Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microarrays probe effects

Fig. 6. Measurement of the relative amount of ligand bound to each protein in the array. (A) Schematic of on-chip binding assay in which a fluorescently labeled interaction partner binds to the functional, arrayed protein immobilized to the streptavidin-coated surface via the biotinylated BCCP tag. (B) p53 protein function microarray probed with Cy3-labeled GADD45 duplex oligo. Quantification of the signal intensity from each spot allows the effect of polymorphic and functional variation on the DNA binding function of p53 to be determined. Fig. 6. Measurement of the relative amount of ligand bound to each protein in the array. (A) Schematic of on-chip binding assay in which a fluorescently labeled interaction partner binds to the functional, arrayed protein immobilized to the streptavidin-coated surface via the biotinylated BCCP tag. (B) p53 protein function microarray probed with Cy3-labeled GADD45 duplex oligo. Quantification of the signal intensity from each spot allows the effect of polymorphic and functional variation on the DNA binding function of p53 to be determined.
In contrast to high density arrays low density arrays are made by deposition of pre-synthesized oligonucleotides or proteins on activated surfaces. There are several printing techniques for fabricating microarrays Non-contact biochip arrayers, commonly based on the piezoelectric effect, can apply controlled sub-nanoliter probe volumes to pre-specified locations on the chip surface. Due to the fact that the dispenser does not touch the surface, a non-contact arrayer provides low risk of contamination and is most suitable for printing on soft materials such as hydrogels. [Pg.483]

Fig. 7 Transcriptome effects of T3 administration on the developing zebrafish embryo, (a) Heatmap of microarray results from 652 probes showing significant differences between T3-treated and control samples. Fold induction values (in log scale) are represented by different shades of color (scale shown in the far-right bar.), (b) Distribution of overrepresented (red), underrepresented (blue), and unchanged/undetected (ivory) transcripts in T3-treated embryos belonging to the functional categories ossification, visual processes, and oxygen transport. The significance of the observed variations (p values) was calculated by the hypergeometric distribution with the Bonferroni correction... Fig. 7 Transcriptome effects of T3 administration on the developing zebrafish embryo, (a) Heatmap of microarray results from 652 probes showing significant differences between T3-treated and control samples. Fold induction values (in log scale) are represented by different shades of color (scale shown in the far-right bar.), (b) Distribution of overrepresented (red), underrepresented (blue), and unchanged/undetected (ivory) transcripts in T3-treated embryos belonging to the functional categories ossification, visual processes, and oxygen transport. The significance of the observed variations (p values) was calculated by the hypergeometric distribution with the Bonferroni correction...
The phosphate backbone of DNA molecules often results in undesirable electrostatic interactions with the substrate. Although the electrostatic interactions of DNA can be utilized for physical adsorption of DNA to the surface, this process can also lead to the nonspecific physical adsorption of target DNA on the surface. Rather than sample DNA hybridizing to the probe, it can adsorb to the surface and lead to interferences with the final detection call. Nonspecific adsorption effects have primarily been examined by the microarray community. Blocking strategies have been developed to prevent these nonspecific interactions. Succinic anhydride (SA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) are two common methods to prevent nonspecific adsorption on amine modified surfaces. Blocking strategies are desired to react with or pas-... [Pg.173]

In this study, the effects of ionic strength and carrier protein (BSA) were examined in terms of the outcome for microarray printing. As noted previously, many factors can unduly influence printing performance. Proteins are notoriously bad when it comes to nonspecific adsorption. It should not be much of a surprise that some portion of a protein probe will adsorb to the printing device, whether it is a stainless steel quill or glass capillary. [Pg.144]

While only -10% of microarray datasets address the problem of batch effects (48), the degree of error contributed by batch effects may be significant. Batch effects may include experimental variations introduced due to multiple types of technical bias (e.g., time, laboratory, reagents, handling). Analysis of multiple methods to address batch effects has been addressed for precision, accuracy, and overall performance (48). Once probe set raw intensities have been processed via normalization and possible additional corrective measures, values can be used for downstream analyses in identifying differentially expressed genes and corresponding functional associations. [Pg.456]

Our microarray data set contains substantial information about the mechanism and extent of CS effects on various genes. The small number of distinct temporal patterns indicates that a limited number of mechanisms may mediate CS pharma-cogenomics. Of special note, several genes such as ornithine decarboxylase and hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase were represented by multiple different probes on the gene arrays. Reasonable concordance in prohles and dynamic parameters from multiple probes indicated a good degree of reproducibility in results. [Pg.522]

Each microarray comprises multiple samples, printed in dilution curves (usually a series of serial 1 2 dilutions), on a single slide. This format allows the comparison of multiple samples across an array for a given antibody (see Fig. 1). Additionally, the dilution curve allows each antibody affinity to be matched with its optimal sample concentration and ensures that every analyte is analyzed and compared in its linear dynamic range. Nitrocellulose cannot be effectively stripped and reprobed therefore, each slide is probed with a... [Pg.118]


See other pages where Microarrays probe effects is mentioned: [Pg.370]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.2075]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.2581]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.1569]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.1087]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.22]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.369 ]




SEARCH



Microarray

Microarray probes

Microarray probing

Microarrays

© 2024 chempedia.info