Negative symptoms

Risperidone (11) is a new type of an atypical antipsychotic with relatively pronounced effects on negative symptoms and low extrapyramidal side... 

Neuroleptics or antipsychotics suppress the positive symptoms of schizophrenia such as combativeness, hallucinations and formal thought disorder. Some also alleviate the negative symptoms such as affective blunting, withdrawal and seclusiveness. Neuroleptics also produce a state of apathy and emotional indifference. Most neuroleptics block dopamine D2-receptors but some, like clozapine, also block dopamine D4-receptors or serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine2A-receptors. 

Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide, which acts as a highly selective blocker of D2 and D3 receptors (Kerwin, 2000). As with all the other drugs, it can easily be demonstrated to be effective compared with placebo and haloperidol, with a lower extrapyramidal symptom profile (Moller et al, 1995). The strength of amisulpride lies in the quality of the evidence to show that it is effective against primary negative symptoms and affective symptoms. Two studies have shown convincing superiority for negative symptoms... 

Moller HJ, Muller H, Borison RL, et al (1995). A path analytical approach to differentiate between direct and indirect drug effects on negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients a re-evaluation of the North American Risperidone study. EurArch Psychiatry Clin Neurol243, 45—9. 

Tollefson GD, Sanger TM (1997). Negative symptoms a path analytic approach to a double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial with olanzapine. Am J Psychiatry 154,... 

The first three characteristics are considered to be the positive symptoms of the disorder. The fourth are described as negative symptoms although they can be divided into true negative symptoms, i.e. diminished emotions and speech and reactive ones, i.e. social apathy and withdrawal brought on by the positive symptoms. Schizophrenics do not have a split personality. Normally their reaction to the positive symptoms is to withdraw quietly but occasionally they will react violently to the voices they hear and shout at them. 

The prefrontal cortex (PFQ and in particular the dorsal lateral part (DLPFQ appear to be particularly important in schizophrenia (Kerwin 1992). Lesions there are known to produce functional defects in humans reminiscent of many of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as attention and cognitive defects and withdrawal. Despite this, no specific pathology is seen in the DLPFC in schizophrenics although there is some atrophy and neuronal loss which are normally old and could be congenital. That being so, it is necessary to explain why the symptoms become apparent only in adolescence. 

A DA antagonist could certainly counter the increased mesolimbic activity and the positive symptoms. On the other hand, they would not be expected to reduce negative symptoms if these arise through an already inadequate DA influence. This fits with clinical experience because most of the neuroleptics are ineffective in treating negative symptoms. In fact if the negative symptoms do result from loss of the actual cortical neurons, rather than input to them, they will be difficult to reverse and much will depend on the precise role of DA in the DLPFC (see later). 

Reference has been made already to the shortcomings of the term neuroleptic . We now have a situation in which the drugs that are most useful in schizophrenia are regarded as atypical. While the term was introduced to cover those neuroleptics that do not cause EPSs, it has become synonymous with clozapine which has additional advantages over other neuroleptics (e.g. reduces negative symptoms, see text). Thus it is not always clear what is meant or covered by atypical. Hopefully this distinction between the neuroleptics will become unnecessary as better compounds are developed and the older ones become obsolete. 

The 5-HT3 receptor is found appropriately in mesocortical areas and while behavioural studies with their antagonists in rodents showed potential antipsychotic activity, they have proved ineffective in patients. 5-HTia agonists may be more useful. They have been found to increase the extracellular concentration of DA in the frontal cortex of rats but diminish apomorphine-induced stereotypy (striatal effect). So they could be of some benefit, especially against negative symptoms, without causing EPSPs (see Chapter 9). 

Many of the neuroleptics are a-adrenoceptor antagonists. Some, like chlorpromazine, block d postsynaptic receptors while clozapine (and risperidone) are as potent at 2 as D2 receptors. There is no evidence that either of these actions could influence striatal or mesolimbic function but NA is considered important for function of the prefrontal cortex and any increase in its release, achieved by blocking a2-mediated autoinhibition, might contribute to a reduction in negative symptoms and provide a further plus for clozapine (see Nutt et al. 1997). Centrally, however, most a2-receptors are found postsynaptically and their function, and the effect of blocking them, is uncertain. 

Despite these problems it remains necessary to attempt some explanation in terms of differential NT antagonism, of why clozapine is so effective (see Reynolds 1997) in that it causes fewer EPSs, reduces negative symptoms and is effective in some patients refractory to other drugs. Considering these benefits in turn ... 

Negative symptoms. These may be reduced because either clozapine antagonises appropriate receptors in the prefrontal cortex or it does not act as an antagonist there. This apparently stupid statement is prompted by the lack of knowledge of what is required to reduce negative symptoms. D4 and Di receptors are found in the prefrontal cortex and only clozapine among current neuroleptics is more active at both of these than the D2 receptor. Thus on this basis it is well placed to block DA s... 

Unfortunately although much is known about the pathways and receptors involved in extrapyramidal activity and the mechanism of the EPSs that follow neuroleptic therapy and even the possible origin of negative symptoms in the prefrontal cortex, the precise site of origin and NT involvement in the overriding positive symptoms is less clear. Until that is corrected, permutations of NT antagonisms are likely to multiply with the neuroleptics. 

Figure 17.9 Schematic representation of the proposed activity profile of an ideal neuroleptic. The figure shows DA pathways to the prefrontal cortex, mesolimbic nucleus accumbens and striatum the effects required for an ideal drug on the DA influence and symptoms there and to what extent they are met by most typical and atypical neuroleptics and by clozapine. Note that while all atypical neuroleptics induce few extrapyramidal w side-effects (EPSs) few of them, apart from clozapine, have much beneficial effect in overcoming negative symptoms of schizophrenia ...

Whether the amelioration of negative symptoms results from an action in the cortex and, in particular, the prefrontal cortex requires further study. The fact that clozapine, the atypical drug that is currently most effective in this respect, has actions there which are not shown by other compounds is encouraging even though the precise mechanism by which it works remains to be elucidated. 

It appears that an ideal neuroleptic may need to reduce DA activity in the mesolimbic system (nucleus accumbens) to counter the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, increase it in the prefrontal cortex to overcome negative symptoms and have little or possibly no effect on it in the striatum so EPSs do not arise (Fig. 17.9). No wonder we still await the ideal drug. 

The tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) derive their name from their three-ringed molecular structure (Fig. 20.3) and emerged, in 1958, from a search for better neuroleptics than chlopromazine among the phenothiazines. The prototype, imipramine, turned out to be ineffective in treating the positive symptoms experienced by schizophrenics but it did relieve their depression (negative symptoms). In fact, imipramine is still the standard agent against which novel antidepressants are compared in clinical trials. 

---