Non-protic

Since IR spectra are essentially due to vibrational transitions, many substituents with single bonds or isolated double bonds give rise to characteristic absorption bands within a limited frequency range in contrast, the absorption due to conjugated multiple bonds is usually not characteristic and cannot be ascribed to any particular grouping. Thus IR spectra afford reference data for identification of pyrimidines, for the identification of certain attached groups and as an aid in studying qualitatively the tautomerism (if any) of pyrimidinones, pyrimidinethiones and pyrimidinamines in the solid state or in non-protic solvents (see Section 2.13.1.8). 

The employment of non-protic electrophiles for the foregoing type of cyclizations as illustrated in Scheme 8 has the particular merit of leaving a useful point of departure for further transformations. Comparable cyclizations of 2-allyl-3-aminocyclohexenones with mercury(II) acetate are preceded by dehydrogenation to the corresponding 2-allyl-3-aminophenol as shown in Scheme 9 82TL3591). The preferred direction of cyclization depends upon the nucleophilicity of the amino group. 

For copolymerizations between non protie monomers solvent effects are less marked. Indeed, early work concluded that the reactivity ratios in copolymerizations involving only non-protic monomers (eg. S, MMA, AN, VAe, etc.) should show no solvent dependence.100101 More recent studies on these and other systems (e.g. AN-S,102-105 E-VAc,106 MAN-S,107 MMA-S,10s "° MMA-VAc1" ) indicate small yet significant solvent effects (some recent data for AN-S copolymerization are shown in Table 8.5). However, the origin of the solvent effect in these cases is not clear. There have been various attempts to rationalize solvent effects on copolymerization by establishing correlations between radical reactivity and various solvent and monomer properties.71,72 97 99 None has been entirely successful. 

So far as actual changes of mechanistic pathway with change of solvent are concerned, increase in solvent polarity and ion-solvating ability may (but not necessarily will) change the reaction mode from SN2— SN1. Transfer from hydroxylic to polar, non-protic solvents (e.g. DMSO) can, and often do, change the reaction mode from SN1 — Sn2 by enormously increasing the effectiveness of the nucleophile in the system. 

Finally it should be mentioned that a number of nucleophilic substitution reactions of unactivated halides can be made to proceed in bipolar non-protic solvents such as dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), Me2S —Oe. No hydrogen-bonded solvent envelope, as in for example MeOH, then needs to be stripped from Ye before it can function as a nucleophile AG is thus much lower and the reaction correspondingly faster. Rate differences of as much as 109 have been observed on changing the solvent from MeOH to Me2SO. Chlorobenzene will thus react readily under these conditions with Me3COe ... 

Bromine-catalysed bromination in non-protic and halogenated solvents 276 Solvation, the driving force of electrophilic bromination 278... 

BROMINE-CATALYSED BROMINATION IN NON-PROTIC AND HALOGENATED SOLVENTS... 

The most significant difference between brominations in protic and non-protic solvents concerns the kinetic law. Whereas in protic media the reaction is first-order in bromine, in halogenated media it is second-order (Bellucci et ai, 1980). CTC ionization is electrophilically assisted by hydrogen bonding by a protic solvent to the leaving bromide and leads to a bromonium-bromide ion pair. In non-protic media, assistance to the bromination step is provided by a second bromine molecule, leading to a bromonium-tribromide ion pair. In other words, in protic media bromination is solvent-assisted (56) while in halogenated media it is bromine-catalysed (57). 

According to (57), the main driving force for the reaction in non-protic media is the formation of a tribromide ion from bromine and the developing bromide. Kinetic (Ruasse et al., 1986) and thermodynamic (Bienvenue-Goetz et al., 1980) data on equilibrium (58) are therefore relevant to the effect of non-protic solvents on bromination rates. 

For example, the substituted aniline Ar-NH2 (Ar = />-CH3OC6H4) reacts with the ruthenium nitrosyl complex Ru(bpy)2(Cl)(NO)2+ (bpy = 2,2 -bipyridine) to give a complex of the diazo ligand, namely Ru(bpy)2(Cl)(NNAr)2+ (57). Upon employing the 15N labeled nitrosyl complex Ru(bpy)2Cl(15NO)2+ this reaction resulted in the 15N coordinated product, Ru(bpy)2Cl(15NNAr)2+, demonstrating that the reaction occurs within the metal complex coordination sphere. When the reactions were conducted in non-protic solvents, these nucleophile-nitrosyl adducts could be isolated. 

An alternative procedure to effect elimination resolves this problem. Opening the oxaspiropentane 26 with selenide anion in a non-protic solvent effects a direct elimination via a merged substitution — elimination mechanism to give the vinyl-... 

Finally, in the presence of halide salts (bromide or chloride, which in low polarity non-protic solvents bind to Br2 to give a stable trihalide species), the addition reaction proceeds through a rate- and product-determining nucleophilic attack of Br anion on the 1 1 it complex, Scheme 2 path c. No intermediate is formed in this latter reaction the nucleophilic attack of halide (X ) and the Br-Br bond breaking are indeed concerted, although not necessarily synchronous. 

For such reasons, the following section considers in more detail some of the most significant results obtained by our team on the epoxidation with TBHP of unsaturated FAMEs over mesoporous titanium-grafted silicates. In these examples, the epoxidation tests were carried out either in ethyl acetate, which could be even obtained, in principle, from renewable sources and which is relatively less harmful than other polar non-protic solvents, or under solvent-free conditions. 

Attention should be paid to the additional hydrogen bonding effect in protic solvents like alcohols. It has indeed been observed that correlations of solvent-dependent properties (especially positions and intensities of absorption and emission bands) with the fcT(30) scale often follow two distinct lines, one for non-protic solvents and one for protic solvents. 

When radicals are produced electrochemically in the same solvents and under similar conditions again only one nitrogen splitting is observed in the e.s.r. spectrum. The change to a non-protic solvent. 

---