Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mixture-related factors, method

The selected factors are either mixture-related, quantitative (continuous), or qualitative (discrete).A mixture-related factor is, for instance, the fraction organic solvent in the buffer system. Examples of quantitative factors are the electrolyte concentration, the buffer pH, the capillary temperature, and the voltage, and of qualitative factors the manufacturer or the batch number of a reagent, solvent, or capillary. Sample concentration (see Table 1) is a factor sometimes included. However, the aim of the method tested is to determine this concentration through the measured signal, from a calibration procedure. Thus, one evaluates the influence of the sample concentration on the sample concentration, which we do not consider a good idea. [Pg.189]

In robustness tests, usually the factors are examined at two extreme levels.For mixture-related and quantitative factors, these levels usually are chosen symmetrically around the nominal. The range between the extreme levels is selected so that it represents the variability that can occur when transferring the method.However, specifications to estimate such variability are not given in the ICH guidelines. Often the levels are chosen based on personal experience, knowledge, or intuition. Some define the extreme levels as nominal level +x%. However, this relative variation in factor levels is not an appropriate approach, since the absolute variation then depends on the value of the nominal level. Another possibility is to define the levels based on the precision or the uncertainty, with which... [Pg.190]

Many chemical substances or mixtures exert a whole spectrum of activities, ranging from beneficial to neutral to lethal. Their effect depends not only on the quantity of the substance to which an organism is exposed, but also on the species and size of the organism, its nutritional status, the method of exposure, and a number of other related factors. [Pg.119]

The whey produced during cheese and casein manufacturing contains approximately 20% of all milk proteins. It represents a rich and varied mixture of secreted proteins with wide-ranging chemical, physical and functional properties (Smithers et al., 1996). Due to their beneficial functional properties, whey proteins are used as ingredients in many industrial food products (Cheftel and Lorient, 1982). According to Kinsella and Whitehead (1989), functional properties of foods can be explained by the relation of the intrinsic properties of the proteins (amino acid composition and disposition, flexibility, net charge, molecular size, conformation, hydrophobicity, etc.), and various extrinsic factors (method of preparation and storage, temperature, pH, modification process, etc.). [Pg.30]

Optimum conditions. However, modeling a qualitative factor has no meaning because only discrete levels are possible and no intermediate values occur. Therefore, only mixture-related and quantitative factors are examined in the optimization step. Sequential optimization methods select successive experiments in the factor domain, which implies that again only mixture-related and quantitative factors can be examined. [Pg.22]

Data matrices (two-way data). Electrophoretic data resulting from multiway detectors, such as in CE-DAD and CE-MS techniques, can be arranged in a table of values or a data matrix. Data are structured over the two domains of measurement, in which each column corresponds to a wavelength (or m/q ratio) and each row corresponds to a time point. Two-way data can be exploited for studies of peak purity and mixture resolution using curve resolution and related factor analysis methods. [Pg.204]

The transfer hydrogenation methods described above are sufficient to carry out laboratory-scale studies, but it is unlikely that a direct scale-up of these processes would result in identical yields and selectivities. This is because the reaction mixtures are biphasic liquid, gas. The gas which is distilled off is acetone from the IPA system, and carbon dioxide from the TEAF system. The rate of gas disengagement is related to the superficial surface area. As the process is scaled-up, or the height of the liquid increases, the ratio of surface area to volume decreases. In order to improve de-gassing, parameters such as stirring rates, reactor design and temperature are important, and these will be discussed along with other factors found important in process scale-up. [Pg.1236]

Several other empirical relations for diffusion coefficients have been suggested Olson and Walton (01) have devised a means for estimating diffusion coefficients of organic liquids in water solution from surface-tension measurements. Hill (H5) has proposed a method based on Andrade s theory of liquids which allows for the concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient in a binary liquid mixture. The formula of Arnold (A2, T6, p. 102) does not seem generally useful inasmuch as it contains two constants ( abnormality factors ) characteristic of the solute and of the solvent. [Pg.198]

A study of benzocyclobutene polymerization kinetics and thermodynamics by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) methods has also been reported in the literature [1]. This study examined a series of benzocyclobutene monomers containing one or two benzocyclobutene groups per molecule, both with and without reactive unsaturation. The study provided a measurement of the thermodynamics of the reaction between two benzocyclobutene groups and compared it with the thermodynamics of the reaction of a benzocyclobutene with a reactive double bond (Diels-Alder reaction). Differential scanning calorimetry was chosen for this work since it allowed for the study of the reaction mixture throughout its entire polymerization and not just prior to or after its gel point. The monomers used in this study are shown in Table 3. The polymerization exotherms were analyzed by the method of Borchardt and Daniels to obtain the reaction order n, the Arrhenius activation energy Ea and the pre-exponential factor log Z. Tables 4 and 5 show the results of these measurements and related calculations. [Pg.11]

The preceding discussion assumed a pure liquid was used for the measurement. Most molecules of interest, however, are not in the liquid state at room temperature. In this case it is common to dissolve the compound in an appropriate solvent and conduct the measurement. Contributions to the second harmonic signal are therefore obtained from both the solvent and solute. Since r and the local field factors that are related to e and n, (the dielectric constant and refractive index respectively) are concentration dependent, the determination of p for mixtures is not straightforward. Singer and Garito (15) have developed methods for obtaining r0, eQ, and nQ, the values of the above quantities at infinite dilution, from which accurate values for p can be obtained in most cases. [Pg.49]

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION, COMMITTEE ON THE CHALLENGES of MODERN SOCIETY. International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEF) method of risk assessment for complex mixtures of dioxins and related compounds. Pilot study on international information exchange on dioxins and related compounds . CCMS Report Number 176, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., 1988. [Pg.189]

Window diagrams and related methods may in principle be applied to optimization problems in more than one dimension. The main difference compared with one-parameter problems is that graphical procedures become much more difficult and that the role of the computer becomes more and more important. Deming et al. [558,559] have applied the window diagram method to the simultaneous optimization of two parameters in RPLC. The volume fraction of methanol and the concentration of ion-pairing reagent (1-octane sulfonic acid) were considered for the optimization of a mixture of 2,6-disubstituted anilines [558]. A five-parameter model equation was used to describe the retention surface for each solute. Data were recorded according to a three-level, two-factor experimental... [Pg.209]

NATO/CCMS (1988). In International Toxicity Equivalency Factors (I-TEF) Method of Risk Assessment for Complex Mixtures of Dioxin and Related Compounds, NATO, Brussels, Report no.176. [Pg.332]

There are a number of methods closely related to factor analysis and some of these exploit its capability of being able to abstract from the data the number of independent factors which are operating. This is clearly of value for elucidating complex systems, for spectral analysis of mixtures and may be employed for pattern recognition analysis. [Pg.23]

In the study of Teuschler et al. (2000), the models for analyzing the data were selected beforehand, and it was also decided to only focus on environmentally relevant mixtures. The authors indicated that these 2 factors were decisive for choosing the concentration levels to test. The concentration levels were not selected in relation to a specific endpoint, using the toxic unit approach. This may have been avoided because several different hepatotoxic endpoints have been measured simultaneously. The concentrations tested enabled the use of 3 types of models a multiple regression CA model, the interaction-based HI, and the proportional-response addition method. A major problem with mixture toxicity research in general is the... [Pg.151]

Recently, Riviere and Brooks (2007) published a method to improve the prediction of dermal absorption of compounds dosed in complex chemical mixtures. The method predicts dermal absorption or penetration of topically applied compounds by developing quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models based on linear free energy relations (LFERs). The QSPR equations are used to describe individual compound penetration based on the molecular descriptors for the compound, and these are modified by a mixture factor (MF), which accounts for the physical-chemical properties of the vehicle and mixture components. Principal components analysis is used to calculate the MF based on percentage composition of the vehicle and mixture components and physical-chemical properties. [Pg.203]


See other pages where Mixture-related factors, method is mentioned: [Pg.21]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.1053]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.2255]    [Pg.2342]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.69]   


SEARCH



Method development mixture-related factors

Mixture factor

Relation factors

© 2024 chempedia.info