Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Michaelis-Menten equation substrate present

This relation is the broadly known Michaelis-Menten equation. The effect of substrate concentration ni on the rate predicted by this equation follows a characteristic pattern. Where substrate concentration is considerably smaller than the half saturation constant (ni <reactive intermediate EA depends on the availability of the substrate A. In this case, (mA + K A ) and reaction rate r+ given by 17.18 is proportional to mA. For the opposite case, (mA K ), little free enzyme E is available to complex with A. Now, (mA + mA and reaction... [Pg.251]

In the ground-breaking scientific paper that presented their work, Menten and Michaelis also derived an important mathematical formula. This formula describes the rate at which enzymes break down their substrates. It correlates the speed of the enzyme reaction with the concentrations of the enzyme and the substrate. Called the Michaelis-Menten equation, it remains fundamental to our understanding of how enzymes catalyze reactions. [Pg.308]

Figure 1. Plot of v/V ax versus the millimolar concentration of total substrate for a model enzyme displaying Michaelis-Menten kinetics with respect to its substrate MA (i.e., metal ion M complexed to otherwise inactive ligand A). The concentrations of free A and MA were calculated assuming a stability constant of 10,000 M k The Michaelis constant for MA and the inhibition constant for free A acting as a competitive inhibitor were both assumed to be 0.5 mM. The ratio v/Vmax was calculated from the Michaelis-Menten equation, taking into account the action of a competitive inhibitor (when present). The upper curve represents the case where the substrate is both A and MA. The middle curve deals with the case where MA is the substrate and where A is not inhibitory. The bottom curve describes the case where MA is the substrate and where A is inhibitory. In this example, [Mfotai = [Afotai at each concentration of A plotted on the abscissa. Note that the bottom two curves are reminiscent of allosteric enzymes, but this false cooperativity arises from changes in the fraction of total "substrate A" that has metal ion bound. For a real example of how brain hexokinase cooperatively was debunked, consult D. L. Purich H. J. Fromm (1972) Biochem. J. 130, 63. Figure 1. Plot of v/V ax versus the millimolar concentration of total substrate for a model enzyme displaying Michaelis-Menten kinetics with respect to its substrate MA (i.e., metal ion M complexed to otherwise inactive ligand A). The concentrations of free A and MA were calculated assuming a stability constant of 10,000 M k The Michaelis constant for MA and the inhibition constant for free A acting as a competitive inhibitor were both assumed to be 0.5 mM. The ratio v/Vmax was calculated from the Michaelis-Menten equation, taking into account the action of a competitive inhibitor (when present). The upper curve represents the case where the substrate is both A and MA. The middle curve deals with the case where MA is the substrate and where A is not inhibitory. The bottom curve describes the case where MA is the substrate and where A is inhibitory. In this example, [Mfotai = [Afotai at each concentration of A plotted on the abscissa. Note that the bottom two curves are reminiscent of allosteric enzymes, but this false cooperativity arises from changes in the fraction of total "substrate A" that has metal ion bound. For a real example of how brain hexokinase cooperatively was debunked, consult D. L. Purich H. J. Fromm (1972) Biochem. J. 130, 63.
In words, under substrate-saturating conditions, the initial rate of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction (vQ) is independent of substrate concentration, [S] (Equation El 1.2). However, when the substrate is present in much less than saturating amounts ([S] KM), the Michaelis-Menten equation becomes... [Pg.372]

Equation (18) is the Henri-Michaelis-Menten equation, which relates the reaction velocity to the maximum velocity, the substrate concentration, and the dissociation constant for the enzyme-substrate complex. Usually substrate is present in much higher molar concentration than enzyme, and the initial period of the reaction is examined so that the free substrate concentration [S] is approximately equal to the total substrate added to the reaction mixture. [Pg.141]

The Michaelis-Menten equation represents a mechanistic model because it is based upon an assumed chemical reaction mechanism of how the system behaves. If the system does indeed behave in the assumed manner, then the mechanistic model is adequate for describing the system. If, however, the system does not behave in the assumed manner, then the mechanistic model is inadequate. The only way to determine the adequacy of a model is to carry out experiments to see if the system does behave as the model predicts it will. (The design of such experiments will be discussed in later chapters.) In the present example, if substrate inhibition occurs, the Michaelis-Menten model would probably be found to be inadequate a different mechanistic model would better describe the behavior of the system. [Pg.15]

Michaelis constant (Km) The Michaelis constant measures the binding affinity of an enzyme for a substrate. According to the Michaelis-Menten equation, if a substrate is present at a concentration equal to the Michaelis constant, the rate of substrate conversion will reach 1 /2Vmax. [Pg.401]

Michaelis-Menten kinetics — is the dependence of an initial -> reaction rate upon the concentration of a substrate S that is present in large excess over the concentration of an enzyme or another catalyst (or reagent) E with the appearance of saturation behavior following the Michaelis-Menten equation,... [Pg.425]

Vmax is the maximum rate of an enzyme reaction when the substrate is present in saturating amounts. Vmax is derived fiom the Michaelis-Menten equation, where v is the initial velocity and P is the product of the reaction. v-V [S]/(Km+[S]=d [P]/dl. [Pg.322]

Calculate Uob over a wide range of substrate concentrations, for example, [S] = 0.1 to [S] = 25. Plot 1/Vob. versus 1/[S], Uobs/[S] versus i/ob., and so on. All the plots are linear if only one enzyme is present. If more than one enzyme is present, the plots will deviate from linearity. Figures 4-16a and b show two of the plots. The Vobi/[S] versus u bi obviously provides the better indication that the data do not conform to a single Henri-Michaelis-Menten equation. (The plot is curved over a wider range of points.) The Vob. versus Wob /[S] and [SJ/Vob, versus [S] plots are also better than the 1/Vom versus l/[6] plot for detecting multiple enzymes that catalyze the same reaction. [Pg.241]

This is the Michaelis-Menten equation, but with K , modified by a term including the inhibitor concentration and inhibitor constant. is unaltered. Therefore, curves of v against [5] in the presence and absence of inhibitor reach the same limiting value at high substrate concentrations, but when the inhibitor is present, JC, is apparently greater. Plots of 1/v against 1/[S] with and without inhibitor cut the ordinate at the same point but have different slopes and intercepts on the abscissa (Figure 8-9). [Pg.205]

The Michaelis-Menten equation relates the initial velocity of the reaction (V ) to the concentration of enzyme substrate complexes (ES). This equation is derived for a reaction in which a single substrate, S, is converted to a single product, P. The enzyme (E) and S associate to form ES with the rate constant of k,. The complex dissociates with the rate constant of kj, or is converted to P with the rate constant kj. Under conditions in which [S] [E], [P] is negligible, and the rate of conversion of ES to an enzyme-product complex is very fast, v, = kj [ES]. The concentration of ES is a fraction of Ej, the total amount of enzyme present as ES and E. [Pg.140]

The graph of the Michaelis-Menten equation (Vj as a function of substrate concentration) is a rectangular hyperbola that approaches a finite limit, Y, as the fraction of total enzyme present as enzyme-substrate complex increases (Fig. 9.2). [Pg.140]

The rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of enzyme if you double the amount of enzyme, you will double the amount of product produced per minute, whether you are at low or at saturating concentrations of substrate. This important relationship between velocity and enzyme concentration is not immediately apparent in the Michaelis-Menten equation because the concentration of total enzyme present (E() has been incorporated into the term Vmax (that is, V ax IS CQual to the rate constant kj times Ej.) However, V ax is most often expressed as product produced per minute per milligram of enzyme and is meant to reflect a property of the enzyme that is not dependent on its concentration. [Pg.142]

Equations for the initial velocity of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction, such as the Michaelis-Menten equation, can provide useful parameters for describing or comparing enzymes. However, many multisubstrate enzymes, such as glucokinase, have kinetic patterns that do not fit the Michaelis-Menten model (or do so under non-physiologic conditions). The Michaelis-Menten model is also inapplicable to enzymes present in a higher concentration than their substrates. Nonetheless, the term K is still used for these enzymes to describe the approximate concentration of substrate at which velocity equals Y2 V ax-... [Pg.143]

The studies of the kinetics of bioelectrocatalytic transformations show that in some systems (for instance, adsorbed laccase ) the kinetic parameters correspond to the phenomenology of electrochemical kinetics, while in other systems (for instance, lactate oxidation they fit the phenomenology of enzymatic catalysis. In the latter case, we observe a hyperbolic dependence of anode current on the substrate concentration, as expected from the Michaelis-Menten equation. The absence of a general theory of bioelectrocatalysis does not permit us to examine the kinetics of electrochemical reactions in the presence of enzymes under different conditions. At present we can only try to estimate the scope of possible accelerations of electrochemical reactions by making some simple assumptions. [Pg.284]

This is of course the simple Michaelis-Menten equation, well-known in enzyme kinetics. This expression describes the flux for the reaction of the substrate at the catalyst particle where there is no concentration polarization of substrate in the film. The expression presented is valid for all values of the substrate concentration. [Pg.316]

Such an effect can be useful in the case of enzymatic substrate determinations (cf. 2.6.1.3). When inhibitor activity is absent, i. e. [I] = 0, Equation 2.72 is transformed into the Michaelis-Menten equation (Equation 2.41). The Line-weaver-Burk plot (Fig. 2.30a) shows that the intercept 1 /V with the ordinate is the same in the presence and in the absence of the inhibitor, i. e. the value of V is not affected although the slopes of the lines differ. This shows that the inhibitor can be fully dislodged by the substrate from the active site of the enzyme when the substrate is present in high concentration. In other words, inhibition can be overcome at high substrate concentrations (see application in Fig. 2.49). The inhibitor constant, Ki, can be calculated from the corresponding intercepts with the abscissa in Fig. 2.30a by calculating the value of from the abscissa intercept when [I] = 0. [Pg.127]

The Michaelis-Menten equation was a large step forward in our ability to imderstand how biological systems control chemical processes. This equation linked the rate of enzymatic substrate catalysis to a mass action process relying on the fractional association between the substrate and the enzyme population. That is, the maximum conversion rate of substrate to product (Vmax) could be directly related to the concentration of the enzyme ([E]) present and the catalytic rate at which individual enzymes converted substrate molecules to product (kcat Equation 2). [Pg.357]

Under physiological conditions, [S] is seldom saturating, and itself is not particularly informative. That is, the in vivo ratio of [S]/A , usually falls in the range of 0.01 to 1.0, so active sites often are not filled with substrate. Nevertheless, we can derive a meaningful index of the efficiency of Michaelis-Menten-type enzymes under these conditions by employing the following equations. As presented in Equation (14.23), if... [Pg.439]

D23.4 Refer to eqns 23.26 and 23.27, which are the analogues of the Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk equations (23.21 and 23,22), as well as to Figure 23.13, There are three major modes of inhibition that give rise to distinctly different kinetic behavior (Figure 23.13), In competitive inhibition the inhibitor binds only to the active site of the enzyme and thereby inhibits the attachment of the substrate. This condition corresponds to a > 1 and a = 1 (because ESI does not form). The slope of the Lineweaver-Burk plot increases by a factor of a relative to the slope for data on the uninhibited enzyme (a = a = I), The y-intercept does not change as a result of competitive inhibition, In uncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds to a site of the enzyme that is removed from the active site, but only if the substrate is already present. The inhibition occurs because ESI reduces the concentration of ES, the active type of the complex, In this case a = 1 (because El does not form) and or > 1. The y-intercepl of the Lineweaver-Burk plot increases by a factor of a relative to they-intercept for data on the uninhibited enzyme, but the slope does not change. In non-competitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds to a site other than the active site, and its presence reduces the ability of the substrate to bind to the active site. Inhibition occurs at both the E and ES sites. This condition corresponds to a > I and a > I. Both the slope and y-intercept... [Pg.439]

A similar analysis than the one previously presented for simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics can be made for more complex kinetics involving reversible Michaelis-Menten reactions or product and substrate inhibition kinetics. Equations for each particular case and the corresponding boundary conditions for the case of spherical biocatalysts are (Jeison et al. 2003) ... [Pg.190]

The kinetics of many enzymes such as kinases and polymerases involve two or more substrates and products. Such multisubstrate enzymes present far more complex kinetics than the Michaelis—Menten type because of the order of substrate and/or product interactions with the enzyme. For the formulation of detailed rate equations for multisubstrate enzyme systems, interested readers should consult the treatises on enzyme kinetics (110,118). [Pg.43]

The pioneering work of Anthony F. Bartholomay [8] introduced for Michaelis-Menten kinetics a time-evolution equation for the probabihty P( s, e. c. p. 0 where s, E, c. p. are the molecule numbers of substrate, enzyme, enzyme-substrate complex and product, respectively. For the case presented in Fig. 6.60, when the complex ES undergoes unimolecular decomposition to form a product P, regenerating the original enzyme E not directly but via o, the probabilities are given in the following way ... [Pg.326]

The basis of the operational model is the experimental finding that the experimentally obtained relationship between agonist-induced response and agonist concentration resembles a model of enzyme function presented in 1913 by Louis Michaelis and Maude L. Menten. This model accounts for the fact that the kinetics of enzyme reactions differ significantly from the kinetics of conventional chemical reactions. It describes the reaction of a substrate with an enzyme as an equation of the form reaction velocity = (maximal velocity of the reaction x substrate concentration)/(concentration of substrate A a... [Pg.68]

The most widely accepted theory of enzyme action is based on the formation of an intermediate compound or adsorption complex between enzyme and substrate (Brown, 1902 Henri, 1903). Since both conceptions of the nature of the enzyme-substrate complex can lead to the same kinetic equations, the distinction seems unimportant at present. In the following development of the kinetic equations, the original scheme of Michaelis and Menten (1913) will be followed and compound formation will be considered to take place. However, in later discussions, the process will be considered as a type of adsorption. [Pg.563]

Equation 2.39 contains a quantity, [Eq], which can be determined only when the enzyme is present in purified form. In order to be able to make kinetic measurements using impure enzymes, Michaelis and Menten introduced an approximation for Equation 2.39 as follows. In the presence of a large excess of substrate, [Ao] S> Km in the denominator of Equation 2.39. Therefore, Km can be neglected compared to [Ao] ... [Pg.119]


See other pages where Michaelis-Menten equation substrate present is mentioned: [Pg.272]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.169]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 ]




SEARCH



MENTEN

Michaelis equation

Michaelis-Menten

Michaelis-Menten equation

© 2024 chempedia.info