Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model catalysts structural sensitivity

Yoshihara J, Campbell CT. Methanol synthesis and reverse water-gas shift kinetics over Cu(110) model catalysts structural sensitivity. J Catal. 1996 161 (2) 776—82. [Pg.436]

The systematic use of classical catalytic kinetics is always a useful approach in modeling (Boudart 1986). Even if these models do not reflect the true mechanism in the case of structure-sensitive catalysts, they are a formally correct representation of the observed facts. As Boudart sees it in the case of structure-insensitive reactions, it can also be the real thing. [Pg.121]

Attempts to determine how the activity of the catalyst (or the selectivity which is, in a rough approximation, the ratio of reaction rates) depends upon the metal particle size have been undertaken for many decades. In 1962, one of the most important figures in catalysis research, M. Boudart, proposed a definition for structure sensitivity [4,5]. A heterogeneously catalyzed reaction is considered to be structure sensitive if its rate, referred to the number of active sites and, thus, expressed as turnover-frequency (TOF), depends on the particle size of the active component or a specific crystallographic orientation of the exposed catalyst surface. Boudart later expanded this model proposing that structure sensitivity is related to the number of (metal surface) atoms to which a crucial reaction intermediate is bound [6]. [Pg.167]

Besides electronic effects, structure sensitivity phenomena can be understood on the basis of geometric effects. The shape of (metal) nanoparticles is determined by the minimization of the particles free surface energy. According to Wulffs law, this requirement is met if (on condition of thermodynamic equilibrium) for all surfaces that delimit the (crystalline) particle, the ratio between their corresponding energies cr, and their distance to the particle center hi is constant [153]. In (non-model) catalysts, the particles real structure however is furthermore determined by the interaction with the support [154] and by the formation of defects for which Figure 14 shows an example. [Pg.177]

Asymmetric diarylmethanes, hydrogenolytic behaviors, 29 229-270, 247-252 catalytic hydrogenolysis, 29 243-258 kinetics and scheme, 29 252-258 M0O3-AI2O3 catalyst, 29 259-269 relative reactivity, 29 255-257 schematic model, 29 254 Asymmetric hydrogenations, 42 490-491 Asymmetric synthesis, 25 82, 83 examples of, 25 82 Asymmetry factor, 42 123-124 Atom-by-species matrix, 32 302-303, 318-319 Atomic absorption, 27 317 Atomic catalytic activities of sites, 34 183 Atomic displacements, induced by adsorption, 21 212, 213 Atomic rate or reaction definition, 36 72-73 structure sensitivity and, 36 86-87 Atomic species, see also specific elements adsorbed... [Pg.51]

For example, it is believed that defects in the crystal structure produce highly energetic and active sites for catalytic reactions. This may be true but the more crystalline the catalytic site the lower is the number of surface atoms and the lower is its catalytic surface area. All this being said there are reactions that favor certain catalyst crystalline sizes and are said to be structure sensitive. The above discussion points to the mystery of catalysis. The goal of finding a universal model describing the nature of the active catalytic site still eludes us today and will undoubtedly be the subject of fundamental research for years to come. [Pg.281]

These difficulties have stimulated the development of defined model catalysts better suited for fundamental studies (Fig. 15.2). Single crystals are the most well-defined model systems, and studies of their structure and interaction with gas molecules have explained the elementary steps of catalytic reactions, including surface relaxation/reconstruction, adsorbate bonding, structure sensitivity, defect reactivity, surface dynamics, etc. [2, 5-7]. Single crystals were also modified by overlayers of oxides ( inverse catalysts ) [8], metals, alkali, and carbon (Fig. 15.2). However, macroscopic (cm size) single crystals cannot mimic catalyst properties that are related to nanosized metal particles. The structural difference between a single-crystal surface and supported metal nanoparticles ( 1-10 nm in diameter) is typically referred to as a materials gap. Provided that nanoparticles exhibit only low Miller index facets (such as the cuboctahedral particles in Fig. 15.1 and 15.2), and assuming that the support material is inert, one could assume that the catalytic properties of a... [Pg.320]

One of the key issues of supported model catalysts is to prepare collection of metal particles having a well-defined morphology. Indeed, if a catalytic reaction is structure-sensitive [54], it will depend on the nature of the facets present on the particles. Moreover, the presence of edges, the proportion of which is increasing rapidly below about 5 nm, can affect the reactivity by their intrinsic low coordination and also by their role as boundary between the different facets. In this section I first discuss the theoretical predictions of the shape of small particles and clusters, then I briefly describe the available experimental techniques to study the morphology, and finally I discuss from selected examples how it is possible to understand and control the morphology of supported model catalysts. [Pg.267]

In this chapter we review studies, primarily from our laboratory, of Pt and Pt-bimetallic nanoparticle electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and the electrochemical oxidation of H2 (HOR) and H2/CO mixtures in aqueous electrolytes at 274—333 K. We focus on the study of both the structure sensitivity of the reactions as gleaned from studies of the bulk (bi) metallic surfaces and the resultant crystallite size effect expected or observed when the catalyst is of nanoscale dimension. Physical characterization of the nanoparticles by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) techniques is shown to be an essential tool for these studies. Comparison with well-characterized model surfaces have revealed only a few nanoparticle anomalies, although the number of bimetallics... [Pg.334]


See other pages where Model catalysts structural sensitivity is mentioned: [Pg.555]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.347]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 , Pg.18 , Pg.19 , Pg.20 , Pg.21 , Pg.22 , Pg.23 , Pg.24 , Pg.25 , Pg.26 , Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Catalyst modelling

Catalysts structured

Catalysts, structures

Model catalyst

Model sensitivity

Modelling sensitivities

Structure sensitivity

Structure-sensitive sensitivity

© 2024 chempedia.info