Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Approximation difference

The application of density functional theory to isolated, organic molecules is still in relative infancy compared with the use of Hartree-Fock methods. There continues to be a steady stream of publications designed to assess the performance of the various approaches to DFT. As we have discussed there is a plethora of ways in which density functional theory can be implemented with different functional forms for the basis set (Gaussians, Slater type orbitals, or numerical), different expressions for the exchange and correlation contributions within the local density approximation, different expressions for the gradient corrections and different ways to solve the Kohn-Sham equations to achieve self-consistency. This contrasts with the situation for Hartree-Fock calculations, wlrich mostly use one of a series of tried and tested Gaussian basis sets and where there is a substantial body of literature to help choose the most appropriate method for incorporating post-Hartree-Fock methods, should that be desired. [Pg.157]

Fig. 2. (a) Raw 300 MHz proton spectrum of a mixture of acetone and ethanol in deuteri-ochloroform (b) after reference deconvolution using the acetone signal as reference and an ideal lineshape of a 1 Hz wide Lorentzian and (c) after reference deconvolution with an ideal lineshape characterized by a negative Lorentzian width of 0.1 Hz and a Gaussian width of 0.4 Hz. The 0.1 Hz Lorentzian term represents the approximate difference in natural linewidth between the ethanol and acetone signals, and is responsible for the wings on... [Pg.312]

After the crystal structure of the compound has been solved, or deduced, from the X-ray data, the initial parameters (atomic positions, bond lengths, and bond angles) are only approximate and have to be improved. The usual method employed is that of least-squares refinement, although electron-density difference-maps and trial-and-error procedures are also used. Electron-density difference-maps give the approximate difference between the actual structure and the trial structure. [Pg.55]

Several valence-bond (VB) treatments of heterocyclic compounds were reported in the thirties and forties.1, 2 The known difficulty in applying the VB method to complicated molecules has made an overwhelming majority of authors use the molecular orbital (MO) method. In most cases its simplest version, the naive MO LCAO method, has been used. This approximation differs from the well-known Hiickel... [Pg.70]

In my preliminary definition, I mentioned the exterior purpose, and the use of the words model and simulation speaks to the respective purposes of conceptual understanding and actual approximation. Different models may be appropriate to the same purpose, and function best in different regions of parameter space. [See J (pp. 18-22) for a further discussion of this point.]... [Pg.21]

It can be seen that the function obtained as a result of the stepwise approximation differs to a comparatively small extent from the precise function. Nevertheless, in some cases even this small difference can result in considerable errors in describing the process kinetics, especially at short observation times. [Pg.124]

According to the quasi-chemical approximation, different pairs are treated as being independent, hence the probability that, for example, n particles of A and m particles of B are localized near the particle A, is... [Pg.69]

A similar result was expected in Ref. 221 for cps(c>) = 1 — cp(cr), but the obtained difference between the recombination rates in the opposite limits was half as much kc for the slowest conversion and kj2 for the fastest one. This is because the isotropic Ag mechanism determining the spin conversion in Ref. 221 mixes the singlet with the 7b) sublevel only. In the rate approximation one can easily get the same, assuming that the spin transitions between the singlet and triplet RIPs occurs with equal rates in the forward and backward directions as in Eq. (3.585b). However, the transition from the slow to the fast conversion limit resulting from the rate approximation differs somehow from that obtained with the Hamiltonian approach in Ref. 221. [Pg.317]

Both of these approximations differ from Eq. 5.15 in the value of the coefficient and in the value of the exponent of the aspect ratio (Ve versus Vi). Spurny et al. (1978) reported experimental measurements of asbestos fiber aerodynamic diameters which indicate a range of exponential values of 0.116 to 0.171 with a coefficient of about 1.34. However, even if the details are still not clear, it is clear that for fibers the... [Pg.49]

Clearly there are a number of interesting trends that are apparent here and that require explanation. Table I lists the approximate differences between the primary and the secondary E-X bond lengths (A) for the element trihalides EX3 common superscripts reflect isomorphous (or nearly so) structures for which a comparison is particularly appropriate. [Pg.236]

Approximate Differences (to the Nearest 0.05 A) between the Lengths of the Primary and Secondary E—X Bonds (A) for the Element Trihalides EX3 ... [Pg.237]

The free energy of the solution of chains in the second virial approximation differs from the free energy of the corresponding solution of disconnected segments (Eq. (2.3)) only in two respects. [Pg.72]

Applying ab initio quantum-chemical methods and density functional theory in the local density approximation, different (BH) spherical clusters for n — 12,20,32,42 and 92 have been investigated. Most of the clusters show nearly icosahedral symmetry. The hydrogen atoms are bonded to the spherical surface as prickles. The relative stability of the spheres measured as the binding energy per molecule has been analyzed. All the clusters studied are very stable, and the spherical (BH)32 cluster Seems to be the most stable structure. The effect of the hydrogen atoms is to increase the stability of the bare boron clusters. [Pg.493]

The partial-equilibrium approximation differs from the steady-state approximation in that it refers to a particular reaction instead of to a particular species. The mechanism must include the forward and backward steps of any reaction that maintains partial equilibrium, and the approximation for a reaction k is then expressed by setting = 0 in equation (11). It is not always proper to conclude from this that when equations (6), (10), and (11) are employed in equation (14), the terms may be set equal to zero for each k that maintains partial equilibrium partial equilibria occur when the forward and backward rates are both large, and a small fractional difference of these two large quantities may contribute significantly to dcjdt. The criterion for validity of the approximation is that be small compared with the forward or backward rate. [Pg.567]

Fig. 5. Estimated approximate differences between the COj partial pressure in near surface ocean waters in the overlying atmosphere,... [Pg.413]

It is difficult to calculate the likelihood of the data for most pharmacokinetic models because of the nonlinear dependence of the observations on the random parameters rj,- and, possibly, Sy. To deal with these problems, several approximate methods have been proposed. These methods, apart from the approximation, differ widely in their representation of the probability distribution of interindividual random effects. [Pg.2951]

You will sometimes see other pKa values cited for certain compounds, especially alkanes. The pKa of a compound changes dramatically with solvent, and it also depends on the temperature and the method of measurement. Approximate differences between acidities matter when organic reaction mechanisms are drawn, so the values given here suffice for the purposes of this text. For a more detailed discussion of acidity, see any physical organic chemistry textbook. [Pg.17]


See other pages where Approximation difference is mentioned: [Pg.264]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.1409]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.38]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.56 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.56 ]




SEARCH



Appendix 8.2 Finite Difference Approximations

Approximation by the Use of Difference Equations

Approximation techniques finite differences

Convergence order finite difference approximations

Crank—Nicholson finite difference approximation

Definitions and Approximations Associated with Different Types of Potential Energy Curves

Derivative, central-difference form approximation

Difference approximation of elementary differential operators

Difference approximation, Crank-Nicholson

Difference equations approximating

Difference equations approximating wave equation

Different IPM Approximations

Error of the difference approximation

Finite difference approximation of the boundary-value problem

Finite difference approximations

Fukui function finite difference approximations

The Finite Difference Approximation

Truncation error, finite difference approximation

Uniform approximation finite difference schemes

© 2024 chempedia.info