Modulus of toughness

The critical strain energy release rate Gc is the energy equivalent to fracture toughness, first proposed by Griffith [Phil. Trans. Royal Soc., A221, 163 (1920)]. With an elastic modulus of , toughness and release rate are related by... 

Modolos of Toughness—Modulus of toughness is a mechanical property of a material that indicates the ability of the material to handle overloading before it fiactures. 

For materials chemistry applications, where the concentration term in Eq. (3) is not applicable, the effect of increasing K is harder to predict. The physical properties of the materials are also dependent on phase separation, glass transiticm temperature (Tg) and crystallinity [54], However, it has been demonstrated that the modulus of toughness and thermal responsiveness of supramolecular materials that incorporate either hydrogen bonded [55] or D-A interactions [56] are still dependent on the strength of the supramolecular interactions. 

Modulus of toughness (U ) Ability of a material to absorb energy in the plastic range before failure... 

A material s toughness is its ability to absorb energy in the plastic range. It is commonly measured by the modulus of toughness, U, that is, the amount of work stored per unit volume without causing rupture. As for the modulus of resilience, several mathematical approximations for the area under the true stress-strain curve can be used ... 

A number of metrics can be assessed from stress-strain behavior (Dowling 2007). Properties that are often evaluated include the modulus (initial modulus, or secant modulus evaluated to some specific strain), the yield stress, the yield strain, the ultimate strength, and the strain at break, as have been discussed in O Chap. 19. The area under the curve is known as the modulus of toughness, as this area has physical units of energy per unit volume, which are equivalent to force per unit area, the units of stress and modulus. 

One measure of the impact strength is the area under the stress (strain) curve for a tensile test conducted at a high strain rate. This measure is called the modulus of toughness. Obviously, a thermoplastic-type polymer with a relatively high elongation (ductility) will have a higher modulus of toughness than does a more brittle thermoset. 

The material in use as of the mid-1990s in these components is HDPE, a linear polymer which is tough, resiUent, ductile, wear resistant, and has low friction (see Olefin polymers, polyethylene). Polymers are prone to both creep and fatigue (stress) cracking. Moreover, HDPE has a modulus of elasticity that is only one-tenth that of the bone, thus it increases the level of stress transmitted to the cement, thereby increasing the potential for cement mantle failure. When the acetabular HDPE cup is backed by metal, it stiffens the HDPE cup. This results in function similar to that of natural subchondral bone. Metal backing has become standard on acetabular cups. 

Factors of hardness, elasticity, toughness, and cleavage are important in determining grindabihty. Grindabihty is related to modulus of elasticity and speed of sound in the material [Dahlhoff, Chem. Ing. Tech., 39(19), 1112-1116 (1967)]. 

There are, of course, many more ceramics available than those listed here alumina is available in many densities, silicon carbide in many qualities. As before, the structure-insensitive properties (density, modulus and melting point) depend little on quality -they do not vary by more than 10%. But the structure-sensitive properties (fracture toughness, modulus of rupture and some thermal properties including expansion) are much more variable. For these, it is essential to consult manufacturers data sheets or conduct your own tests. 

This is used most often in process plants. It is a tough, low-cost material with probably the widest range of chemical resistance of any of the low-cost plastics. On a volume basis, PVC is more favorable than polypropylene because the modulus of PVC is considerably higher than that of polypropylene, so it will form more rigid structures when used at the same thickness. On a weight basis it is not as favorable as PVC because it has a specific gravity of 1.4 compared with 0.92 for polypropylene. 

---