Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Total connectivity model

The basis for the above-mentioned model47) was provided by Maxwell s nonlinear model obtained in general form in Ref. 48). Flere the total strain was divided into irreversible strain and elastic strain X, Stress a and velocity of irreversible strain ep were determined from the elastic strain. In Ref. 48) a number of functions a (a.) and ep(X) were defined more specifically. Beside that, Maxwell s nonlinear models were connected in parallel. Note that in case of one Maxwell s element X = a23), but in case of several elements connected in parallel this is not true and a is determined from the solution of the respective problem. In case of the uniaxial extension the model of Ref.47) takes the following form ... [Pg.15]

The total connectivity model, used in the LP formulation, only considers combinations of CSTRs. The shrink-wrap method, in contrast, allows for combinations of both PFRs and CSTRs. [Pg.267]

A key difference between the complement method and the LP method is that the latter requires the solution of a linear program, whereas the former is a direct application of the CSTR attainability condition. In the LP approach, all points on the AR boundary are computed simultaneously—via the solution of a large linear program—in a single calculation step. In order for this result to be achieved, the candidate region boundary points must be expressed in terms of all other boundary points in space using a superstructure formulation, which is termed the total connectivity model. [Pg.270]

The Total Connectivity Model The connectivity model is a reactor superstructure formulation that attempts to approximate different reactor types using a network of small CSTRs. Combination of CSTRs in series and parallel allows for the approximation of different fundamental reactor types, specificdly ... [Pg.271]

Each CSTR used in the total connectivity model must be arranged in a flexible manner to allow for a wide range of configurations to be achieved. Inlet and outlet streams around a generalized CSTR building block used in the total connectivity model are shown in Figure 8.30(a). Several allowances are made in the total connectivity model including... [Pg.271]

Figure 8.29 The total connectivity model. Approximation of PFRs (a) and DSRs (b) using a number of CSTRs. KauchaU et al. (2002). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier. Figure 8.29 The total connectivity model. Approximation of PFRs (a) and DSRs (b) using a number of CSTRs. KauchaU et al. (2002). Reproduced with permission of Elsevier.
Concentration space is then discretized into N grid points C, where 1 < i < N. The corresponding rate vector evaluated at C, r, = r(C,) may then also be determined given the system kinetics. The total connectivity model assumes that a CSTR operates at each grid point. When a mass balance around the ith CSTR is performed, the following system of equations, considered in conjunction with Figure 8.30(a), are generated ... [Pg.271]

Figure 8.30 The total connectivity model (a) Streams around the fth CSTR in the total connectivity model and (b) overview of the total... Figure 8.30 The total connectivity model (a) Streams around the fth CSTR in the total connectivity model and (b) overview of the total...
Since computation of the AR is carried out via many small CSTRs in the total connectivity model, interpretation of the associated optimal reactor structure is not clear using the method. This is a trait observed for many superstructure methods. Nevertheless, candidate ARs for systems with highly nonlinear kinetics may be found with this approach since the method does not solve for exit concentrations, but rather volumes and flow rates. [Pg.276]

Introduction In contrast to the total connectivity model, where a superstmcture representation is formulated specifically for the determination of the AR, the IDEAS framework (Burri et al., 2002) caters to the solution of more generalized reactor network synthesis problems. Candidate AR construction is one of many outputs that the IDEAS framework is capable of performing. [Pg.276]

The surface modeling is connected with the basic concepts, introduced by Tasker [772] in a discussion of the stabihty of surfaces of ionic or partly ionic crystals. According to classical electrostatic criteria, the stabihty of a compound surface depends on the characteristics of the charge distribution in the structural unit that repeats itself in the direction perpendicular to the surface. The surface can be studied by considering the crystal as a stack of atomic planes. Each plane consists of sublattices of nonequivalent atoms, a sum over each sublattice on each plane gives the total electrostatic potential. For perpendicular distances z greater than a few interionic spacings, the contribution from a planar sublattice reduces to the particularly simple form... [Pg.466]

FIGURE 8.1 Model of a central recirculating system used for calculating the connection between contaminant concentrations, airflow rates, contaminant source strength, q, and air cleaner efficiency, rj. Cj p is the concentration in the supply (outside) air, c is the concentration in the room, c is the concentration in the returned air, (JaMot the total flow rate through the room, ic is the ratio between recirculated airflow rate and total air flow rate, T is the time constant for the room, and V is the room volume. [Pg.614]

FIG. 13 Herringbone order parameter and total energy for N2 (X model with Steele s corrugation). Quantum simulation, full line classical simulation, dotted line quasiharmonic theory, dashed line Feynman-Hibbs simulation, triangles. The lines are linear connections of the data. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. 95, Fig. 4. 1993, American Physical Society.)... [Pg.116]

Although many interface models have been given so far, they are too qualitative and we can hardly connect them to the mechanics and mechanism of carbon black reinforcement of rubbers. On the other hand, many kinds of theories have also been proposed to explain the phenomena, but most of them deal only with a part of the phenomena and they could not totally answer the above four questions. The author has proposed a new interface model and theory to understand the mechanics and mechanism of carbon black reinforcement of rubbers based on the finite element method (FEM) stress analysis of the filled system, in journals and a book. In the new model and theory, the importance of carbon gel (bound rubber) in carbon black reinforcement of rubbers is emphasized repeatedly. Actually, it is not too much to say that the existence of bound rubber and its changeable and deformable characters depending on the magnitude of extension are the essence of carbon black reinforcement of rubbers. [Pg.519]

All of the studies published so far have been aiming at the reconstruction of the total electron density in the crystal by redistribution of all electrons, under the constraints imposed by the MaxEnt requirement and the experimental data. After the acceptance of this paper, the authors became aware of valence-only MaxEnt reconstructions contained in the doctoral thesis of Garry Smith [58], The authors usually invoke the MaxEnt principle of Jaynes [23-26], although the underlying connection with the structural model, known under the name of random scatterer model, is seldom explicitly mentioned. [Pg.14]

The development of the methods described in Section 9.2 was an important step in modeling polarization because it led to accurate calculations of molecular polarizability tensors. The most serious issue with those methods is known as the polarization catastrophe since they are unable to reproduce the substantial decrease of the total dipole moment at distances close to contact as obtained from ab initio calculations. As noted by Applequist et al. [49], and Thole [50], a property of the unmodified point dipole is that it may originate infinite polarization by the cooperative interaction of the two induced dipoles in the direction of the line connecting the two. The mathematical origins of such singularities are made more evident by considering a simple system consisting of two atoms (A and B) with isotropic polarizabilities, aA and c b. The molecular polarizability, has two components, one parallel and one perpendicular to the bond axis between A and B,... [Pg.232]

Noncondensable gases leaving the condensation vessels were depressurized (by means of an electronic back-pressure, Brooks Instrument model 5866), totalized (by means of an on-line flow gas meter, Ritter model TG05-5), and periodically analyzed with an on-line GC (Hewlett-Packard model 6890) equipped with three columns and two detectors for the analysis of Cj-C10 hydrocarbons (A1203 plot capillary column connected to a flame ionization detector), H2, CH4,... [Pg.296]

Young In any calculation you allow for a number of variables in terms of trying to model the system of action potential propagation. We know that action potentials have to travel within a fasciculus, which is a macroscopic 1—2 mm connective tissue grouping of bundles. Those do not follow a very tortuous route, at the most they wind once or twice over 30 cm, but not much larger than that. The best simulation that s been done using action potential alone used around nine parameters and was totally unrealistic. I probably didn t point it out but the dashed line that overlayed my clinical contraction was where I actually assumed a 350 /tm size bundle. I assumed an intracellular Ca2+ wave and cell activity for 20 s, and I was able to fit it except for the foot at the end (Young 1997). [Pg.187]


See other pages where Total connectivity model is mentioned: [Pg.294]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.12]   


SEARCH



Connectivity modeling

© 2024 chempedia.info