Mixing reactor system

Various laboratory reactors have been described in the literature [3, 11-13]. The most simple one is the packed bed tubular reactor where an amount of catalyst is held between plugs of quartz wool or wire mesh screens which the reactants pass through, preferably in plug flow . For low conversions this reactor is operated in the differential mode, for high conversions over the catalyst bed in the integral mode. By recirculation of the reactor exit flow one can approach a well mixed reactor system, the continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR). This can be done either externally or internally [11, 12]. Without inlet and outlet feed, this reactor becomes a batch reactor, where the composition changes as a function of time (transient operation), in contrast with the steady state operation of the continuous flow reactors. 

Plug flow-perfectly mixed reactor systems (chapter 4.4). 

PLUG FLOW-PERFECTLY MIXED REACTOR SYSTEMS... 

A fixed-bed reactor device was used otherwise, as shown in Figure 1. The catalyst bed (1) contained 70 or 140 g of catalyst beads. Phenol solution was circulated through the bed and an oxygen saturation column (2) from a reservoir (3) of 2 1 in volume, and a circulation rate of 120 1/hr was used to obtain practically gradient-free conditions in the whole reactor system. This "well mixed reactor" system could be used in a discontimousor a con-tiruousfashion, using another reservoir (6) and an overflow channel reservoir into (8) in the latter case. A Zeiss PM QII UV photometer (4) was connected to the reactor to monitor phenol concentration at A= 270 nm. 

The kinetic expressions of Section 4.4.2 are substituted into overall material and energy balances to construct a model to represent an FRP process. For a well-mixed reactor system, Eqs. (84)-(89) comprise the general system of equations for homopolymerization. 

Multiple reactions in parallel producing byproducts. Consider again the system of parallel reactions from Eqs. (2.16) and (2.17). A batch or plug-flow reactor maintains higher average concentrations of feed (Cfeed) than a continuous well-mixed reactor, in which the incoming feed is instantly diluted by the PRODUCT and... 

Wet Oxidation Reactor Design. Several types of reactor designs have been employed for wet oxidation processes. Zimpro, the largest manufacturer of wet oxidation systems, typically uses a tower reactor system. The reactor is a bubble tower where air is introduced at the bottom to achieve plug flow with controlled back-mixing. Residence time is typically under one hour. A horizontal, stirred tank reactor system, known as the Wetox process, was initially developed by Barber-Cohnan, and is also offered by Zimpro. 

Fluidized-bed reactor systems put other unique stresses on the VPO catalyst system. The mixing action inside the reactor creates an environment that is too harsh for the mechanical strength of a vanadium phosphoms oxide catalyst, and thus requires that the catalyst be attrition resistant (121,140,141). To achieve this goal, vanadium phosphoms oxide is usually spray dried with coUoidal siUca [7631-86-9] or polysiUcic acid [1343-98-2]. Vanadium phosphoms oxide catalysts made with coUoidal sUica are reported to have a loss of selectivity, while no loss in selectivity is reported for catalysts spray dried with polysUicic acid (140). 

Bubble columns in series have been used to establish the same effective mix of plug-flow and back-mixing behavior required for Hquid-phase oxidation of cyclohexane, as obtained with staged reactors in series. WeU-mixed behavior has been established with both Hquid and air recycle. The choice of one bubble column reactor was motivated by the need to minimize sticky by-products that accumulated on the walls (93). Here, high air rate also increased conversion by eliminating reaction water from the reactor, thus illustrating that the choice of a reactor system need not always be based on compromise, and solutions to production and maintenance problems are complementary. Unlike the Hquid in most bubble columns, Hquid in this reactor was intentionally weU mixed. 

Consider a well-mixed batch reactor with a key reactant A, during time t to time t -i- 6t, where 6t is very small. For a well-mixed batch system, assume the following ... 

The reaction takes place at low temperature (40-60 °C), without any solvent, in two (or more, up to four) well-mixed reactors in series. The pressure is sufficient to maintain the reactants in the liquid phase (no gas phase). Mixing and heat removal are ensured by an external circulation loop. The two components of the catalytic system are injected separately into this reaction loop with precise flow control. The residence time could be between 5 and 10 hours. At the output of the reaction section, the effluent containing the catalyst is chemically neutralized and the catalyst residue is separated from the products by aqueous washing. The catalyst components are not recycled. Unconverted olefin and inert hydrocarbons are separated from the octenes by distillation columns. The catalytic system is sensitive to impurities that can coordinate strongly to the nickel metal center or can react with the alkylaluminium derivative (polyunsaturated hydrocarbons and polar compounds such as water). 

Part (c) in Example 15.15 illustrates an interesting point. It may not be possible to achieve maximum mixedness in a particular physical system. Two tanks in series—even though they are perfectly mixed individually—cannot achieve the maximum mixedness limit that is possible with the residence time distribution of two tanks in series. There exists a reactor (albeit semi-hypothetical) that has the same residence time distribution but that gives lower conversion for a second-order reaction than two perfectly mixed CSTRs in series. The next section describes such a reactor. When the physical configuration is known, as in part (c) above, it may provide a closer bound on conversion than provided by the maximum mixed reactor described in the next section. 

Model predictions are caipared with experimental data In the case of the ternary system acrylonitrlle-styrene-methyl methacrylate. Ihe experimental runs have been performed with the same recipe, but monomer feed composition. A glass, thermostat ted, well mixed reactor, equipped with an anchor stirrer and four baffles, has been used. The reactor operates under nitrogen atmosphere and a standard degassing procedure is performed Just before each reaction. The same operating conditions have been maintained in all runs tenperature = 50°C, pressure = 1 atm, stirring speed = 500 rpm, initiator (KgSgOg) 0. 395 gr, enulsifier (SLS) r 2.0 gr, deionized water = 600 gr, total amount of monomers = 100 gr. 

The experimental results in Fig. 27 show the influence of the reactor system (see Fig. 28) on the disintegration of enzyme activity. It was found that the low-stress bladed impeller results in less activity loss than the propeller stirrer which causes much higher maximum energy dissipation ,. The gentle motion the blade impeller produces means that stress is so low that its disadvantage of worse micro mixing in NaOH (in comparison with the propeller) is more than compensated. 

Resident Time Distribution (RTD) is widely employed in the chemical engineering industry, as an analytical tool for characterizing flow dynamics within reactor vessels. RTD provides a quantitative measure of the back-mixing with in a reactor system [2]. However the cost and time involved in building and operating a pilot- or full scale reactor for RTD analysis can be economically prohibitive. As such we have implemented a numerical RTD technique through the FLUENT (ver. 6.1) commercial CFD package. 

The principle of the perfectly-mixed stirred tank has been discussed previously in Sec. 1.2.2, and this provides essential building block for modelling applications. In this section, the concept is applied to tank type reactor systems and stagewise mass transfer applications, such that the resulting model equations often appear in the form of linked sets of first-order difference differential equations. Solution by digital simulation works well for small problems, in which the number of equations are relatively small and where the problem is not compounded by stiffness or by the need for iterative procedures. For these reasons, the dynamic modelling of the continuous distillation columns in this section is intended only as a demonstration of method, rather than as a realistic attempt at solution. For the solution of complex distillation problems, the reader is referred to commercial dynamic simulation packages. 

It is well known that dense ceramic membranes made of the mixture of ionic and electron conductors are permeable to oxygen at elevated temperatures. For example, perovskite-type oxides (e.g., La-Sr-Fe-Co, Sr-Fe-Co, and Ba-Sr-Co-Fe-based mixed oxide systems) are good oxygen-permeable ceramics. Figure 2.11 depicts a conceptual design of an oxygen membrane reactor equipped with an OPM. A detail of the ceramic membrane wall... 

---