Mitigation description

The consequential effects of transportation of materials to, and products and wastes from, the development are considered. For each significant potential impact identified, a description is required of the measures envisaged to mitigate the effects. 

What-if produces a table of narrative questions and answers suggesting accident scenano.s. consequences, and mitigation. Table 3.3.2-1 shows a typical What-If analysis for the Dock 8. < in the left in the line above the table is indicated the line/vessel that is being analyzed. To the right is the date and page numbers. The first row in the table contains the column headings beginning with i ie what-if question followed by the consequences, safety levels, scenario number and comments. 11C comments column may contain additional descriptive information or actions/ recommendations. 

This book is intended to mitigate these doubts. There is already enough of a structure to the theory of CA to show that they provide an effective and practical basis for the treatment of specific, as well as general, questions. In this monograph, the physical, formal and mathematical framework will be systematized to such an extent, that the framework becomes the natural setting for an effective description of the natural world. Just to what extent the fundamental laws of physics can, or... 

Short descriptions of some building related technologies are given. Application of these technologies will make a significant contribution to mitigation efforts. 

Spill Prevention Control under the Clean Water Act, the emergency response plan must be maintained at the facility and must include descriptions of all mitigating systems. 

In tenns of waste definition, there are three basic approaches (as it pertains to petrolenm, petroleum products, and nonpetroleum chemicals) to defining petro-lenm or a petroleum product as hazardous (1) a quahtative description of the waste by origin, type, and constitnents (2) classification by characteristics based on testing procednres and (3) classification as a result of the concentration of specific chemical snbstances (Chapter 1). In addition, there are recommended protocols that mnst occnr as a prelnde to cleanup of emissions and the mitigation of fntnre releases (Table 9.1). 

Statement of the intended use Including a general description of the diseases or conditions that the device will diagnose, treat, prevent, cure, or mitigate and a description of the patient -population, if appropriate. This section should include a comparison to predicate device and a rationale for any differences. 

This guideline has been organized to meet the needs of readers who are new to the concept of postrelease mitigation and who are interested in learning about techniques available for mitigating specific scenarios. To help each reader determine where to look in the guideline, a short description of each chapter s contents is provided below. 

Chapter 2—Overview of Release Scenarios and Postrelease Mitigation This chapter provides an overview of the different types of releases that can occur, the consequences of the discharges, and a general description of available postrelease mitigation measures. 

For each of the postrelease mitigation techniques examined a description of the consequences of the unmitigated release will be presented first, followed by the mitigated release. The results have been tabulated and shown in figures. 

This reads like a paraphrase of the dictionary definition quoted above. There is, however, an important difference. The description of lubrication as the mitigation of friction and wear—and it should be... 

In terms of evidence, the safety case should set out (for those key hazards where human factors are important mitigations) a clear chain of logic from the control to a workable and effective policy. At the most basic level this should consist of a formal reference to the document or traceability from a series of controls to several relevant policies. By supplementing this with a description of how the above policy characteristics were achieved, further confidence can be built to show that appropriate diligence and governance has been applied. 

Initial event description Initiating cause Cause likelihood Process design BPCS Alarm SIS Additional mitigation (safety valves, dikes, restricted access, etc.,) Mitigated likelihood Notes... 

Functional Description of each Safety Instrumented Function, Target SIL, Mitigated Hazards. Process paramefers. Logic, Bypass/Mainfenance requirements. Response time j... 

This chapter provides information to demonstrate compiiance with appiicabie requirements for the prevention of an inadvertent criticaiity in the Hot Ceil Faciiity (HCF). This inciudes a description of ali fissionabie materiai which may be contained in the HCF and a summary of the criticaiity prograrns and processes which are foiiowed to prevent and mitigate inadvertent criticaiity events. 

Event No. Event Description Causes Prevention Features Freq. Method of Detect Mitigative Features Unmitigated Consequences Risk Bin Safety Enhancement Consideration... 

---