Naive model

On the other hand the estimation of the 3e>/3R quantities entails somewhat more effort. There are effectively two methods of approach of which the simpler uses the unsophisticated electrostatic model. On this basis Dq, and hence e, shows a 1/R5 distance dependence so that direct differentiation then indicates that at any given metal-ligand distance, R, de-JdR — -5 (ex/R). In justification of this rather naive model it may be noted that Bums and Axe13) found the strain dependence of Dq to be rather well described by the 1/R5 variation. 

While the scheme is attractive and in practice of some predictive value, the structural chemistry of the oxomolybdate-phosphonate/organoimine-copper system is significantly more complex than the naive model suggests. Consequently, a variety of molybdophosphate subunits are encountered, depending on crystallization conditions and the nature of the phosphate components, as well as diverse linkage modes of the Cu(II) sites to the molybdophosphate subunits. 

The number of electrons available for empirical evaluation of metal-metal bonding has been taken as the Pauling metallic valence less the number of H ions per metal. In this connection the valence numbers of Borelius (6) give somewhat better correlations—e.g., in differentiating Pd from Ag (valences 7 and 1, respectively). Heats of formation calculated from the lattice energies by the Born-Haber cycle are not yet sufficiently accurate to be useful numerically, but they provide an interesting rationalization of the formation of many hydrides. This is the principal reason for considering such a naive model. 

We shall start with a couple of such naive models for the liquid state, and for reactions occurring in solution. A molecular liquid in macroscopic equilibrium may be viewed as a large assembly of molecules incessantly colliding, and exchanging energy among collision partners and among in-... 

The potential energy surface used in solution, G (R), is related to an effective Hamiltonian containing a solute-solvent interaction term, Vint- In the implementation of the EH-CSD model, that will be examined in Section 6, use is made of the equilibrium solute-solvent potential. There are good reasons to do so however, when the attention is shifted to a dynamical problem, we have to be careful in the definition of Vint - This operator may be formally related to a response function TZ which depends on time. For simplicity s sake, we may replace here TZ with the polarization vector P, which actually is the most important component of TZ (another important contribution is related to Gdis) For the calculation of Gei (see eq.7), we resort to a static value, while for dynamic calculations we have to use a P(t) function quantum electrodynamics offers the theoretical framework for the calculation of P as well as of TZ. The strict quantum electrodynamical approach is not practical, hence one usually resorts to simple naive models. 

In Chapter 4 we considered a naive model of IC chromatography based on a molecular-kinetic description of the competing process of adsorption and desorption. The rate of adsorption was the number of molecules hitting the unit surface per unit time, and that of desorption was governed by the Boltzmann factor with the desorption energy in the exponent. It resulted in Eq. 4.1, which can be rewritten like ... 

The most naive model we can imagine is to insist that whatever model we select for the density of states faithfully reproduces the first moment of the exact vibrational density of states. That is. 

The formalism necessary to calculate ESR spectra that arise from collisional exchange interaction is outlined briefly, and detailed equations used in our calculation are given. A simple but naive model for the collision frequency and its connection to the spin label, exchange collision frequency is developed. The model is instructive and indicates the limit of sensitivity of the spin label method in measuring surface viscosities. 

There is no immediate need to abandon the conventional use of structural formulae as graphical models of molecular shape, provided it carries no connotation of electron pairs or hybrid orbitals. The extensive use of LCAO methods to simulate electron densities in molecules may be even harder to give up, but is also more misleading than the naive model of localized Lewis pairs. 

Data mining methods are widely available and can often be highly sophisticated algorithms that use advanced techniques from computer science and artificial intelligence. However, simple and intuitive methods can often work well, without much loss in predictive ability. With small datasets, where the focus is developing interpretable models, these simple methods may be the best first approach, perhaps as part of a conscious elfort to explore the data. In any case it is useful to have some benchmark result against which the performance of more complex, computationally expensive and difficult to interpret methods can be compared. The simplest naive model is prediction by the mean of the dataset, which is in elfect prediction without using a model, and this can serve as a useful reality check and comparator. 

In instance based learning the training data is used directly and predictions are done by taking some consensus value of the nearest training set points. Sometimes called model independent methods, or naive models, they are conceptually simple and explicit examples of the well known similarity principle, which is the hypothesis that chemically similar compounds have similar properties. The diversity of methods available derives from the different choices to be made regarding how chemical space is defined and which distance metric is used. 

MASE is less than one if it arises from a better forecast than the average one-step Naive forecast computed in-sample. The Naive model uses the last observation of the time series directly as the forecast. Conversely, it is greater than one if the forecast is worse than the average one-step Naive forecast computed in-sample. 

It is also good practice to compare the statistical forecast to a naive forecast. (The naive forecast is a simple technique where the forecast equals the volume of goods sold in the prior forecasting period.) Naive forecasts, in some situations, can be surprisingly difficult to beat, yet it is very important that the organizations ensure that software and a statistical modeler improve on the naive model. The focus needs to be on continuous improvement. If the software, modeler is not able to do this, it makes sense to implement better software, improve the skills of the modeler, or just use the naive model as a baseline forecast. 

A factorization of a liquid into molecular subunits was implicit in flic naive model we have used in the introduction. The interactions within a molecule surely are larger than those among molecules however, we cannot neglect these couplings, which are essential to describe a liquid. This is the main subject of this chapter and will be treated with due attention in the following sections. 

We have so far examined deeompositions of two-body interaetion potentials, keeping fixed the internal geometry of both partners. This eonsfraint is elearly unphysieal, and does not eorrespond to the naive model we have eonsidered in the infroduetion, because molecules always exhibit internal motions, even when isolated, and beeause molecular collisions in a liquid (as well as in a cluster) lead to exehanges of energy between internal as well as external degrees of freedom. 

The naive model is not adequate. However, a bit more can be extracted from it. Table 2.6 quotes measurements of rj and x. Included are three estimates of d, two calculated from transport data using the expression for fj and X of Table 2.2. The third is determined from critical point data via the van der Waals boi since Vc = 3boand = iAo(4jrrf /3) then d = vJlnNo). In addition the mean free path is evaluated using (2.12) with the value of d determined from viscosity data. The estimates of d from transport and critical point data differ considerably. Nonetheless they are of the same order of magnitude, which suggests that the model is not unreasonable. 

In this chapter we focus upon the dynamics of the reactive collision process in the gas phase. To this end we first show how the basic measurable parameter in collision chemistry, the reaction cross section, may be related to its thermal counterpart, the rate constant. We then discuss the experimental approach to measurement of reaction cross section as well as a naive model. The remainder of the chapter is devoted to the interpretation of a number of experiments in terms of simple dynamical models for reactive collisions. We make no attempt to develop a theory of reaction cross sections. 

Clearly there is still a connection with the elementary homely model but it is also fair to say that the move towards greater abstraction has somewhat invalidated the naive model. This now raises the question as to whether the elementary model really does have explanatory power. I would argue that it does not. It may have led historically to these more sophisticated approaches but it has been rendered vastly more abstract in the process. 

A simplified and naive model of activation overpotential versus current density expression from a Butler-Volmer equation can be written as ... 

Starch gelatinization in doughs was investigated with DSC and referred to as a reliable measure of the baking progress, in spite of the naive model used to describe the overall process [80,81],... 

---