Metal ruthenium-based catalysts

In contrast to the situation with copper-based catalysis, most studies on ruthenium-based catalysts have made use of preformed metal complexes. The first reports of ruthenium-mediated polymerization by Sawamoto and coworkers appeared in I995.26 In the early work, the square pyramidal ruthenium (II) halide 146 was used in combination with a cocatalyst (usually aluminum isopropoxide). 

Transition-metal-based Lewis acids such as molybdenum and tungsten nitro-syl complexes have been found to be active catalysts [49]. The ruthenium-based catalyst 50 (Figure 3.6) is very effective for cycloadditions with aldehyde- and ketone-bearing dienophiles but is ineffective for a,)S-unsaturated esters [50]. It can be handled without special precautions since it is stable in air, does not require dry solvents and does not cause polymerization of the substrates. Nitromethane was the most convenient organic solvent the reaction can also be carried out in water. 

Olefin metathesis is a unique reaction and is only possible by transition metal catalysis. In fact only complexes of Mo, W, Re, and Ru are known to catalyze olefin metathesis. Once it was known that metallocarbenes were the actual catalytic species, a variety of metal carbene complexes were prepared and evaluated as catalysts. Two types of catalysts have emerged as the most useful overall. The molybdenum-based catalysts developed by Schrock and ruthenium-based catalysts developed by Grubbs. 

Figure 18.13 Asymmetric ruthenium-based catalysts for enzyme-metal combi reaction (Kim, 2002).

The Kharasch addition reactions promoted by [RuCl2(PPh3)3] are believed to proceed through a redox chain mechanism (Eqs. 1-3) [ 16]. Their kinetics show a first-order dependence both on the ruthenium complex and on CC14. Whereas no clear-cut evidence for alkene coordination to the metal was found with catalyst precursor 1 (which readily loses one phosphine ligand), olefin coordination cannot be excluded because there is a saturation kinetic rate dependence on the alkene. This observation led to the proposal of a reversible step involving olefin coordination to the metal center [ 16,19,20]. Recent work with other ruthenium-based catalysts further supports olefin coordination (see later). 

Abstract Metathesis-based polymerizations of 1-alkynes and cyclopolymerizations of 1,6-heptadiynes using late transition metal catalysts are reviewed. Results obtained with both binary, ternary, and quaternary catalytic systems and well-defined molybdenum- and ruthenium-based catalysts are presented. Special consideration is given to advancements in catalyst design and mechanistic understanding that have been made in this area over the last few years advancements that have facilitated tailor-made syntheses of poly(ene)s. In addition, the first supported ruthenium-based cyclopolymerization-active systems are summarized. Finally, selected structure-dependent properties will be outlined where applicable. 

Rhodium-based catalysis suffers from the high cost of the metal and quite often from a lack of stereoselectivity. This justifies the search for alternative catalysts. In this context, ruthenium-based catalysts look rather attractive nowadays, although still poorly documented. Recently, diruthenium(II,II) tetracarboxylates [42], polymeric and dimeric diruthenium(I,I) dicarboxylates [43], ruthenacarbor-ane clusters [44], and hydride and silyl ruthenium complexes [45 a] and Ru porphyrins [45 b] have been introduced as efficient cyclopropanation catalysts, superior to the Ru(II,III) complex Ru2(OAc)4Cl investigated earlier [7]. In terms of efficiency, electrophilicity, regio- and (partly) stereoselectivity, the most efficient ruthenium-based catalysts compare rather well with the rhodium(II) carboxylates. The ruthenium systems tested so far seem to display a slightly lower level of activity but are somewhat more discriminating in competitive reactions, which apparently could be due to the formation of less electrophilic carbenoid species. This point is probably related to the observation that some ruthenium complexes competitively catalyze both olefin cyclopropanation and olefin metathesis [46], which is at variance with what is observed with the rhodium catalysts. 

DKR involves the combination of an enantioselective enzyme (often a hydro lytic enzyme such as a lipase) with a racemization catalyst (often a transition metal catalyst such as Shvo s ruthenium based catalyst and derivatives thereof) that is compatible with the enzyme. Under these conditions, both enantiomers of the starting material are converted to the product in yields and ee s that can approach 100%. 

The early development of catalysts for ammonia synthesis was based on iron catalysts prepared by fusion of magnetite with small amounts of promoters. However, Ozaki et al. [52] showed several years ago that carbon-supported alkali metal-promoted ruthenium catalysts exhibited a 10-fold increase in catalytic activity over conventional iron catalysts under the same conditions. In this way, great effort has been devoted during recent years to the development of a commercially suitable ruthenium-based catalyst, for which carbon support seems to be most promising. The characteristics of the carbon surface, the type of carbon material, and the presence of promoters are the variables that have been studied most extensively. 

The olefin metathesis is a useful tool to form new C-C carbon bonds by recombination of unsaturated hydrocarbons (Figure 24). While the early transition metal catalysts were air and moisture sensitive with low-functional-group tolerance, ruthenium-based catalysts are less sensitive and their heteroatom tolerance is increased (Figure 25). 

Titanium- and tungsten-based catalysts tend to react with olefinated ketones and esters, whereas molybdenum-based counterparts are more reactive toward olefins (though they can also react with aldehydes and other polar or protic groups). Ruthenium-based catalysts react preferentially with C=C double bonds over most other moieties, a feature that makes them unusually stable toward alcohols, amides, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. Because of this trend, the functional-group tolerance of an olefin metathesis catalyst can be increased by focusing on a later class of transition metal such as ruthenium [8]. 

After having observed that the most active ruthenium-based catalyst systems for olefin metathesis also displayed a high efficiency in atom transfer radical polymerisation, we then became interested in comparing the role of the catalyst in those two different reaction pathways. Ruthenium alkylidene complexes 4-6 are unsaturated 16-electron species which formally allow carbon-halogen bond activation to form a 17-electron ruthenium(III) intermediate. Our preliminary results indicate that polymerisations occur through a pathway in which both tricyclohexylphosphine and/or imidazolin-2-ylidene ligands remain bound to the metal centre. 

Apart from copper-based complexes several other metals have been used as well. Fe (56-59), Ni (60), Ru (15), etc have been used to some extent. Especially noteworthy here is the work by Sawamoto and co-workers. As indicated in the Introduction, Sawamoto and Matyjaszewski simultaneously pioneered ATRR Matyjaszewski started off with the use of copper, whereas Sawamoto spent most of his efforts on ruthenium-based catalysts. Recent work from Sawamoto and co-workers shows that the Ru-based complexes can compete with the Cu-based systems on many fronts. Although not yet perfect it seems that a specific Fe-based catalyst is the first to pol5unerize vinyl acetate via an ATRP mechanism (61). 

---