Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Neutral diffusion model

Four observation were thought to be in disagreement with the diffusion model (1) the lack of a proportional relationship between the electron scavenging product and the decrease of H2 yield (2) the lack of significant acid effect on the molecular yield of H2 (3) the relative independence from pH of the isotope separation factor for H2 yield and (4) the fact that with certain solutes the scavenging curves for H2 are about the same for neutral and acid solutions. Schwarz s reconciliation follows. [Pg.216]

Mahlman and Sworski (1967) found that curves for scavenging of H2 by NOj- have nearly the same shape for neutral and 0.1 M acid solutions, over the concentration range 1 mM to 0.4 M of the solute, despite the fact that nitrate reacts much faster with eh than with H. Schwarz points out, however, that when two solutes (H+ and N03-) compete for the same intermediate (eh), the extrapolation to zero scavenger concentration is not a valid procedure. The calculation of the diffusion model agrees with experiment over the entire N03- concentration range. Further, the model predicts a lower H2 yield at very low scavenger concentrations. [Pg.217]

The first subnanosecond experiments on the eh yield were performed at Toronto (Hunt et al., 1973 Wolff et al., 1973). These were followed by the subnanosecond work of Jonah et al. (1976) and the subpicosecond works of Migus et al. (1987) and of Lu et al. (1989). Summarizing, we may note the following (1) the initial (-100 ps) yield of the hydrated electron is 4.6 0.2, which, together with the yield of 0.8 for dry neutralization, gives the total ionization yield in liquid water as 5.4 (2) there is -17% decay of the eh yield at 3 ns, of which about half occurs at 700 ps and (3) there is a relatively fast decay of the yield between 1 and 10 ns. Of these, items (1) and (3) are consistent with the Schwarz form of the diffusion model, but item (2) is not. In the time scale of 0.1-10 ns, the experimental yield is consistently greater than the calculated value. The subpicosecond experiments corroborated this finding and determined the evolution of the absorption spectrum of the trapped electron as well. [Pg.218]

The nearly constant peroxynitrite concentration observed in neutral solution changes dramatically when [Ft] of the solution is increased. Fig. 2 compares the transient absorption of aqueous nitrate at [Ft ] = 10-7 M and [Ft] = 0.140 M. The peroxynitrite concentration drops rapidly as protonation leads to the formation of peronitrous acid (peroxynitrous acids absorbs relatively weakly around 240 nm and is not observable in Fig. 2.). In Fig. 3 the peroxynitrite concentration is represented by the transient absorption at 310 nm as a function of [it]. As expected the formation of peroxynitrous acid increases with the concentration of protons. The protonation of peroxynitrite can be viewed as a prototypical diffusion limited bimolecular reaction and thus constitutes an excellent test bed for diffusion models. [Pg.209]

Hence not only for numerical neutral gas diffusion models , but also for such hybrid Monte Carlo techniques internally consistent expressions for the i 0 1 integrals, for (/ = 0,1,2) must be computed. These fits should then, again, preferentially be given in terms of ln(Teff)-... [Pg.48]

In the case of selective neutrality—this means that all variants have the same selective values—evolution can be modeled successfully by diffusion models. This approach is based on the analysis of partial differential equations that describe free diffusion in a continuous model of the sequence space. The results obtained thereby and their consequences for molecular evolution were recently reviewed by Kimura [2]. Differences in selective values were found to be prohibitive, at least until now, for an exact solution of the diffusion approach. Needless to say, no exact results are available for value landscapes as complicated as those discussed in Section IV.3. Approximations are available for special cases only. In particular, the assumption of rare mutations has to be made almost in every case, and this contradicts the strategy basic to the quasi-species model. [Pg.243]

Computer simulations of both equilibrium and dynamic properties of small solutes indicate that the solubility-diffusion model is not an accurate approximation to the behavior of small, neutral solutes in membranes. This conclusion is supported experimentally [57]. Clearly, packing and ordering effects, as well as electrostatic solute-solvent interactions need to be included. One extreme example are changes in membrane permeability near the gel-liquid crystalline phase transition temperature [56]. Another example is unassisted ion transport across membranes, discussed in the following section. [Pg.502]

In order to be able to explain the observed results plasma modeling was applied. A one-dimensional fluid model was used, which solves the particle balances for both the charged and neutral species, using the drift-diffusion approximation for the particle fluxes, the Poisson equation for the electric field, and the energy balance for the electrons [191] (see also Section 1.4.1). [Pg.153]

To evaluate the contribution of the SHG active oriented cation complexes to the ISE potential, the SHG responses were analyzed on the basis of a space-charge model [30,31]. This model, which was proposed to explain the permselectivity behavior of electrically neutral ionophore-based liquid membranes, assumes that a space charge region exists at the membrane boundary the primary function of lipophilic ionophores is to solubilize cations in the boundary region of the membrane, whereas hydrophilic counteranions are excluded from the membrane phase. Theoretical treatments of this model reported so far were essentially based on the assumption of a double-diffuse layer at the organic-aqueous solution interface and used a description of the diffuse double layer based on the classical Gouy-Chapman theory [31,34]. [Pg.450]

FIG. 14 A model for the uptake of weakly basic compounds into lipid bilayer membrane (inside acidic) in response to the pH difference. For compounds with appropriate pki values, a neutral outside pH results in a mixture of both the protonated form AH (membrane impermeable) and unprotonated form A (membrane permeable) of the compound. The unprotonated form diffuse across the membrane until the inside and outside concentrations are equal. Inside the membrane an acidic interior results in protonation of the neutral unprotonated form, thereby driving continued uptake of the compound. Depending on the quantity of the outside weak base and the buffering capacity of the inside compartment, essentially complete uptake can usually be accomplished. The ratio between inside and outside concentrations of the weakly basic compound at equilibrum should equal the residual pH gradient. [Pg.822]

A much more detailed and time-dependent study of complex hydrocarbon and carbon cluster formation has been prepared by Bettens and Herbst,83 84 who considered the detailed growth of unsaturated hydrocarbons and clusters via ion-molecule and neutral-neutral processes under the conditions of both dense and diffuse interstellar clouds. In order to include molecules up to 64 carbon atoms in size, these authors increased the size of their gas-phase model to include approximately 10,000reactions. The products of many of the unstudied reactions have been estimated via simplified statistical (RRKM) calculations coupled with ab initio and semiempirical energy calculations. The simplified RRKM approach posits a transition state between complex and products even when no obvious potential barrier... [Pg.33]

Great simplification is achieved by introducing the hypothesis of independent reaction times (IRT) that the pairwise reaction times evolve independendy of any other reactions. While the fundamental justification of IRT may not be immediately obvious, one notices its similarity with the molecular pair model of homogeneous diffusion-mediated reactions (Noyes, 1961 Green, 1984). The usefulness of the IRT model depends on the availability of a suitable reaction probability function W(r, a t). For a pair of neutral particles undergoing fully diffusion-con-trolled reactions, Wis given by (a/r) erfc[(r - a)/2(D t)1/2] where If is the mutual diffusion coefficient and erfc is the complement of the error function. [Pg.222]

Green and Pimblott (1989) have extended the IRT model to partially diffusion-controlled reactions between neutrals. They derive an analytical expression that involves an additional parameter, namely the reaction velocity at encounter. For reactions between charged species, W generally cannot be given analytically but must be obtained numerically. Furthermore, numerical inversion to get t then... [Pg.222]


See other pages where Neutral diffusion model is mentioned: [Pg.1179]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1208]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.892]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.831]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.298]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Neutral model

© 2024 chempedia.info