Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mercury, polarization

Many examples exist of interfaces formed between two immiscible liquids. A well-known one is the interface between a long-chain hydrocarbon, for example, dodecane, and water, which is commonly known as the oil water interface. Dodecane and water are immiscible because the hydrocarbon phase is nonpolar. Liquid liquid interfaces are also formed between water and organic liquids with polar groups such as octanol and heptanoic acid, which also have rather long hydrocarbon chains. The polar liquid nitrobenzene, which has a relative permittivity of 35, is also immiscible with water. Another well-known system is the mercury polar liquid interface. This has been studied extensively, especially for aqueous electrolyte solutions. However, the mercury polar liquid interface is also an example of a metal solution interface which was considered in the previous section. The discussion here is limited to liquids with relative dielectric permittivities falling in the range 1-200, and systems which have poor conductivities as pure liquids. [Pg.426]

Starukhina, L.V. High radar response of Mercury polar regions water ice or cold silicates In Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts. Lunar and Planetary Inst., Technical Report, vol. 31, p. 1301 (2000)... [Pg.227]

Using Langmuir s principle of independent surface action, make qualitative calculations and decide whether the polar or the nonpolar end of ethanol should be oriented toward the mercury phase at the ethanol-mercury interface. [Pg.93]

It is necessary that the mercury or other metallic surface be polarized, that is, that there be essentially no current flow across the interface. In this way no chemical changes occur, and the electrocapillary effect is entirely associated with potential changes at the interface and corresponding changes in the adsorbed layer and diffuse layer. [Pg.193]

In contrast to spectrophotometry, hght-scattering experiments are generally conducted at constant wavelength. Mercury vapor lamps are the most widely used light sources, since the strong lines at 436 and 546 nm are readily isolated by filters to allow monochromatic illumination. Polarizing filters are also included for both the incident and scattered beams so that depolarization can... [Pg.690]

Stripping voltammetry procedure has been developed for determination of thallium(I) traces in aqueous medium on a mercury film electrode with application of thallium preconcentration by coprecipitation with manganese (IV) hydroxide. More than 90% of thallium present in water sample is uptaken by a deposit depending on conditions of prepai ation of precipitant. Direct determination of thallium was carried out by stripping voltammetry in AC mode with anodic polarization of potential in 0,06 M ascorbic acid in presence of 5T0 M of mercury(II) on PU-1 polarograph. [Pg.209]

Consider two examples. In the first example, hydrogen is evolved cathodicaUy by ion discharge at metals where this reaction occnrs with high polarization (e.g., at mercury, z, = 1, = 0.5). hi this case the reaction occurs at potentials mnch more... [Pg.247]

Adsorption of surface-active substances is attended by changes in EDL structure and in the value of the / -potential. Hence, the effects described in Section 14.2 will arise in addition. When surface-active cations [NR] are added to an acidic solution, the / -potential of the mercury electrode will move in the positive direction and cathodic hydrogen evolution at the mercury, according to Eq. (14.16), will slow down (Fig. 14.6, curve 2). When I ions are added, the reaction rate, to the contrary, will increase (curve 3), owing to the negative shift of / -potential. These effects disappear at potentiafs where the ions above become desorbed (at vafues of pofarization of less than 0.6 V in the case of [NR]4 and at values of polarization of over 0.9 V in the case of I ). [Pg.249]

FIGURE 14.6 Influence of surface-active ions [N(C4H9)4]+ (curve 2) and I (curve 3) on the polarization curve for hydrogen evolution at a mercury electrode in acidic solutions (curve 1 is for the base electrolyte). [Pg.250]

Experience shows that in the deposition of a number of metals (mercury, silver, lead, cadmium, and others), the rate of the initial reaction is high, and the associated polarization is low (not over 20 mV). For other metals (particularly of the iron group), high values of polarization are found. The strong inhibition of cathodic metal deposition that is found in the presence of a number of organic substances (and which was described in Section 14.3) is also observed at mercury electrodes (i.e., it can be also associated with the initial step of the process). [Pg.258]

FIGURE 15.3 pH dependence of potential (1) and polarization (2) in cathodic hydrogen evolution at a mercury electrode (lOmA/cm ), and the pH dependence of equilibrium potential of the hydrogen electrode (3). [Pg.270]

At mercury and graphite electrodes the kinetics of reactions (15.21) and (15.22) can be studied separately (in different regions of potential). It follows from the experimental data (Fig. 15.6) that in acidic solutions the slope b 0.12 V. The reaction rate is proportional to the oxygen partial pressure (its solution concentration). At a given current density the electrode potential is independent of solution pH because of the shift of equilibrium potential, the electrode s polarization decreases by 0.06 V when the pH is raised by a unit. These data indicate that the rate-determining step is addition of the first electron to the oxygen molecule ... [Pg.276]

At the platinum electrode the individual steps of the four-electron reaction cannot be studied separately. Slope b has its usual value of about 0.12 V, but in contrast to what is seen at the mercury electrode, the polarization is practically independent of solution pH (i.e., the potential at a given current density shifts by 0.06 V in the negative direction when the pH is raised by a unit). It follows that the reaction rate depends on hydrogen ion concentration. The step in which an electron and a proton are transferred while the 0-0 bond is broken is probably the ratedetermining step. [Pg.277]

For the cathodic reduction of organic substances, electrodes of two types are used the platinum and the mercury type. Those of the first type (platinum metals, and in alkaline solutions nickel) exfiibit low polarization in hydrogen evolution their potential can be pushed in the negative direction no further than to -0.3 V (RHE). Hydrogen readily adsorbs on these electrodes, which is favorable for reduction... [Pg.281]

In the classical version one uses a two-electrode cell with DME and a mercury AE (the pool) at the bottom of the cell (see Fig. 23.2). The latter, which has a large surface area, is practically not polarized. The current at the DME is low and causes no marked ohmic potential drop in the solution and no marked polarization of the AE. Hence, to change the DME potential, it will suffice to vary the external voltage applied to the cell. During the measurements, 7 vs. % rather than 7 vs. E curves are recorded. [Pg.391]

Constant A in Eqs. (29.5) and (29.6) is about 4.4 eV when the standard hydrogen electrode is used as the reference electrode. This value has been determined from experimental values for the electron work function of mercury in vacuum, which is 4.48 eV, and for the Volta potential, between the solution and a mercury electrode polarized to = 0 V (SHE), which is -0.07 V (the work of electron transfer is 0.07 eV). The sum of these two values, according to Eq. (9.8), corresponds to the solution s electron work function at this potential (i.e., to the value of constant A with an inverted sign). [Pg.561]

The solvation property of the cations of this very polar aprotic solvent can make some salts more stable. Therefore, aluminium, sodium, mercury or silver perchlorate solutions are explosive. The same goes for iron (III) nitrate solutions. [Pg.348]

Lindberg SE, Brooks SB, Lin C-J, Scott KJ, Landis MS, Stevens RK, Goodsite M, Richter A. 2002. The dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic atmosphere at polar sunrise. Environ Sci Technol 36 1245-1256. [Pg.44]

Hindell MA, Brothers N, Gales R. 1999. Mercury and cadmium concentrations in the tissues of three species of southern albatrosses. Polar Biol 22 102-108. [Pg.177]


See other pages where Mercury, polarization is mentioned: [Pg.200]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.1178]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.129]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.387 , Pg.388 ]




SEARCH



Mercury polar organic liquids

Polarity mercury

Polarity mercury

© 2024 chempedia.info