly for any molecular systems. However, it is possible to solve the equation exactly for the simplest molecular species, Hj (and isotopically equivalent species such as ITD" ), when the motion of the electrons is decoupled from the motion of the nuclei in accordance with the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation. The masses of the nuclei are much greater than the masses of the electrons (the resting mass of the lightest nucleus, the proton, is 1836 times heavier than the resting mass of the electron). This means that the electrons can adjust almost instantaneously to any changes in the positions of the nuclei. The electronic wavefunction thus depends only on the positions of the nuclei and not on their momenta. Under the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation the total wavefunction for the molecule can be written in the following form ... 

The force on one nucleus due to sPetching or compressing the bond is equal to the force constant of the bond k times the distance between the nuclei x2 — xi). It is equal and opposite to the force acting on the other nucleus, and it is also equal to the mass times the acceleration x by Newton s second law (see section on the hamionic oscillator in Chapter 4). The equations of motion are... 

In contrast, the curve for V3 in Figure 6.38(b) is symmetrical about the centre. It is approximately parabolic but shows steeper sides corresponding to the reluctance of an oxygen nucleus to approach the carbon nucleus at either extreme of the vibrational motion. 

At this point the nomenclature used in XPS and AES should be explained. In XPS the spectroscopic notation is used, and in AES the X-ray notation. The two are equivalent, the different usage having arisen for historical reasons, but the differentiation is a convenient one. They are both based on the so-called j-j coupling scheme describing the orbital motion of an electron around an atomic nucleus, in which the... 

We can anticipate that the highly defective lattice and heterogeneities within which the transformations are nucleated and grow will play a dominant role. We expect that nucleation will occur at localized defect sites. If the nucleation site density is high (which we expect) the bulk sample will transform rapidly. Furthermore, as Dremin and Breusov have pointed out [68D01], the relative material motion of lattice defects and nucleation sites provides an environment in which material is mechanically forced to the nucleus at high velocity. Such behavior was termed a roller model and is depicted in Fig. 2.14. In these catastrophic shock situations, the transformation kinetics and perhaps structure must be controlled by the defective solid considerations. In this case perhaps the best published succinct statement... 

Dendrites can grow at constant speed at arbitrarily small undercooling A, but usually a non-zero value of the anisotropy e is required. The growth pattern evolving from a nucleus acquires a star-shaped envelope surrounding a well-defined backbone. The distances between the corners of the envelope increase with time. For small undercooling we can use the scaling relation for the motion of the corners as for free dendrites [103-106] with tip... 

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is the first of several approximations used to simplify the solution of the Schradinger equation. It simplifies the general molecular problem by separating nuclear and electronic motions. This approximation is reasonable since the mass of a typical nucleus is thousands of times greater than that of an electron. The nuclei move very slowly with respect to the electrons, and the electrons react essentially instantaneously to changes in nuclear position. Thus, the electron distribution within a molecular system depends on the positions of the nuclei, and not on their velocities. Put another way, the nuclei look fixed to the electrons, and electronic motion can be described as occurring in a field of fixed nuclei. 

A. Bohr (Copenhagen), B. Mottelson (Copenhagen) and J. Rainwater (New York) discovery of the connection between collective motion and particle motion in atomic nuclei and the development of the theory of the structure of the atomic nucleus based on this connection. 

A convenient orbital method for describing eleetron motion in moleeules is the method of molecular orbitals. Molecular orbitals are defined and calculated in the same way as atomic orbitals and they display similar wave-like properties. The main difference between molecular and atomic orbitals is that molecular orbitals are not confined to a single atom. The crests and troughs in an atomic orbital are confined to a region close to the atomic nucleus (typieally within 1-2 A). The electrons in a molecule, on the other hand, do not stick to a single atom, and are free to move all around the molecule. Consequendy, the crests and troughs in a molecular orbital are usually spread over several atoms. 

The lowest energy molecular orbital of singlet methylene looks like a Is atomic orbital on carbon. The electrons occupying this orbital restrict their motion to the immediate region of the carbon nucleus and do not significantly affect bonding. Because of this restriction, and because the orbital s energy is very low (-11 au), this orbital is referred to as a core orbital and its electrons are referred to as core electrons. 

Mit-bewegung, /. associated movement, comovement relative motion (as of the atomic nucleus), -bewerber, m. competitor, mit-einander, adv. with one another, together. 

Usually, nuclear relaxation data for the study of reorientational motions of molecules and molecular segments are obtained for non-viscous liquids in the extreme narrowing region where the product of the resonance frequency and the reorientational correlation time is much less than unity [1, 3, 5]. The dipolar spin-lattice relaxation rate of nucleus i is then directly proportional to the reorientational correlation time p... 

How large is an atom We cannot answer this question for an isolated atom. We can, however, devise experiments in which we can find how closely the nucleus of one atom can approach the nucleus of another atom. As atoms approach, they are held apart by the repulsion of the positively charged nuclei. The electrons of the two atoms also repel one another but they are attracted by the nuclei. The closeness of approach of two nuclei will depend upon a balance between the repulsive and attractive forces. It also depends upon the energy of motion of the atoms as they approach one another. If we think of atoms as spheres, we find that their diameters vary from 0.000 000 01 to 0.000 000 05 cm (from 1 X 10-8 to 5 X 10 8 cm). Nuclei are much smaller. A typical nuclear diameter is 10, s cm, about 1/100,000 the atom diameter. 

Quantum mechanics provides a mathematical framework that leads to expression (4). In addition, for the hydrogen atom it tells us a great deal about how the electron moves about the nucleus. It does not, however, tell us an exact path along which the electron moves. All that can be done is to predict the probability of finding an electron at a given point in space. This probability, considered over a period of time, gives an averaged picture of how an electron behaves. This description of the electron motion is what we have called an orbital. 

Impulses from the vestibular apparatus in the labyrinth are conducted via the vestibular nucleus and cerebellum to the vomiting centre. Abnormal stimulation of the vestibular apparatus is involved in motion sickness and emesis, associated with Menieres disease. 

It has been found possible to evaluate s0 theoretically by means of the following treatment (1) Each electron shell within the atom is idealised as a uniform surface charge of electricity of amount — zte on a sphere whose radius is equal to the average value of the electron-nucleus distance of the electrons in the shell. (2) The motion of the electron under consideration is then determined by the use of the old quantum theory, the azimuthal quantum number being chosen so as to produce the closest approximation to the quantum... 

According to the classical theory, the effect of a magnetic field on a system composed of electrons in motion about a fixed nucleus is equivalent to the first order of approximation to the imposition on the system of a uniform rotation... 

---