Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular dynamics interface

Two simulation methods—Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics—allow calculation of the density profile and pressure difference of Eq. III-44 across the vapor-liquid interface [64, 65]. In the former method, the initial system consists of N molecules in assumed positions. An intermolecule potential function is chosen, such as the Lennard-Jones potential, and the positions are randomly varied until the energy of the system is at a minimum. The resulting configuration is taken to be the equilibrium one. In the molecular dynamics approach, the N molecules are given initial positions and velocities and the equations of motion are solved to follow the ensuing collisions until the set shows constant time-average thermodynamic properties. Both methods are computer intensive yet widely used. [Pg.63]

In Fig. III-7 we show a molecular dynamics computation for the density profile and pressure difference P - p across the interface of an argonlike system [66] (see also Refs. 67, 68 and citations therein). Similar calculations have been made of 5 in Eq. III-20 [69, 70]. Monte Carlo calculations of the density profile of the vapor-liquid interface of magnesium how stratification penetrating about three atomic diameters into the liquid [71]. Experimental measurement of the transverse structure of the vapor-liquid interface of mercury and gallium showed structures that were indistinguishable from that of the bulk fluids [72, 73]. [Pg.63]

There is, of course, a mass of rather direct evidence on orientation at the liquid-vapor interface, much of which is at least implicit in this chapter and in Chapter IV. The methods of statistical mechanics are applicable to the calculation of surface orientation of assymmetric molecules, usually by introducing an angular dependence to the inter-molecular potential function (see Refs. 67, 68, 77 as examples). Widom has applied a mean-held approximation to a lattice model to predict the tendency of AB molecules to adsorb and orient perpendicular to the interface between phases of AA and BB [78]. In the case of water, a molecular dynamics calculation concluded that the surface dipole density corresponded to a tendency for surface-OH groups to point toward the vapor phase [79]. [Pg.65]

Both the Monte Carlo and the molecular dynamics methods (see Section III-2B) have been used to obtain theoretical density-versus-depth profiles for a hypothetical liquid-vapor interface. Rice and co-workers (see Refs. 72 and 121) have found that density along the normal to the surface tends to be a... [Pg.79]

It was noted in connection with Eq. III-56 that molecular dynamics calculations can be made for a liquid mixture of rare gas-like atoms to obtain surface tension versus composition. The same calculation also gives the variation of density for each species across the interface [88], as illustrated in Fig. Ill-13b. The density profiles allow a calculation, of course, of the surface excess quantities. [Pg.80]

Molecular dynamics calculations have been made on atomic crystals using a Lennard-Jones potential. These have to be done near the melting point in order for the iterations not to be too lengthy and have yielded density functioi). as one passes through the solid-vapor interface (see Ref. 45). The calculations showed considerable mobility in the surface region, amounting to the presence of a... [Pg.266]

Molecular dynamics and density functional theory studies (see Section IX-2) of the Lennard-Jones 6-12 system determine the interfacial tension for the solid-liquid and solid-vapor interfaces [47-49]. The dimensionless interfacial tension ya /kT, where a is the Lennard-Jones molecular size, increases from about 0.83 for the solid-liquid interface to 2.38 for the solid-vapor at the triple point [49], reflecting the large energy associated with a solid-vapor interface. [Pg.267]

Many of the fiindamental physical and chemical processes at surfaces and interfaces occur on extremely fast time scales. For example, atomic and molecular motions take place on time scales as short as 100 fs, while surface electronic states may have lifetimes as short as 10 fs. With the dramatic recent advances in laser tecluiology, however, such time scales have become increasingly accessible. Surface nonlinear optics provides an attractive approach to capture such events directly in the time domain. Some examples of application of the method include probing the dynamics of melting on the time scale of phonon vibrations [82], photoisomerization of molecules [88], molecular dynamics of adsorbates [89, 90], interfacial solvent dynamics [91], transient band-flattening in semiconductors [92] and laser-induced desorption [93]. A review article discussing such time-resolved studies in metals can be found in... [Pg.1296]

HyperChem uses th e ril 31 water m odel for solvation. You can place th e solute in a box of T1P3P water m oleeules an d impose periodic boun dary eon dition s. You may then turn off the boundary conditions for specific geometry optimi/.aiion or molecular dynamics calculations. However, th is produces undesirable edge effects at the solvent-vacuum interface. [Pg.62]

The in ternal arch itecture of HyperChem back ends is different from that expected to be used by third-party packages. To a third-party agent wishing to interface with HyperChem, HyperChem always acts as a server. Thus a third-party molecular dynamics package w oiild ask HyperChem to send th e coordinates of a mide-cu le rath cr th an HvperCIhem determ in in g on its own that it should send coordinates at the appropriate time. [Pg.157]

The molecular dynamics analyzes times steps, also called snapshots (coordinates and velocities), for display, averaging, and plotting (possibly from other applications). In the present release of HyperChem, two particular sources are relevant (the DDE interface allows the possibility of other generators of snapshots as well). The first source are time steps that are computed, displayed, and averaged. This is the normal real-time use of HyperChem molecular dyn amics. [Pg.325]

By far the most common methods of studying aqueous interfaces by simulations are the Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC) technique and the classical molecular dynamics (MD) techniques. They will not be described here in detail, because several excellent textbooks and proceedings volumes (e.g., [2-8]) on the subject are available. In brief, the stochastic MC technique generates microscopic configurations of the system in the canonical (NYT) ensemble the deterministic MD method solves Newton s equations of motion and generates a time-correlated sequence of configurations in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble. Structural and thermodynamic properties are accessible by both methods the MD method provides additional information about the microscopic dynamics of the system. [Pg.349]

M. R. Philpott, J. N. Glosli. Molecular dynamics simulation of interfacial electrochemical processes electric double layer screening. In G. Jerkiewicz, M. P. Soriaga, K. Uosaki, A. Wieckowski, eds. Solid Liquid Electrochemical Interfaces, Vol. 656 of ACS Symposium Series. Washington ACS, 1997, Chap. 2, pp. 13-30. [Pg.381]

K. Heinzinger. Molecular dynamics of water at interfaces. In J. Lipkowski, P. N. Ross, eds. Structure of Electrified Interfaces, Erontiers of Electrochemistry. New York VCH 1993, Chap 7, p. 239. [Pg.381]

M. L. Berkowitz, I.-C. Yeh, E. Spohr. Structure of water at the water/metal interface. Molecular dynamics computer simulations. In A. Wieckowski, ed. Interfacial Electrochemistry. New York Marcel Dekker, 1999, (in press). [Pg.383]

In this situation computer simulation is useful, since the conditions of the simulation can be chosen such that full equihbrium is established, and one can test the theoretical concepts more stringently than by experiment. Also, it is possible to deal with ideal and perfectly flat surfaces, very suitable for testing the general mechanisms alluded to above, and to disregard in a first step all the complications that real substrate surfaces have (corrugation on the atomistic scale, roughness on the mesoscopic scale, surface steps, adsorbed impurities, etc.). Of course, it may be desirable to add such complications at a later stage, but this will not be considered here. In fact, computer simulations, i.e., molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations, have been extensively used to study both static and dynamic properties [11] in particular, structural properties at interfaces have been considered in detail [12]. [Pg.556]

D. Y. Yoon, M. Vacatello, G. D. Smith. Simulation studies of polymer melts at interfaces. In K. Binder, ed. Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science. New York Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 422-A15. [Pg.624]

B. Smit. Molecular dynamics simulations of amphiphihc molecules at liquid-liquid interface. Phys Rev A 57 3431-36, 1988. [Pg.626]

The function / incorporates the screening effect of the surfactant, and is the surfactant density. The exponent x can be derived from the observation that the total interface area at late times should be proportional to p. In two dimensions, this implies R t) oc 1/ps and hence x = /n. The scaling form (20) was found to describe consistently data from Langevin simulations of systems with conserved order parameter (with n = 1/3) [217], systems which evolve according to hydrodynamic equations (with n = 1/2) [218], and also data from molecular dynamics of a microscopic off-lattice model (with n= 1/2) [155]. The data collapse has not been quite as good in Langevin simulations which include thermal noise [218]. [Pg.667]

These apparent restrictions in size and length of simulation time of the fully quantum-mechanical methods or molecular-dynamics methods with continuous degrees of freedom in real space are the basic reason why the direct simulation of lattice models of the Ising type or of solid-on-solid type is still the most popular technique to simulate crystal growth processes. Consequently, a substantial part of this article will deal with scientific problems on those time and length scales which are simultaneously accessible by the experimental STM methods on one hand and by Monte Carlo lattice simulations on the other hand. Even these methods, however, are too microscopic to incorporate the boundary conditions from the laboratory set-up into the models in a reahstic way. Therefore one uses phenomenological models of the phase-field or sharp-interface type, and finally even finite-element methods, to treat the diffusion transport and hydrodynamic convections which control a reahstic crystal growth process from the melt on an industrial scale. [Pg.855]

While thin polymer films may be very smooth and homogeneous, the chain conformation may be largely distorted due to the influence of the interfaces. Since the size of the polymer molecules is comparable to the film thickness those effects may play a significant role with ultra-thin polymer films. Several recent theoretical treatments are available [136-144,127,128] based on Monte Carlo [137-141,127, 128], molecular dynamics [142], variable density [143], cooperative motion [144], and bond fluctuation [136] model calculations. The distortion of the chain conformation near the interface, the segment orientation distribution, end distribution etc. are calculated as a function of film thickness and distance from the surface. In the limit of two-dimensional systems chains segregate and specific power laws are predicted [136, 137]. In 2D-blends of polymers a particular microdomain morphology may be expected [139]. Experiments on polymers in this area are presently, however, not available on a molecular level. Indications of order on an... [Pg.385]

Fig. 7 Molecular dynamics calculations, open circles, for the velocity of the crystal-melt interface versus the temperature of the interface. The solid curve corresponds to eq. (1) and the dashed curve to eq. (3). Fig. 7 Molecular dynamics calculations, open circles, for the velocity of the crystal-melt interface versus the temperature of the interface. The solid curve corresponds to eq. (1) and the dashed curve to eq. (3).
The simulation of a first-order phase transition, especially one where the two phases have a significant difference in molecular area, can be difficult in the context of a molecular dynamics simulation some of the works already described are examples of this problem. In a molecular dynamics simulation it can be hard to see coexistence of phases, especially when the molecules are fairly complicated so that a relatively small system size is necessary. One approach to this problem, described by Siepmann et al. [369] to model the LE-G transition, is to perform Monte Carlo simulations in the Gibbs ensemble. In this approach, the two phases are simulated in two separate but coupled boxes. One of the possible MC moves is to move a molecule from one box to the other in this manner two coexisting phases may be simulated without an interface. Siepmann et al. used the chain and interface potentials described in the Karaborni et al. works [362-365] for a 15-carbon carboxylic acid (i.e. pen-tadecanoic acid) on water. They found reasonable coexistence conditions from their simulations, implying, among other things, the existence of a stable LE state in the Karaborni model, though the LE phase is substantially denser than that seen experimentally. The re-... [Pg.125]


See other pages where Molecular dynamics interface is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.1744]    [Pg.2589]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.130]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Dynamic interfaces

Molecular dynamics simulations electrode-electrolyte interface

© 2024 chempedia.info