Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mole fraction, various component

Figure 7.1 Mole fraction of component 1 in copolymers (Fj) and feedstock (fi) for various values of ri and r2. Figure 7.1 Mole fraction of component 1 in copolymers (Fj) and feedstock (fi) for various values of ri and r2.
The analytical equipment will most often come with its own data processing software and hardware. The output presented at the end of each analysis is therefore in the form of a file reporting, say, mole fractions of components in the sample. In order to carry out an analysis the TSR software must trigger the taking of a sample at appropriate times, simultaneously record the various parameters of the system at those times, and wait for the analysis to be completed on the analytical setup. Then the TSR software must either trigger the transmission of the analysis report or be prepared to accept the analytical report at the time it is automatically sent out by the analytical equipment. In both cases, the analytical file must be assigned to the conditions at the time of sampling. [Pg.296]

When the liquid consists of two or more components, those with higher vapor pressures will be enriched in the vapor phase. The total pressure on the system will be the sum of the partial pressures of the various components. Thus, in an ideal system, the mole fraction of component i in the vapor space will be... [Pg.1081]

Electronic and ionic conduction processes in a liquid are influenced by the presence of solutes. These may have been added on purpose or they might represent impurities. Various measures for the concentration of a solute in a liquid are in use. For discussions within the framework of the kinetic theory, concentrations are given as number density of particles or as molar quantities. As a relative measure the mole fraction, X, is used. If a solution contains n moles of component A, ne moles of component B, n moles of component C, and so on, then the mole fraction of component A is given as... [Pg.29]

K-factors for vapor-liquid equilibrium ratios are usually associated with various hydrocarbons and some common impurities as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide [48]. The K-factor is the equilibrium ratio of the mole fraction of a component in the vapor phase divided by the mole fraction of the same component in the liquid phase. K is generally considered a function of the mixture composition in which a specific component occurs, plus the temperature and pressure of the system at equilibrium. [Pg.4]

The activities of the various components 1,2,3. .. of an ideal solution are, according to the definition of an ideal solution, equal to their mole fractions Ni, N2,. . . . The activity, for present purposes, may be taken as the ratio of the partial pressure Pi of the constituent in the solution to the vapor pressure P of the pure constituent i in the liquid state at the same temperature. Although few solutions conform even approximately to ideal behavior at all concentrations, it may be shown that the activity of the solvent must converge to its mole fraction Ni as the concentration of the solute(s) is made sufficiently small. According to the most elementary considerations, at sufficiently high dilutions the activity 2 of the solute must become proportional to its mole fraction, provided merely that it does not dissociate in solution. In other words, the escaping tendency of the solute must be proportional to the number of solute particles present in the solution, if the solution is sufficiently dilute. This assertion is equally plausible for monomeric and polymeric solutes, although the... [Pg.269]

Since dosage forms contain more than just active drug, it is of practical interest to understand how the various components from a multicomponent solid influence their own dissolution and release. Nelson [18] was one of the first pharma-ceuticists to ponder this question and perform the initial dissolution studies. Unfortunately, Nelson initially considered the dissolution of interacting solids (benzoic acid + trisodium phosphate), which is a more complicated and more complex situation than simple multicomponent dissolution of noninteracting solids. Nelson did show that for his benzoic acid and trisodium phosphate pellets, there was a maximum increase in benzoic acid dissolution in water at a mole fraction ratio of 2 1 (benzoic acid trisodium phosphate) and that the benzoic acid dissolution rate associated with the maximum rate was some 40 times greater than that of benzoic acid alone. [Pg.135]

For a differential reactor, the change in composition across the reactor will be very small, and the bulk fluid composition may be estimated from the inlet molal flow rates. Assuming that the inlet air is 79% nitrogen and 21% oxygen, the calculations below indicate the bulk fluid mole fractions and partial pressures of the various components of the reaction mixture. [Pg.480]

With proper design and implementation, however, it is possible to construct a self-sorting system whose behavior is different from its components [33c]. For example, consider the simple system comprising two hosts (A and B) and two guests (M and N) that can form four possible host-guest complexes (AM, AN, BM, and BN). We fix the total concentrations of hosts A and B ([A J and [B J) at 1 mM and choose the four equilibrium constants such that host A (KT-fold) and host B (10-fold) both prefer guest M (Scheme 4.7). The various mole fraction definitions (Scheme 4.7c) are used to construct a plot (Scheme 4.7d) of the composition of the mixture as a function of total guest concentration ([M J = [Nj J). When [AjJ = [Bj J > = [Nj j], complexes AM and BN dominate because... [Pg.125]

Boyd and Vaslov (6) showed that the curve of log fa vs. mole fraction (where fa is the surface fluidity) for mixed monolayers exhibits additivity for mixed films of miscible components, positive deviation for immiscible components, and negative deviation for components having molecular interactions. Figure 5 shows various interactions which occur... [Pg.203]

Determination of T y. In the formulation of the phase equilibrium problem presented earlier, component chemical potentials were separated into three terms (1) 0, which expresses the primary temperature dependence, (2) solution mole fractions, which represent the primary composition dependence (ideal entropic contribution), and (3) 1, which accounts for relative mixture nonidealities. Because little data about the experimental properties of solutions exist, Tg is usually evaluated by imposing a model to describe the behavior of the liquid and solid mixtures and estimating model parameters by semiempirical methods or fitting limited segments of the phase diagram. Various solution models used to describe the liquid and solid mixtures are discussed in the following sections, and the behavior of T % is presented. [Pg.160]

Figure 6. XY diagrams for sorption on 5 A zeolite at 250 K for various pressures. Gas pairs used were (left) CHt-Kr, (center) CHi-Q and P-Kr, and (right) P-Q. Mole fractions X and Y refer to the first component. Parameter is toted pressure... Figure 6. XY diagrams for sorption on 5 A zeolite at 250 K for various pressures. Gas pairs used were (left) CHt-Kr, (center) CHi-Q and P-Kr, and (right) P-Q. Mole fractions X and Y refer to the first component. Parameter is toted pressure...
The various curves of In xt considered as a function of 1/T are illustrated in Figure 10.4. At the melting point, indicated by T[, the mole fraction must be equal to unity and In xt must be zero. All curves showing the solubility of a component in some liquid phase must terminate at this point. We assume here that the melting point of the pure component is not too far removed from the experimental temperatures of interest. The slope for an ideal solution is given by... [Pg.271]

We must emphasize that these conditions are valid only when the standard state of a component is the same for both phases. We now choose a temperature, calculate values of Aju and Aju for each phase for various mole fractions and plot Aju against Aju for each phase. Two curves are obtained, one for each phase. The point of intersection of the curves gives the equilibrium values of Aju and Aju according to Equations (10.199) and (10.200). The calculation of x1 by the use of the left-hand side of Equation (10.198) and zl by the use of the right-hand side of Equation (10.198) is then relatively simple. If no intersection occurs, then no equilibrium between the two phases exists at the chosen temperature and pressure. The calculation must be repeated for each temperature. Activities could be used in place of Apu provided the same standard state for a component is used for both phases. [Pg.280]

When convienient we shall use the symbol y to indicate the mole fraction of vapour phase components in order to distinguish them from the mole fractions (x ) of liquid components. Examples of this convention can be seen in Frame 33 in Figure 33.1(a), in the extended treatment of binary liquid ideal solutions discussed in Frame 34 and also seen in Frame 36, Figure 36.2. The mole fractions will, however, have to be redefined at these various points in the context of the text. [Pg.93]

Percentages are similar except that they add up to 100 (instead of 1). Thus if we defined the various components in terms of their weight percent = % age of component 1 present in mixture, then we would only need to define this for (c — 1) of the components since weight % for component c = 100 - [sum of weight percentages of components 1 to (c — 1). The same is of course true when we use mole fractions. [Pg.189]

We can now proceed to calculate the number of degrees of freedom f for the assembly of phases. As discussed earlier, if the phases were all separate systems, p(c + 1) independent variables of state would have to be specified. However, as a result of equilibration among the phases one must now introduce the 2(p - 1) constraints of Eq. (2.1.6a) and (2.1.6b) to ensure uniformity in T and P. One must also take note of the c(p — 1) interrelations in Eq. (2.1.7) the equality among appropriate p s provides interrelations among the mole fractions of any given component in the various phases. The totality of constraints therefore is (c + 2)(p — 1). The number of degrees of freedom remaining is then... [Pg.194]

As we can see from relations such as Equation 8.2 (J = gjAcj = ACjlrj), the conductances or the resistances of the various parts of the pathway determine the drop in concentration across each component when the flux density is constant. Here we will apply this condition to a consideration of water vapor concentration and mole fraction in a leaf, and we will also consider water vapor partial pressures. In addition we will discuss the important effect of temperature on the water vapor content of air (also considered in Chapter 2, Section 2.4C). [Pg.385]


See other pages where Mole fraction, various component is mentioned: [Pg.349]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.92]   


SEARCH



Mole fraction

Moles mole fraction

© 2024 chempedia.info