Model building data interpretation

To illustrate how the model building and interpreting of an PLSR calibration model proceeds, the experiment will be worked through step by step, and various plots will be used to explain how the data can be analyzed and interpreted. 

The vertices are connected with hues indicating information flow. Measurements from the plant flow to plant data, where raw measurements are converted to typical engineering units. The plant data information flows via reconciliation, rec tification, and interpretation to the plant model. The results of the model (i.e., troubleshooting, model building, or parameter estimation) are then used to improve plant operation through remedial action, control, and design. 

Measurement Selection The identification of which measurements to make is an often overlooked aspect of plant-performance analysis. The end use of the data interpretation must be understood (i.e., the purpose for which the data, the parameters, or the resultant model will be used). For example, building a mathematical model of the process to explore other regions of operation is an end use. Another is to use the data to troubleshoot an operating problem. The level of data accuracy, the amount of data, and the sophistication of the interpretation depends upon the accuracy with which the result of the analysis needs to oe known. Daily measurements to a great extent and special plant measurements to a lesser extent are rarelv planned with the end use in mind. The result is typically too little data of too low accuracy or an inordinate amount with the resultant misuse in resources. 

Genetics and model building provide a framework for the interpretation of structural data, but they cannot reliably be used to predict the details of the stereochemistry of specific interactions within or between molecules. 

Building a model involves subjective interpretation of the data... 

Model building is an interpretation of the currently available electron density. Refinement is the adjustment of the built model to fit better to the experimental data. A crucial point here is that a density map computed from the refined model is generally better than the map obtained from the same model before the refinement. This then allows for an even better model to be built. Thus, refinement is needed to improve the outcome of model building by generating a better electron density map and model building is needed to provide a model in the first place and to provide stereochemical restraints for the subsequent refinement to proceed smoothly. This viewpoint merges these two steps into one model optimization process. 

Reducing the dimensionality of the descriptor space not only facilitates model building with molecular descriptors but also makes data visualization and identification of key variables in various models possible. Notice that while a low dimension mathematically simplifies a problem such as model development or data visualization, it is usually more difficult to correlate trends directly with physical descriptors, and hence the data become less interpretable, after the dimension transformation. Trends directly linked with physical descriptors provide simple guidance for molecular modifications during potency/property optimizations. 

In crystal chemistry it is important to derive packing models for interpreting experimental data and for postulating new possible structures [l-4. The prediction of new materials and their properties, useful for particular applications, can lead to the planning of new syntheses. Moreover, the differences between the model and the experimentally determined structure can show the limitations of the theory used to build the model, while the interpretation of these differences gives a better understanding of the chemical and physical properties of the material studied. 

Model building and current statistical methods applied to interpretation of rate data are presented in... 

Environmental data come in a wide variety and what is expected from them also varies a lot. This makes data pretreatment, model building and model interpretation very dependent on background knowledge, more than, e.g., in fluorescence or MSPC data where general goals are formulated more easily. 

As described in Chapter 5, section 5.4, the cylinder test consists of detonating a cylinder of explosive confined by copper and measuring the velocity of the expanding copper wall until it fractures. The cylinder test is commonly used to evaluate explosive performance using the JWL fitting form. The numerical model required to interpret cylinder wall expansion experiments must include a realistic description of build-up of detonation, Forest Fire burn and resulting wave curvature. That first became possible with the development of the NOBEL code. All previous calibrations of the JWL equation of state from cylinder test expansion data used explosive models without the essential detonation build-up to and of detonation. 

Given the complex nature of NIR and Raman spectra, it is very difficult to provide ad-hoc quantitative interpretation of spectral data. For this reason, careful building and validation of calibration models are of fundamental importance prior to the development of a useful apphcation of modem spectroscopic technology. Therefore, model building and calibration constitute a very important issue for those interested in monitoring and controlling chemical processes with the help of spectroscopic methods. 

The standard method for multivariate data of type 2a (Figure 2, X-matrix and one j -variable) is multiple linear regression (MLR), also called ordinary least squares regression (OLS). Only a few basic principles can be summarized here. The aim of data interpretation in this case is to build a linear model for the prediction of a response y from the independent variables (regressors, features) X, X2... Xp as given in equation (17) ... 

---