Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density of interaction

Wesolowski, T. A. and J. Weber. 1996. Kohn-Sham equations with constrained electron density an iterative evaluation of the ground-state electron density of interacting molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 248,71. [Pg.130]

THE AVERAGE COOPERATIVITY OF THE LINEAR, SQUARE, AND TETRAHEDRAL MODELS THE DENSITY OF INTERACTION ARGUMENT... [Pg.202]

The average correlation, plotted as f(C)- 1, shows that the square model starts initially with a small positive value and increases monotonously to the very large value of 37,348 at C -> < . On the other hand, the g(C) - 1 curve for the tetrahedral model starts from a very small value and reaches the value of about 21,058 at very high concentrations. Clearly, both of the Bis appear as positive cooperative, but with much stronger cooperativity for the square model, in apparent defiance of the density of interaction argument. [Pg.203]

Assuming that the number of specific interacting sites present on the polymer chain coincides with the oxygen atoms, the density of interacting sites per unit of mass of polymer (a = of interacting sites/mass of polymer) is... [Pg.182]

Successful application of chromatographic techniques relies on resolution, or the resolving power of the particular technique used. Resolution is defined by the relation of selectivity and efficiency of the chromatographic gel media (i). Selectivity is a function of the mode of separation of the gel (i.e., gel filtration, ion exchange, etc.) and efficiency is a function of the support matrix (Le., particle shape, size distribution, mechanical stability, density of interactive chemical groups, etc.). Each of the various modes of chromatographic separation have unique advantages that dictate where and when in a purification process these techniques should be used. [Pg.170]

The interactions between the n particles are based on an exchange of discrete values Er = e/e of energies e relative to an unit amount e . The consequence of this exchange is a relative density of interaction energy qnn = (1+Ejn)n in form of a n-fold product with the limit value qr = exp(er) for n—>oo. The exponential expression is assumed because... [Pg.162]

With these assumptions a common characteristic of all macroscopic particle systems can be expressed as qr = exp(e,) = exp(2jt + a) (assumptions 1 and 2). However, taking into consideration a diminution of er which is proportional to the maximum probability pe of place exchange (assumption 3), the value qr = exp(erpe) = exp[(a + 2Jt)/e] = eaf e27t/c = CI/ew becomes the specific relative density of interaction energy for a system where w = e2 and Cl/e = elx/e. [Pg.163]

The remarkable coincidence between the ratios of the critical temperatures, TCJTC within the homologous series and the ratios of the corresponding values of the interaction function w Jw supports the interpretation that this function is a measure of the energy density of interaction. [Pg.165]

In all aggregate states in this model, diffusion is considered to be a consequence of interactions between the particles that are in conformity with the first assumption of the model. This means the diffusion coefficient can be described as an exponential function of a relative density of interaction energy qr. [Pg.168]

The electron densities of local regions of both small and large molecules can be studied in detail using some of the macromolecular quantum chemical computational techniques developed recently. The shape analysis of host-guest systems and the comparison of the electron densities of interacting and noninteracting molecular regions provide measures and detailed descriptions of these interactions. [Pg.609]

The last equality holds for an isotropic and homogeneous system. This result can be understood intuitively For each of the N particles in the system (taken to be at the origin), the potential energy is obtained as a volume integral over the density of interaction energy associated with this particle. The latter is pg(r) (density of other particles at position r), multiplied by u(r). This will lead to double-counting of all interactions and should therefore be divided by 2. The result is (5.37). [Pg.185]

Here NaBe and Na are the number densities of interacting 8 Be and 4 He nuclei and the angular brackets denote thermal averaging over a Maxwell Boltzmann distribution ip(E). This averaging leads to ... [Pg.238]

In other words, the two scaled subsystem external potentials are defined to give rise to the true ground state densities of interacting subsystems, irrespectively of the current value of the the scaled electronic charge, which we indicate by the following mapping relation ... [Pg.240]

Fig. 2 Reversible voltammograms for (top row) a diffusing redox couple reacting at a planar macroelectrode at which the entire surface is interactive (bottom row) a diffusing couple reacting at a microelectrode, or a macroelectrode at which most of the surface is blocked to protein interaction. Theoretical voltammograms are shown at the center, while the right hand side shows actual results obtained for cytochrome c at a polished pyrolytic graphite edge plane (top) or basal plane electrode, (bottom) showing the effect of the density of interactive sites on the electrode. Fig. 2 Reversible voltammograms for (top row) a diffusing redox couple reacting at a planar macroelectrode at which the entire surface is interactive (bottom row) a diffusing couple reacting at a microelectrode, or a macroelectrode at which most of the surface is blocked to protein interaction. Theoretical voltammograms are shown at the center, while the right hand side shows actual results obtained for cytochrome c at a polished pyrolytic graphite edge plane (top) or basal plane electrode, (bottom) showing the effect of the density of interactive sites on the electrode.
Thus, the director variation is nearly equal to the ratio of the anisotropic part of the energy density of interaction between the field and nematic, ej (fi ) 2/ %Ti to the elastic energy density oi the nemat-... [Pg.98]

If the Flory theory is indisputably a reference for the thermodynamics of polymer solutions, it suffers from a lack of accuracy in its description of dilute polymer solutions as previously mentioned. Well suited to the case of concentrated solutions, this theory depicts the behavior of dilute solutions and describes the forces due to excluded volume as the result of a perturbation to random walk statistics for example, it does not account for the significant variations experienced by the density of segments in dilute media. Indeed, the replacement of the radial variation of this function (which describes the density of interaction in the medium) by an average value is not satisfactory. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Density of interaction is mentioned: [Pg.42]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.5322]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.8079]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.18]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.201 , Pg.203 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info